Historical Memory of Derivational and Form-building Affixes of Dagestanian Languages

Cover Page

Cite item


The article deals with the role of scientific etymology in restoring the origin of the word. The historical patterns, nature, and nature of the changes, development, and improvement of the language are analyzed. Attention is paid to the process of restoring historical memory as a powerful tool of knowledge. The article deals with the etymological semantics of the formants of the case system, the genesis of the ergative system, the historical memory of the class indicators of Avar language in correlation with the materials of other Dagestan languages. The paper examines the inner essence of language development in a comparative aspect. The importance of the concept of language development and the reconstruction of the forms of language units in both diachronic and synchronic terms is noted.

About the authors

Rumaniyat Omarovna Aselderova

Dagestan State Pedagogical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: rumomarovna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4261-6703

сandidate of philological science, associate professor

57, Magomed Yaragsky str., Makhachkala, 367003, Republic of Dagestan, Russian Federation


  1. Alpatov, V.M. 1993. “On anthropocentric and systemocentric approaches to language”. VYA 3: 15—28. Print. (In Russ.)
  2. Tolstaya, S.M. 2019. “Etymological memory of the word”. Etnolingwistyka 31. Problemy J zyka i Kultury 31: 21—26. Print. (In Russ.)
  3. Budagov, R.A. 1972. “On the subject of linguistics”. In Izvestiya AN SSSR. Department of Literature and Language. Vol. XXXI. Issue 5. Web. Access mode: www.philology.ru/linguistics1/ budagov-72.htm
  4. Toporov, V.N. 2006. “Rech i reka/rechka (from the field of imaginary etymological paradoxes)”. In Research on etymology and semantics. M.: Languages of Slavic Cultures publ. Pp. 198—223. Print. (In Russ.)
  5. Ufimtseva, A.A. 1977. Linguistic essence and aspects of the nomination. In Language category. General questions. Moscow: Nauka publ. Pp. 7—98. Print. (In Russ.)
  6. Kolesov, V.V. 2000. Ancient Rus: Heritage in the Word. The world of man. St. Petersburg. Pp. 9—10. Print. (In Russ.)
  7. Klimov, G.A. 1985. “On semantic reconstruction (based on the materials of Caucasian etymology)”. In Theory and practice of etymological research. Moscow: Nauka publ. Pp. 16—23. Print. (In Russ.)
  8. Uslar, P.K. 1889. Ethnography of the Caucasus. Linguistics. Vol. III. Avar language. Tiflis. Print.
  9. Zhirkov, L.I. 1955. Lak language. Phonetics and Morphology. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Print. (In Russ.)
  10. Gamzatov, G.G. 1992. Experience of dictionary work on Dagestani languages. In Caucasologie et Mythologie comparee. Paris. P. 465—475. Print.
  11. Murkelinskij, G.B. (Ed). 1971. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaya leksika dagestanskih yazykov. Moscow: Nauka publ., 1971. Print. (In Russ.)
  12. Klimov, G.A., Halilov M.SH. 2003. Slovar’ kavkazskih yazykov: sopostavlenie osnovnoj leksiki. Edited by Testelec Ya.G. Moscow: Vostochnaya literature publ., 2003. Print. (In Russ.)
  13. Komri, B., Khalilov, M. 2010. Dictionary of languages and dialects of the peoples of the North Caucasus. Comparison of the main vocabulary. Leipzig; Makhachkala. Print.
  14. Slovesnaya kul’tura Dagestana: logika formirovaniya, opyt tysyacheletiya. SHkola i proekty akademika G.G. Gamzatova. 2006. Mahachkala: Izd-vo DNC RAN publ. Print. (In Russ.)
  15. Gaidarov, R.I. 2005. Lezgi Chialan etymologiyadiz gyakhyun. Makhachkala: CPI DSU publ. Print.
  16. Murkelinsky, G.B. 1987. On the development of the case system in the Lak language. In Case composition and declension system in the Caucasian languages. Makhachkala: Dagestan Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences publ. Pp. 153—160. Print.
  17. Linguistic Encyclopedia. Ed. Yartsevoy V.N. Moscow: Sovetskaya enciklopediya publ. Print. (In Russ.)
  18. Abdullaev, I.Sh. 2003. Action as the being of the situation. On the problem of etymological semantics of the components of the content structure of the Dagestan verb. Makhachkala: CPI DSU publ.
  19. Bokarev, E.A. 1960. “On the reconstruction of the case system of the Pralezginsky language”. Voprosy grammatiki. Moscow-Leningrad: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR.
  20. Talibov, B.B. 1962. On some phonetic processes in the Lezgian language. In Uch. zapiski Institute of History, Language and Literature. Makhachkala: Dagestan branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences publ. Vol. II. Pp. 116—134.
  21. Alekseev, M.E. 1987. On the reconstruction of the Pralezginsky indicators of the indirect basis for the consonant. Case composition and declension system in the Caucasian languages. Makhachkala: Dagestan Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences publ. Pp. 223—229.
  22. Burchuladze, G.T. 1986. Basic questions of case composition and declension processes in the Lak language. Tbilisi: Metsniereba publ. Print.
  23. Ibragimova, M.O. 2016. “Comparative analysis of indicators of the indirect basis of declinable names in the Rutul language (on the material of dialects)”. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice1-1 (55): 118—121. Print.

Copyright (c) 2022 Aselderova R.O.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies