Compendium of types of the “typological” in sociology

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article presents an attempt to review the collective monograph Typological Analysis in Sociology as a Diagnostic Procedure (G.G. Tatarova, N.S. Babich, G.P. Bessokirnaya, A.V. Kuchenkova; ed. by G.G. Tatarova, A.V. Kuchenkova. Moscow: FCTAS RAS, 2023, 358 p.), which summarizes many years of searches and findings of G.G. Tatarova with her students and colleagues in the subject field of typological analysis as a sociological method, meta-methodology, diagnostic procedure and a special direction in the development of sociological methodology. The book reconstructs the general logic of the evolution of the typological method, once again confirming the interdisciplinary status of the sociological discipline as successfully borrowing and adapting philosophical conceptualizations, psychological approaches and tools of mathematical formalization to its own tasks. The authors provide examples to demonstrate the possibilities of typological analysis as a diagnostic procedure and a tool for working with “big data”, clarifying both the heuristic possibilities of its methodological solutions and inevitable “methodological traps”.

About the authors

I. V. Trotsuk

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: trostuk-iv@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Девятко И.Ф. Социологические теории деятельности и практической рациональности. М., 2003.
  2. Иванов Д. Эволюция социологии и эволюционное метатеорезирование // Телескоп. 2013. № 4.
  3. Иванов Д.В. Этапы эволюции социологии и доминантные типы теоретизирования // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 9.
  4. Папакостас А. Становление цивилизованной публичной сферы: Недоверие, доверие и коррупция. М., 2016.
  5. Татарова Г.Г. Методологическая травма социолога. К вопросу интеграции знания // Социологические исследования. 2006. № 9.
  6. Татарова Г.Г. Методология анализа данных в социологии (введение): Учебник. М., 1999.
  7. Татарова Г.Г. Основы типологического анализа в социологических исследованиях: Учебное пособие. М., 2007.
  8. Тернер Дж. Аналитическое теоретизирование // Thesis. 1994. Вып. 4.
  9. Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, 1992.
  10. Burawoy M. For public sociology // American Sociological Review. 2005. Vol. 70. No. 1.
  11. Lewis M.W., Smith W.K. Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope // Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2014. Vol. 50.
  12. Richardson L. Writing sociology // Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies. 2002. Vol. 2. No. 3.
  13. Ritzer G. Metatheorizing in sociology // Sociological Forum. 1990. No. 5.
  14. Ritzer G., Zhao Sh., Murphy J. Metatheorizing in sociology: The basic parameters and the potential contributions of postmodernism // Handbook of Sociological Theory / J.H. Turner (Ed.). University of California, 2001.
  15. Sztompka P. Focus on everyday life: A new turn in sociology // European Review. 2008. Vol. 16. No. 1.

Copyright (c) 2024 Trotsuk I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies