Softness of consonants in the oral speech of Russian-speaking bilinguals in Germany and monolinguals in Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The softness of Russian consonants in the oral speech of two generations of Russian-speaking bilinguals in Germany and monolinguals in Russia is explored. The relevance of the problem is due to the importance of studying the inherited Russian language of bilinguals, comparing the phonetic features of the speech of different generations of bilinguals, as well as their comparison with the features of the speech of Russian native speakers living in Russia, the need to study the state of the Russian language in the diaspora. The research is aimed at identifying the i-glide between the consonant and the subsequent vowel, which indicates the softness of the consonant. The material of the research was 300 syllables with soft consonants in voice recordings of phonetically representative texts developed in 1988 by S.B. Stepanova and used for many years as a universal tool for studying the phonetic aspect of oral speech. Auditory phonetic analysis of combinations of a soft consonant and a subsequent vowel, instrumental analysis with the Praat computer program (version 6.0.26), comparative analysis of the data were applied. The analysis of 300 syllables with soft consonants in various positions in the word showed that in the speech of bilinguals there are cases of i-glide absence: 83 cases (27%) in the speech of children and 32 cases (10%) in the speech of parents. It was proved that such cases most often occur with sonants, soft affricates, as well as some labial and dental consonants in the middle of a word. In the speech of monolinguals, there are almost no such cases. Russian speech in Germany is influenced by the phonetic system of the German language, however, most bilinguals (both children and adults) retain i-glide between a soft consonant and a vowel, which is characteristic of the Russian language. Comparison of the results of studying consonant softness with the results of studying their voicedness shows that softness is a more stable phonetic feature of Russian consonants compared to voicedness. The data obtained may be useful not only to linguists, but also to the authors of Russian language textbooks for bilingual children, as well as Russian language teachers working in German schools.

About the authors

Anastasia Yu. Vikhrova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: avikhrova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3836-8976

Candidate of Philology, leading researcher, Laboratory of Experimental Phonetics, Institute of Asian and African Countries

11 Mokhovaya St, bldg 1, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

Tatiana V. Lypkan

Saint Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lypkan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5073-3358

7-9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

References

  1. Abramova, T.A., Dyachenko, O.V., & Ivanova, M.A. (2006). The phonetic aspect of communication in a non-native language (N.A. Lyubimova, Ed.) St. Petersburg: Filologicheskii Fakul'tet SPbGU Publ. (In Russ.)
  2. Akhmedova, A.A. (2009). Scientific basis for the analysis of interlingual sound interference in the Russian speech of Dargin students. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, (1), 74–78. (In Russ.)
  3. Barry, S. (1995). Variation in vocal fold vibration during voiced obstruents in Russian. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829509082523
  4. Beckman, J., Jessen, M., & Ringen, C. (2013). Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics, 49, 259–284. https://doi.org/:io.ioi7/Soo222267i2000424
  5. Bondarko, L.V., & Verbitskaya, L.A. (1965). On the markedness of the sign of softness in Russian consonants. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, 18(2), 119–126.
  6. Bondarko, L.V., Verbitskaya, L.A., & Gordina, M.V. (2000). Fundamentals of General Phonetics. St. Petersburg: Filologicheskii Fakultet SPbGU Publ. (In Russ.)
  7. Braun, А. (1996). Zur regionalen Distribution von VOT im Deutschen. In A. Braun (Ed.), Papers on Speech and Voice (pp. 19–32). Stuttgart: Steiner.
  8. Braunschweiler, N. (1997). Integrated cues of voicing and vowel length in German: A production study. Language and Speech, 40, 353–376.
  9. Brehmer, B., & Kurbangulova, T. (2017). Chapter 8. Lost in transmission? Family language input and its role for the development of Russian as a heritage language in Germany. Input and Heritage Language Development (pp. 225–268). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  10. Dittmers, T.I. (2017). Realization of voiceless and voiced stop consonants in the German-Russian language contact: The time of the beginning of voicing. In T.A. Kruglyakova, M.A. Elivanova & T.A. Ushakova (Eds.), Problems of Ontolinguistics ‒ 2017. Mastering and Functioning of the Language in a Situation of Multilingualism: Proceedings of the Annual International Scientific Conference, June 26‒28, 2017 (pp. 62–67). Ivanovo: Listos Publ. (In Russ.)
  11. Gushchina, I. (2013). Sprachliche Interferenzen bei Russisch Deutsch-Mehrsprachigen: Inaugural-dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie dem Fachbereich Germanistik und Kunstwissenschaften Fachgebiet Deutsch als Fremdsprache der Philipps-Universität Marburg. Marburg.
  12. Koonhyuk B., Wonhoi K., & Hyug A. (2014). Reanalysis of the Russian ikan’e. Russian Linguistics, 38, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-014-9129-y
  13. Koonhyuk, B., Sung-Hoon, H., & Hyug, A. (2018). A quantitative analysis of the phonemic status of the Russian vowel /y/. Russian Linguistics, 42, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-018-9203-y
  14. Lypkan, T.V. (2022). Dynamics of phonetic intergenerational changes in deafness and voicedness of stop plosive consonants in the Russian speech of German bilinguals. Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education, (S6), 10–16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6s-22.010
  15. Lypkan, T.V., & Khromov, S.S. (2020). Deafness-voicing of occlusive plosive consonants in Russian speech of bilingual adults in Germany. Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education, (1), 25–30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.1-20.025
  16. Lyubimova, N.A. (1985). Phonetic interference. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU Publ. (In Russ.)
  17. Lyubimova, N.A. (2011). Linguistic foundations for teaching the articulation of Russian sounds. Setting and correction. Moscow: Russky Yazyk. Kursy Publ. (In Russ.)
  18. Mende, Ph. (2019). On the problem of palatalization and depalatalization from the point of view of feature geometry using the example of Russian. Journal of Slavic Studies, 64(3), 465–492.
  19. Protsukovich, E.A. (2014). Qualitative characteristics of consonant phonemes |t| and |t'| in the Russian speech of the Selimdzhin Evenks. Slovo: Fol'klorno-Dialektologicheskii Al'manakh, (11), 101–105. (In Russ.)
  20. Protsukovich, E.A. (2015). Features of the implementation of consonants in the non-native speech of bilinguals (on the material of the Russian speech of the Selemdzha Evenks). Herald of Vyatka State University, (10), 80–85. (In Russ.)
  21. Punegova, G.V. (2013). Sound interference in speech communication in the conditions of Russian-Komi bilingualism (on the material of middle-lingual consonants). Vestnik Syktyvkarskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnykh Nauk, (2), 128–136. (In Russ.)
  22. Sagitova, L.E., & Burzhunov, G.G. (2008). Perception and reproduction of hard and soft consonants of the Russian language by Dagestan-Russian bilinguals. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, (2), 111–118. (In Russ.)
  23. Sazhina, S.A. (2016). Consonantism of the language of the Kirov Permyaks. Siberian Journal of Philology, (1), 240–246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/54/29
  24. Stepanova, S.V. (1988). Phonetic properties of Russian speech: implementation and transcription. [Author’s abstr. cand. philol. diss.]. Leningrad. (In Russ.)
  25. Stern, A.S. (1981). Influence of linguistic factors on speech perception. (Candidate dissertation, Leningrad). (In Russ.)
  26. Tananaiko, S.O. (1993). Acoustic characteristics of vowels after soft consonants in the conditions of interference of related languages (based on the Russian speech of Poles). [Author’s abstr. cand. philol. diss.]. Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.)
  27. Zemskaya, E.A. (2001). The language of the Russian abroad: Results and prospects of the study. Russian Language and Linguistic Theory, (1), 114–131. (In Russ.)
  28. Zinder, L.R., Bondarko, L.V., & Verbitskaya, L.A. (1964). Acoustic characteristics of hard and soft consonants in Russian. Voprosy Fonetiki. Uchenye Zapiski LGU, (325), 28–36. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2023 Vikhrova A.Y., Lypkan T.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies