Sociology of the body as an independent research direction: prerequisites for formation and subject field

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the contemporary society, under globalization, digitalization, urbanization and networkization, the body acquires new meanings, is included in new discourses and becomes a significant object of sociology. The article considers the possibility of sociology of the body as an independent scientific direction similar to such directions as sociology of medicine, sociology of sexuality, feminist sociology, sociology of sports, sociology of food and nutrition, sociology of aging, etc. The problem of the body has a long tradition of scientific research, and the author identifies the prerequisites for sociology of the body in various areas of social knowledge: philosophy, anthropology, psychology, and general sociology. The author describes four basic research fields in sociology of the body: body as an object of social control; issues of sex and gender; body as an object of consumption; body and technology - development of biotechnology and selftracking technologies. These thematic blocks of sociology of the body are not isolated from such related fields as sociology of medicine, sociology of sexuality, feminist sociology, etc. All directions in the sociological study of the body are interrelated; however, each of them, including sociology of the body, has its own research field. Thus, sociology of the body studies the body in all its diverse social manifestations; the body as an element of social structure and social action; mutual influence of the body and contemporary transformations, such as urbanization, globalization, digitalization, networkization, etc.; emerging social movements focusing on the construction of identity and of the individual corporal project. The body becomes a project that can/should be improved and promoted. The “formed” body reflects such life attitudes of the individual as a sense of style and taste, attitudes to health, self-control, etc. Thus, through the body, the individual creates one’s social representation and identity: the image of “I”.

About the authors

D. A. Starostina

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dasha-sta@yandex.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St.,6, Moscow,117198, Russia

References

  1. Ajvazova S.G. Simone de Beauvoir: etika podlinnogo sushchestvovaniya [Simone de Beauvoir: Ethics of open existence]. Zhenshchina v Rossijskom Obshchestve. 2014; 2. (In Russ.).
  2. Banizhe O.N. Zhenskaya telesnost kak kulturologicheskaya problema [Women’s corporality as a cultural problem]. Kulturnoe Nasledie Rossii. 2017; 2. (In Russ.).
  3. Belova A.V. Devichestvo rossijskoj dvoryanki XVIII — serediny XIX veka: telesnost, seksualnost, gendernaya identichnost [Girlhood of the Russian noblewoman in the 18th — mid19th centuries: Corporality, sexuality, gender identity]. Zhenshchina v Rossijskom Obshchestve. 2014; 2. (In Russ.).
  4. Boas F. Um pervobytnogo cheloveka [The Mind of Primitive Man]. Moscow; 1926. (In Russ.).
  5. Baudrillard J. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktury [The Consumer Society. Myths and Structures]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  6. Braidotti R. Polovoe razlichie kak politichesky proekt nomadizma [Sexual difference as a nomadic political project]. Khrestomatiya feministskih tekstov. Saint Petersburg; 2000. (In Russ.).
  7. Vodenko K.V., Degtyarev A.K. Gendernye stereotipy v sfere vysshego obrazovaniya: akademicheskoe liderstvo kak sposob nejtralizatsii sotsialnyh riskov [Gender stereotypes in higher education: Academic leadership as a way to neutralize social risks]. Zhenshchina v Rossijskom Obshchestve. 2020; 3. (In Russ.).
  8. Gerbut N.A., Gerbut I.A. Nedopredstavlennost zhenshchin v nazvaniyah ulits: gendernye narrativy gorodskih prostranstv [Underrepresentation of women in street names: Gender narratives of urban spaces]. Zhenshchina v Rossijskom Obshchestve. 2021; 4. (In Russ.).
  9. Giddens E., Sutton Ph. Osnovnye ponyatiya sotsiologii [Essential Concepts in Sociology]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
  10. Douglas M. Chistota i opasnost: Analiz predstavlenij ob oskvernenii i tabu [Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo]. Moscow; 2000. (In Russ.).
  11. Kimelev Yu.A. Filosofiya i sotsiologicheskaya teoriya. Sfery vzaimodejstviya [Philosophy and Sociological Theory. Fields of Interaction]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  12. Klimenkova T.A. Zhenshchina kak fenomen kultury. Vzglyad iz Rossii [Woman as a Cultural Phenomenon. Russian Perspective]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
  13. Koroleva T.A. Zhenskoe dvizhenie: genezis i evolyutsiya [Women’s movement: Genesis and evolution]. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 2013; 368. (In Russ.).
  14. Lyadova A.V. Sotsialnye faktory zdoroviya v usloviyah pandemii novoj koronavirusnoj infektsii [Social factors of health under the new coronavirus pandemic]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. 2021; 4. (In Russ.).
  15. Melnik G.S., Pantserev K.A. Gendernoe neravenstvo v sotsialnoj praktike i massovoinformatsionnom diskurse [Gender inequality in social practice and mass-media discourse]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. 2013; 4. (In Russ.).
  16. Merleau-Ponty M. Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. Saint Petersburg; 1999. (In Russ.).
  17. Mead M. Muzhskoe i zhenskoe. Issledovanie polovogo voprosa v izmenyayushchemsya mire [Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
  18. Mouss M. Tekhniki tela. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost. Trudy po sotsialnoj antropologii [Body Techniques. Society. Exchange. Personality. Works on Social Anthropology]. Moscow; 1996. (In Russ.).
  19. Nim E.G. Self-treking kak praktika kvantifikatsii telesnosti: kontseptualnye kontury [Selftracking as a practice of quantifying the body: Conceptual outlines]. Antropologichesky Forum. 2018; 38. (In Russ.).
  20. Novoselova E.N. K voprosu o roli sotsiologii v izuchenii i sokhranenii zdoroviya naseleniya Rossii [On the role of sociology in the study and preservation of the Russians’ health]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. 2017; 3. (In Russ.).
  21. Pivovarov A.M. Sotsiologiya tela v poiskakh svoej identichnosti: analiz issledovatelskih program [Sociology of body in search for its identity: Analysis of research programs]. Sotsiologichesky Zhurnal. 2019; 4. (In Russ.).
  22. Sillaste G.G. Gendernaya sotsiologiya i rossijskaya realnost [Gender Sociology and Russian Reality]. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  23. de Beauvoir S. Vtoroj pol [The Second Sex]. Saint Petersburg; 1997. (In Russ.).
  24. Sokolova E.T. Samosoznanie i samootsenka pri anomaliyah lichnosti [Self-Awareness and Self-Esteem in Personality Anomalies]. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ.).
  25. Starostina D.A. Formirovanie diskursa o tele v feministskih issledovaniyah: “vtoroj pol”, sub`ekt v protsesse, nomadicheskaya subektivnost [Formation of the discourse of body in feminist studies: “Second sex”, subject in the process, nomadic subjectivity]. Sotsiologiya. 2021; 6. (In Russ.).
  26. Strebkova Yu.A. Psikhologicheskie aspekty izucheniya telesnosti [Psychological aspects in the study of corporality]. Izvestiya Samarskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra RAN. 2008; 6–1. (In Russ.).
  27. Turner B. Sovremennye napravleniya razvitiya teorii tela [Recent developments in the theory of the body]. Thesis. 1994; 6. (In Russ.).
  28. Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnye metafory i “konstruktsiya” cheloveka v nauchnoy publitsistike o tele [Social metaphors and the human “construction” in the scientific publicism on the body]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2016; 2. (In Russ.).
  29. Trotsuk I.V., Morozova A.V. Simvolicheskie kody telesnosti: odezhda kak indikator transformatsiy sotsiokulturnyh praktik [Symbolic codes of the body: Clothes as an indicator of socio-cultural practices transformations]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2015; 2. (In Russ.).
  30. Foucault M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki [The Birth of Biopolitics]. Saint Petersburg; 1997. (In Russ.).
  31. Foucault M. Rozhdenie sotsialnoj meditsiny [The Birth of Social Medicine]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  32. Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoj revolyutsii [Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution]. Moscow; 1997. (In Russ.).
  33. Featherstone M. Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London–Newbury Park, 1991.
  34. Featherstone M. Post-Bodies, Ageing and Virtual Reality. Images of Ageing. London, 1995.
  35. Featherstone M. The body in consumer culture. Theory, Culture and Society. 1982; 1 (2).
  36. Featherstone M., Hepworth M., Turner B.S. The Body. Social Process and Cultural Theory. London; 1991.
  37. Flament M., Henderson K., Buchholz A. et al. Weight status and DSM-5 diagnoses of eating disorders in adolescents from the community. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2015; 54 (5).
  38. Gallagher S. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Clarendon Press; 2005.
  39. Kristeva J. From one identity to another. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York; 1980.
  40. Kristeva J. Powers of Horror. New York; 1982.
  41. Kristeva J. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York; 1984.
  42. Lupton D. Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design; 2014.
  43. Lupton D. The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Malden; 2016.
  44. Sprengnether M. The Spectral Mother: Freud, Feminism and Psychoanalysis. Ithaca; 1990.
  45. Trotsuk I.V. Complex concepts with varying connotations: In search for conceptual definitions. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2021; 21 (2).
  46. Polhemus T. Social Aspects of the Human Body. Harmondsworth; 1978.
  47. Witz A. Whose body matters? Feminist sociology and the corporeal turn in sociology and feminism. Body and Society. 2000; 6 (2).
  48. Wegren S.K., Nikulin A., Trotsuk I., Golovina S. Gender inequality in Russia’s rural informal economy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2017; 50.
  49. Wegren S.K., Nikulin A., Trotsuk I., Golovina S., Pugacheva M. Gender inequality in Russia’s rural formal economy. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2015; 31 (5).

Copyright (c) 2023 Starostina D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies