Civilizational identity of contemporary Russia: In search for research tools

Abstract

The failed catch-up development of Russia, which implied joining the ranks of developed, modernized countries, again raised the question of how much civilizational type determines either Western or one’s own path of development, and for Russia the latter means the values of collectivism and strong power. Under the confrontation between these two paths, the issues of identity (as a field of political aspirations of the elites and masses) become especially important and relevant for most post-Soviet countries which show a complex interaction of group interests and identities due to the spread of individualistic, market, predominantly rational (mostly materially interpreted) meanings of life. For Russia, this interaction has become a challenge - to continue development according to the Western model or to find one’s own path, which means a return to traditional values and collectivist ideology and a rejection of liberal ideology. The article considers the features of the Russian civilizational identity and the possibilities of studying them based on the empirical data. The author emphasizes the civilizational heterogeneity of the Russian society as deeply differentiated by most economic, social and cultural criteria, which divides society into groups with specific lifestyles and value systems. Russian civilization is a heterogeneous, not fully formed and still developing multi-subject entity united by the state preserving cultural, national, religious and linguistic diversity. The article is based on the results of the representative all-Russian sociological survey conducted in 2023 and regional surveys in frontier regions - in the Northwestern, Southern and North Caucasus Federal Districts. This data helps to identify the civilizational vector of the country’s development, proving the complementarity of the ideas of the elites and the rest of society, age and settlement cohorts, residents of central and frontier, mononational and multiethnic regions.

About the authors

L. A. Belyaeva

Institute of Philosophy of RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: bela46@mail.ru
Goncharnaya St., 12-1, Moscow, 109240, Russia

References

  1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokah i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Per. s angl. V. Nikolaeva; vstup. st. S.P. Bankovskoj. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  2. Belinskaya E.P. Sovremenne issledovaniya identichnosti: ot strukturnoj opredelennosti k protsessualnosti i nezavershennosti [Contemporary studies of identity: From structural certainty to processuality and incompleteness]. Vestnik SPbGU. Psikhologiya i Pedagogika. 2018; 8 (1). (In Russ.).
  3. Belyaeva L.A. Tsivilizacionnaya geterogennost Rossii. Sobstvennost v pole tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya [Civilizational heterogeneity of Russia. Property in the field of civilizational development]. Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii. 2021; 12 (3). (In Russ.).
  4. Gutsalov A.A. Russky tsivilizatsionny kod — identichnost, tsennosti, kultura [Russian civilizational code — identity, values, culture]. Teoreticheskaya Kulturologiya. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  5. Drobizheva L.M. Rossijskaya identichnost. Poiski opredeleniya i dinamika rasprostraneniya [Russian identity. Search for definition and dynamics of distribution]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2020; 8. (In Russ.).
  6. Mchedlova M.M. Rossijskaya tsivilizatsiya: vyzovy XXI veka [Russian Civilization: Challenges of the 21st Century]. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).
  7. Nikonov V.A. Sovremenny mir i ego istoki [Contemporary World and Its Origins]. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
  8. Panarin A.S. Rossiya v tsiklah mirovoj istorii [Russia in the Cycles of World History]. Moscow; 1999. (In Russ.).
  9. Rossijskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kn. 6 [Russian Society and Challenges of the Time. Book 6]. Pod red. M.K. Gorshkova, N.E. Tikhonovoj. Moscow; 2022. (In Russ.).
  10. Semennikova L.I. Rossiya v mirovom soobshchestve tsivilizatsij [Russia in the World Community of Civilizations]. Bryansk; 2000. (In Russ.).
  11. Smirnov A.V. Vsechelovechkskoe vs obshechelovecheskoe [All-Human vs Universal]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
  12. Sogomonov A. Grazhdanskoe obrazovanie i patriotizm [Civil education and patriotism]. Obshchaya Tetrad. 2014; 1. (In Russ.).
  13. Fedotova N.N. Na puti k protsessualnoj teorii identichnosti [On the way to the processual theory of identity]. Filosofskie Nauki. 2014; 11. (In Russ.).
  14. Habermas J. Problema legitimatsii pozdnego kapitalizma [Legitimation Problems in Late Capitalism]. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).
  15. Hachaturyan V.M. Chelovek v prostranstve tsivilizatsij: problema tsivilizatsionnoj identichnosti [Man in the space of civilization: Issues of civilizational identity]. Voprosy Sotsialnoj Teorii. 2010; IV. (In Russ.).
  16. Tsivilizatsiya: mnogozvuchie smyslov. Memoria [Civilization: Polyphonic Meanings. Memoria]. Otv. red., sost. A.V. Smirnov, N.A. Kasavina, S.A. Nikolsky. Moscow–Saint Petersburg; 2023. (In Russ.).
  17. Shemyakin Ya.G. Rossiya i Latinskaya Amerika kak tsivilizatsii: popytka sravneniya. Razmyshleniya nad knigami V.B. Zemskova [Russia and Latin America as civilizations: An attempt of comparison. Reflections on the books by V.B. Zemskov]. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2016; 1. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Belyaeva L.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies