High-ranking officials of Russia’s social ministries: Recruitment channels and careers

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article considers recruitment channels and careers of high-ranking officials of social ministries of the Russian government. The study is based on the biographical database of 104 deputy ministers and department directors from six ministries and shows that bureaucratic professionalization is the key feature of the officials’ career, and federal administration is the main channel for their recruitment, since the majority have already worked in their ministry for some time before taking their current position. These trends may indicate the importance of meritocratic selection based on competence. However, officials with a career primarily in the federal administration, especially in one ministry, are a minority. There is interdepartmental mobility in social ministries, with a number of officials coming from financial ministries, which can increase their influence on the social bloc, contributing to the formation of its policies in a neoliberal spirit. After the administrative sphere, the most significant supplier of officials are social organizations subordinate to ministries (institutions of science, education, health care, social security, culture and sports). Business plays a relatively modest role as a channel for recruiting officials for social ministries, especially compared to economic ministries. In general, work experience in business, regional administrations and social organizations is more widespread, while intradepartmental recruitment is less common among deputy ministers. Moreover, there are ministries with pronounced intradepartmental recruitment and ministries with relatively developed recruitment from business; in some ministries there are intersections between ministers and their subordinates in previous careers, which may indicate a patrimonial nature of selection.

About the authors

D. B. Tev

Sociological Institute of RAS - Branch of FCTAS of RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: denis_tev@mail.ru
7th Krasnoarmejskaya St., 25/14, Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russia

References

  1. Borshchevsky G. Vysshie gosudarstvennye sluzhashchie kak politiko-administrativnaja elita sovremennoj Rossii [Senior civil servants as the Russian political-administrative elite]. Politija. 2018; 1. (In Russ.).
  2. Gimpelson V.E., Magun V.S. Na sluzhbe gosudarstva rossijskogo: perspektivy i ogranichenija kariery molodyh chinovnikov [In the service of the Russian state: Prospects and limitations of the young officials’ career]. Vestnik Obshchestvennogo Mnenija. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii. 2004; 5. (In Russ.).
  3. Kryshtanovskaya О. Osnovnye trendy formirovanija upravlencheskoj elity Rossii 2020-2030 gg. [Key trends in the development of the Russian governing elite in 2020-2030]. Vestnik RFFI. Gumanitarnye i Obshchestvennye Nauki. 2020; 5. (In Russ.).
  4. Tev D.B. Federalnaja administrativnaja elita Rossii: kariernye puti i kanaly rekrutirovanija [Russia’s federal administrative elite: Career paths and channels of recruitment]. Political Studies. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  5. Tev D.B. Vysokopostavlennye chinovniki federalnyh ekonomicheskih ministerstv Rossii: osnovnye kanaly rekrutirovanija i kariera [High-ranking officials of Russia’s federal economic ministries: Main recruitment channels and careers]. Vlast’i Elity. 2022; 9 (1). (In Russ.).
  6. Huntington S. Politichesky porjadok v menjajushhcihsja obshhestvah [Political Order in Changing Societies]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
  7. Aberbach J.D., Putnam R.D., Rockman B.A. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge- London; 1981.
  8. Brown Jr. J.R. The Ministry of Finance: Bureaucratic Practices and the Transformation of the Japanese Economy. Westport-London; 1999.
  9. Cassese S. Italy’s senior civil service: An ossified world. Page E.C., Wright V. (Eds.). Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States. A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials. Oxford; 1999.
  10. Derlien Y-U. Repercussions of government change on the career in civil service in West Germany: The cases of 1969 and 1982. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 1988; 1 (1).
  11. Derlien H-U. Mandarins or managers? The bureaucratic elite in Bonn, 1970 to 1987 and beyond. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration. 2003; 6 (3).
  12. Edinger L., Searing D. Social background in elite analysis: A methodological inquiry. American Political Science Review. 1967; 61 (2).
  13. Etzion D., Davis G.F. Revolving doors? A network analysis of corporate officers and U.S. Government officials. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2008; 17 (3).
  14. Fortescue S. Russia’s civil service: Professional or patrimonial? Executive-level officials in five federal ministries. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2020; 36 (4).
  15. Goetz K.H. The development and current features of the German civil service system. Van der Meer F.M. (Ed.). Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham; 2011.
  16. Greer S.L., Jarman H. The British civil service system. Van der Meer F.M. (Ed.). Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham; 2011.
  17. Harris J.S., Garcia T.V. The permanent secretaries: Britain’s top administrators. Public Administration Review. 1966; 26 (1).
  18. Huskey E. The politics-administration nexus in post-communist Russia. Rowney D.K., Huskey E. (Eds.). Russian Bureaucracy and the State: Officialdom from Alexander III to Vladimir Putin. Basingstoke-New York; 2009.
  19. Huskey E. Elite recruitment and state-society relations in technocratic authoritarian regimes: The Russian case. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2010; 43 (4).
  20. Koh B.C. Stability and change in Japan’s higher civil service. Comparative Politics. 1979; 11 (3).
  21. Lewanski R., Toth F. The Italian civil service system. Van der Meer F.M. (Ed.). Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham; 2011.
  22. Mann D.E. The selection of federal political executives. American Political Science Review. 1964; 58 (1).
  23. Mann D.E., Smith Z.A. The selection of U.S. Cabinet officers and other political executives. International Political Science Review. 1981; 2 (2).
  24. Martin J.M. An examination of executive branch appointments in the Reagan administration by background and gender. Western Political Quarterly. 1991; 44 (1).
  25. Ogushi A. Russian bureaucratic elites: Patrimonial or technocratic? ICCEES VIII World Congress. Stockholm; 2010.
  26. Schmidt C. Japan’s circle of power: Legitimacy and integration of a national elite. ASIEN - German Journal on Contemporary Asia. 2005; 96.
  27. Talbot C. The British administrative elite. The art of change without changing? Revue française d’administration publique. 2014; 3-4.
  28. Theakston K., Fry G.K. Britain’s administrative elite: Permanent secretaries 1900-1986. Public Administration. 1989; 67 (2).
  29. Van Thiel S., Steijn B., Allix M. ‘New public managers’ in Europe: Changes and trends. Pollitt C., Van Thiel S., Homburg. V. (Eds.). New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives. Basingstoke; 2007.

Copyright (c) 2024 Tev D.B.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies