Discourse ethics as a foundation for development of thespeech personality of a future teacher

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of this article is in the approach to addressing the philosophical issue of discourse ethics from the perspective of communicative development and the personality development of the future education professional. The authors emphasized the communicative and ethical part of the interaction between partners. The study presented in the article has following objectives: to clarify the relation between the philosophical definition of “discourse ethics” and the field of pedagogical speech studies and to define the specificities of discourse ethics in pedagogical communication; to justify the significance of the communicative category of “speech act” in the discourse ethics of pedagogical interaction and to present the main features that distinguish the speech act from the speech activity; to identify and describe the specificity of discourse ethics in case of inquiry based learning; to characterize the speech personality of the teacher (academic advisor) primarily through the aspect of the moral and ethical norms of the academic culture, which he exercises. The study used the following theoretical methods: examination, analysis and comparative analysis of philosophical, culturological, psychological-pedagogical, speech-study, and methodical literature, language-semantic analysis of speech terms, as well as diagnostic methods: interview and questionnaire of teachers, schoolchildren, students; conversations (recorded) with teachers (academic advisors) and students-researchers; analysis of oral and written texts created by the subjects of inquiry based learning; analysis of the expert protocols of the school scientific and practical conferences; examination and summary of pedagogical experience. As a result of the study, the authors conclude, that in the course of pedagogical interaction the discourse ethics requires the participants to observe ethical, communicative and moral standards and to aim at creating an ideal language and speech situation, which the teacher and his speech acts ultimately broadcasts. The article introduces the main features that distinguish speech act from the speech action and justifies the importance of the “speech act” communicative category in discourse ethics. As a result of the review of the discourse ethics in the dimension of inquiry based learning the definition of the concept of “academic culture” is specified with regard to school academic discourse; the definition is given to the cultural and speech environment, essential for the formation and development of the moral and value component of the speech personality of the subject of the inquiry based learning; the most important techniques and methods for enculturation of the subjects of inquiry based learning are described; the three-tier model of the teacher’s (academic advisor’s) speech personality is presented. The authors note the importance of the stated problem in connection with the expansion of cross-cultural contacts and underline the significance of the theory of discourse ethics and its implementation at all its levels, which have an important influence on the communicative and moral development of future education professionals.

About the authors

Zoya I Kurtseva

Moscow State Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: zikurts@gmail.com

Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor, Department of rhetoric and culture of speech, Moscow state university of education. Research interests: speech culture of a person, culture of speech, speech act of a person, rhetoric and etic, pedagogical rhetoric, methods of teaching rhetoric, problems of continuous rhetorical education (preschool education - elementary school - secondary school - high school - university - post graduation education). Author of more than 150 scientific publications

M. Pirogovskaya str., 1/1, Moscow, Russia, 119991

Elena L Erokhina

Moscow State Pedagogical University

Email: lenusha@rambler.ru

Doctor of Pedagogics, Professor of the department of rhetoric and speech culture of MSPU. Research interests: rhetoric, pedagogical rhetoric, communication theory, theory and methodology of teaching rhetoric, theory and methodology of teaching Russian, education philosophy. Author of more than 100 scientific publications.

M. Pirogovskaya str., 1/1, Moscow, Russia, 119991

References

  1. Andreeva G.M. (1999). Sotsial’naya psikhologiya. [Social psychology]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ).
  2. Bakhtin M.M. (Voloshinov V.N.). (1993). Freidizm. Kommentarii V. Makhlina. [Freudism. Comments by V. Makhlin]. Moscow: Labirint Publ. (In Russ).
  3. Bogatov V.V. (2008). Etika v nauchnoi deyatel’nosti. Vestnik RAN. [Ethics in scientific activity. Herald of the RAS]. 1. 144—157. (In Russ).
  4. Gasparov B.M. (1996). Yazyk, pamyat’, obraz. Lingvistika yazykovogo sushchestvovaniya. [Language, memory, image. Linguistics of language existence]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russ).
  5. Gol’din V.E. & Dubrovskaya O.N. (2002). Zhanrovaya organizatsiya rechi v aspekte sotsial’nykh vzaimodeistvii. Zhanry rechi. [Genre organization of speech in the aspect of social interactions. Genres of speech]. (pp. 5—17). Saratov Publ. (In Russ).
  6. Guseinov A.A. (2002). Tseli i tsennosti: kak vozmozhen moral’nyi postupok? Eticheskaya mysl’. [Goals and values: how is a moral act possible? Ethical thought. 3]. Retrieved April 9 2016 from: https: // iphras.ru/elib/EM3_1.html
  7. Dem’yankov V.Z. (1989). Effektivnost’ argumentatsii kak rechevogo vozdeistviya. Problemy effektivnosti rechevoi kommunikatsii. [Effectiveness of argumentation as a speech influence. Problems of the effectiveness of speech communication]. (pp. 13—40). Moscow: INION AN SSSR Publ. (In Russ).
  8. Druzhinin V.N. (1997). Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. [Experimental psychology.] Moscow: INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ).
  9. Erokhina E.L. (2015). Akademicheskaya kul’tura sub’ektov issledovatel’skogo obucheniya. [Academic culture of subjects of research training]. (Author’s abstr. d-ra ped. diss. Moscow). (In Russ).
  10. Erokhina E.L. (2015). Metodologicheskie podkhody k obucheniyu sub’ektov issledovatel’skoi deyatel’nosti osnovam akademicheskoi kul’tury. [Methodological approaches to teaching subjects of research activities to the basics of academic]. Kazan academic journal. 4, 2. 298—300. (In Russ).
  11. Zhinkin N.I. (1998). Yazyk — rech’ — tvorchestvo. [Language — speech — creativity]. Selected works. Labirint Publ. (In Russ).
  12. Ippolitova N.A. (2012). Metodicheskii aspekt ucheniya o rechevykh zhanrakh. [The methodical aspect of the teaching of speech genres]. Primary school plus before and after. 8, 1—4. (In Russ).
  13. Kagan M.S. (2007). Nekotorye voprosy vzaimosvyazi filosofii i pedagogiki. Izbrannye Trudy. [Some issues of the relationship between philosophy and pedagogy. Selected works. 3]. 231—241. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis Publ. (In Russ).
  14. Karpov O.A. (2011). Kak organizovat’ issledovatel’skoe obuchenie shkol’nikov. [How to organize research training for schoolchildren. 2]. Public education. 36—42. (In Russ).
  15. Ivanova L.Yu., Skovorodnikova A.P. & Shiryaeva E.N. (2003). Kul’tura russkoi rechi. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’-spravochnik. [Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopedic dictionary-reference]. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka Publ. (In Russ).
  16. Kurtseva Z.I. (2011). Kommunikativno-nravstvennyi aspekt ritoricheskogo obrazovaniya. [Communicative-moral aspect of rhetorical education]. (Author’s abstr. d-ra ped. diss. Moscow). (In Russ).
  17. Lerner I.Ya. (1987). Chelovecheskii faktor i funktsii soderzhaniya obrazovaniya. Sovetskaya pedagogika. [The human factor and the functions of the content of education. Soviet pedagogy]. 11. 60—65. (In Russ).
  18. Lotman Yu.M. (1994). Besedy o russkoi kul’ture: Byt i traditsii russkogo dvoryanstva. [Conversations about Russian culture: Life and traditions of the russian nobility]. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb., 758 s (In Russ).
  19. Matveeva T.V. (2003). Uchebnyi slovar’: russkii yazyk, kul’tura rechi, stilistika, ritorika. [Educational dictionary: russian language, speech culture, style, rhetoric]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ. (In Russ).
  20. Mikhailova N.N. (1998). Kvalifikatsionnye trebovaniya k pedagogu, rabotayushchemu v sfere pedagogicheskoi podderzhki. Narodnoe obrazovanie. [Qualification requirements for a teacher working in the field of pedagogical support. Public education]. 6. 25—31. (In Russ).
  21. Mikhal’skaya A.K. (1996). Osnovy ritoriki: Mysl’ i slovo. [The Basics of Rhetoric: thought and word]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ. (In Russ).
  22. Murashov A.A. (1999). Tvorcheskoe vzaimodeistvie uchitelya i uchashchikhsya: ritoricheskoe obespechenie. [Creative interaction of teachers and students: rhetorical support]. (Author’s abstr. d-ra ped. diss. Moscow). (In Russ).
  23. Nazarchuk A.V. (2002). Etika globaliziruyushchegosya obshchestva. [The ethics of a globalizing society]. Moscow: Directmedia Publ. (In Russ).
  24. Ladyzhenskaya T.A. & Mihal’skaja A.K. (1998). Pedagogicheskoe rechevedenie. Slovar’-spravochnik. [Pedagogical Speech. Dictionary-reference.]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ. (In Russ).
  25. Rodzhers K. & Freiberg D. (2002). Svoboda uchit’sya. [Freedom to learn]. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ).
  26. Rozhdestvenskii Yu.V. (1995). O termine «ritorika». Ritorika. [About the term “rhetoric”. Rhetoric]. 1. 7—13. (In Russ).
  27. Savenkov A.I. (2007). Detskoe issledovanie kak metod obucheniya starshikh doshkol’nikov. Doshkol’noe obrazovanie. [Children’s study as a method of teaching older preschoolers. Preschool education. 21]. Retrieved September 9 2016 from: http://dob.1september.ru/view_article.php?ID=200702117
  28. Sedov K.F. (2003). Eticheskaya sostavlyayushchaya tipologii kul’tur. Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii. [Ethical component of the typology of cultures. Problems of verbal communication]. (pp. 193—201). Saratov: Sarat. Un-ta Publ. (In Russ).
  29. Sitnikova E.I. (2008). Obosnovanie diskursivnoi etiki K.-O. Apelem. [Rationale for the discursive ethics of K.-O. Apel. Vestnik Vyatka State University]. 4(4). 41—45. Kirov Publ. (In Russ).
  30. Sklyarova A.M. (2006). Eticheskie normy i printsipy nauchnoi deyatel’nosti. Bibliosfera. [Ethical norms and principles of scientific activity. Bibliosphera]. 3. 26—29. Moscow Publ. (In Russ).
  31. Denisov P.N., Zelenova N.K. & Kochneva E.M. (1983). Slovar’ sochetaemosti russkogo yazyka. [Dictionary of compatibility of the russian language]. Moscow: Rus. yaz. Publ. (In Russ).
  32. Tikhonov S.E. (2005). Ritorika, ritorizatsiya i obshchenie v shkole: osmyslenie i voploshchenie v period modernizatsii obrazovaniya. [Rhetoric, ritorizatsiya and communication in school: comprehension and implementation in the period of modernization of education]. Moscow: Prometei Publ. (In Russ).
  33. Khauzer M.D. (2008). Moral’ i razum: Kak priroda sozdala nashe universal’noe chuvstvo dobra i zla. [Morality and Reason: How nature created our universal sense of good and evil]. Moscow: Drofa Pudl. (In Russ).
  34. Shaklein V.M. (2012). Lingvokul’turologiya: traditsii i innovatsii: monografiya. [Lingvokulturologiya: traditions and innovations: monograph]. Moscow: Flinta Publ. (In Russ).
  35. Shmeleva T.V. (2003). Rechevoi akt. Kul’tura russkoi rechi: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’-spravochnik. [Speech act. Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopaedic dictionary-reference]. (pp. 571—572) Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ. (In Russ).
  36. Ershtein L.B. (2011). Nauchnoe rukovodstvo: teoriya, printsipy, praktika. [Scientific direction: theory, principles, practice]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGUNIPT Publ., 76 s (In Russ).
  37. Panov M.I. (2005). Effektivnaya kommunikatsiya: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. Slovar’-spravochnik. [Effective communication: history, theory, practice. Dictionary-reference]. Moscow Publ. (In Russ).
  38. Yasvin V.Ya. (2001). Obrazovatel’naya sreda: ot modelirovaniya k proektirovaniyu. [Educational environment: from modeling to design]. Moscow: Smysl Publ. (In Russ).
  39. Apel K.-O. (1988). Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das Problem des Ubergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Publ. (In Russ).
  40. Hartley J. (2008). Academic Writing and Publishing: A practical guide. London and New York: Routledge.

Copyright (c) 2018 Kurtseva Z.I., Erokhina E.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies