The dynamics of capitalism and the return of classes
- Authors: Anisimov R.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University for Humanities
- Issue: Vol 22, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 937-948
- Section: Sociological lectures
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/33221
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-4-937-948
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The growing social inequality and the abandonment of the welfare-state model raise the question of the return of classes to the historical arena. The author argues that the contemporary society can be characterized as capitalist due to its main structural element - a pattern of striving for profit; at the same time, the contemporary capitalist society has changed the vector of making profit from external expansion (search for new markets and centers of production) to internal intensity (automatization, increased exploitation, total commodification, removal of institutional barriers to profit). Today, capitalism has exhausted the possibilities of external expansion and is changing its strategy to the restructuring of social systems and its actors, which is accompanied by the abandonment of the welfare-state model and by the growing instability in labor relations. This leads to the situation in which middle classes disappear and social inequality grows. The concept of classes developed by K. Marx has regained its importance, since the theories created in the middle of the 20th century no longer correspond to the contemporary realities. The article revises the Marxist class model, in particular the author argues that the type of ownership is no longer a key differentiating criterion, and capitalists and proletarians are no longer the main classes of the contemporary society. The classes of employers and precariat are more relevant for describing the contemporary society. The ideas of these two classes also differ: the precariat strives to preserve social guarantees and labor rights; while employers, on the contrary, strive to maximize profits by reducing social guarantees and violating labor rights.
About the authors
R. I. Anisimov
Russian State University for Humanities
Author for correspondence.
Email: ranisimov@list.ru
Miusskaya Sq., 6, Moscow, 125993, Russia
References
- Anisimov R.I. Precariat kak novy sotsialny klass v kontekste marksistskoj teorii [Precariat as a new social class in the context of the Marxist theory]. Sotsiologichesky Zhurnal. 2021; 27 (1). (In Russ.).
- Bauman Z. Idet li bogatstvo nemnogih na polzu vseh prochih? [Does the Richness of the Few Benefit Us All?]. Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
- Wallerstein I. Mirosistemny analiz: Vvedenie [World-System Analysis: An Introduction]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
- Collins R. Sredny klass bez raboty: vykhody zakryvayutsya [Middle class without work: Exits close]. Est li budushchee u kapitalizma? Moscow; 2015. (In Russ.).
- Creveld M. van. Rastsvet i upadok gosudarstva [The Rise and Decline of the State]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
- Marx K., Engels F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. V 2 tt. T.1 [Selected Works in 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow; 1955. (In Russ.).
- Popov A., Solovieva T. Precarizatsiya zanyatosti: analiz nauchnogo diskursa o sushchnosti i vektorah izmereniya [Precarization of employment: Analysis of the academic discourse on the essence and ways of its measurement]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2020; 9. (In Russ.).
- Toshchenko Zh. (Ed.). Precariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa [Precariat: Emergence of a New Class]. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
- Standing G. Precariat: novy opasny klass [The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).
- Fishman L.G., Martiyanov V.S., Davydov D.A. Rentnoe obshchestvo: v teni truda, kapitala i demokratii [Rental Society: In the Shadow of Labor, Capital and Democracy]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
- Hines A. Getting ready for a postwork future. Foresight and STI Governance. 2019; 13 (1).
- Jørgensen M. Precariat — what it is and is not — towards an understanding of what it does. Critical Sociology. 2016; 42 (7–8).
- Neilson B., Rossiter N. Precarity as a political concept or Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society. 2008; 25 (7–8).
- Standing G. Basic Income, and How We Can Make It Happen. London; 2017.
- Wright E.O. Is the precariat a class? Global Labor Journal. 2016; 7 (2).