Email this article 
Development of pre-class society in the evolutionist interpretation
- Authors: Davydov S.A1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
- Issue: Vol 20, No 3 (2020)
- Pages: 655-668
- Section: Sociological lectures
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/24543
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-655-668
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article aims at systematization of approaches to understanding the evolution of pre-class society in historical sociology. The sociological tradition of interpreting the history of pre-class society developed in the late 18th century, when A. Ferguson defined the development of society as a natural process consisting of three stages: savagery, barbarism, and civilization. In classic sociology, there were two approaches to understanding the pre-class society evolution. The first approach is presented in the works of H. Spencer, who suggested a natural-scientific interpretation of social evolution but with a more elaborated scale of the development of pre-class societies - as differing by the complexity of their social structure. The second approach is presented in the research of L.H. Morgan, who used Ferguson’s three-stage periodization as a basis but expanded the list of fundamental criteria for their differentiation (progress in inventions and discoveries, ideas of management, family and property). In the middle of the 20th century, sociology managed to overcome its dependence on psychology and economics by neo-evolutionism that linked social evolution of the archaic society with qualitative changes in its structure. Sociologists proposed schemes for the evolution of pre-class society based on the empirical evidence of its complexity - institutionalization of leadership and increasing social inequality. Moreover, sociologists included the level of labor productivity achieved in the archaic society into the list of criteria for its development, which determined a single scale of progress even for societies with other types of social organization. After debates, sociologists came to the conclusion that the evolution of pre-class societies is determined not only by their development but also by their degradation and even collapse; that all social systems can have analogues with a comparable level of complexity; and that a certain level of social organization can be achieved by different evolutionary paths.
About the authors
S. A Davydov
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: licurg@inbox.ru
доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры социологии и управления персоналом
Sadovaya St., 21, Saint Petersburg, 191023, RussiaReferences
- Бондаренко Д.М., Гринин Л.Е., Коротаев А.В. Альтернативы социальной эволюции // Раннее государство, его альтернативы и аналоги. Волгоград, 2006 / Bondarenko D.M., Grinin L.E., Korotaev A.V. Alternativy socialnoj evolyutsii [Alternatives of social evolution]. Rannee gosudarstvo, ego alternativy i analogi. Volgograd; 2006 (In Russ.).
- Гоббс Т. Левиафан или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского. М., 2001 / Hobbes T. Leviafan ili Materiya, forma i vlast gosudarstva tserkovnogo i grazhdanskogo [Leviathan, or The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil]. Moscow; 2001 (In Russ.)
- Гринин Л.Е. Аналоги раннего государства: альтернативные пути эволюции // Личность. Культура. Общество. 2007. Вып. 1 / Grinin L.E. Analogi rannego gosudarstva: alternativnye puti evolyutsii [Analogues of the early state: Alternative paths of evolution]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo. 2007; 1 (In Russ.).
- Дюркгейм Э. О разделение общественного труда / Пер. с фр. А.Б. Гофмана, прим. В.В. Сапова. М., 1996 / Durkheim E. O razdelenie obshchestvennogo truda [The Division of Labor in Society]. Trasl. by A.B. Gofman, comm. V.V. Saponov. Moscow; 1996 (In Russ.).
- Кабо В.Р. Первобытная доземледельческая община. М., 1986 / Kabo V.R. Pervobytnaya dozemledelcheskaya obshchina [Primitive Pre-agricultural Community]. Moscow; 1986 (In Russ.).
- Коротаев А.В. Социальная эволюция: факторы, закономерности, тенденции. М., 2003 / Korotaev A.V. Socialnaya evolyutsiya: faktory, zakonomernosti, tendentsii [Social Evolution: Factors, Patterns, Trends]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).
- Коротаев А.С. Апология трайбализма: племя как форма социально-политической организации сложных непервобытных обществ (по материалам Северо-Восточного Йемена) // Социологический журнал. 1995. № 4 / Korotaev A.S. Apologiya trajbalizma: plemya kak forma socialno-politicheskoj organizatsii slozhnyh nepervobytnyh obshchestv (po materialam Severo-Vostochnogo Yemena) [Apology of tribalism: Tribe as a form of the social-political organization of complex non-primitive societies (based on the data from North-Eastern Yemen). Sociologichesky Zhurnal. 1995; 4 (In Russ.).
- Маркс К. К критике политической экономии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Собр. соч. Т. 13. М., 1959 / Marx K. K kritike politicheskoj ekonomii [A contribution to the critique of political economy]. Marx K., Engels F. Sobr. soch. Vol. 13. Moscow; 1959 (In Russ.).
- Мешков К. Ю. Филиппины // Чебоксаров Н.Н., Кузнецов А.И. (ред.). Малые народы Индонезии, Малайзии и Филиппин. М., 1982 / Meshkov K.Yu. Filippiny [Philippines]. Cheboksarov N.N., Kuznetsov A.I. (Ed.). Malye narody Indonezii, Malajzii i Filippin. Moscow; 1982 (In Russ.).
- Морган Л.Г. Древнее общество, или исследование линий человеческого прогресса от дикости через варварство к цивилизации // Материалы по этнографии. Т. 1. Л., 1934 / Morgan L.H. Drevnee obshchestvo ili issledovanie linij chelovecheskogo progressa ot dikosti cherez varvarstvo k tsivilizatsii [Ancient society, or Researches in the lines of human progress from savagery, through barbarism to civilization]. Materialy po etnografii. Leningrad; 1934. Vol. 1 (In Russ.).
- Морган Л.Г. Древнее общество: Исследование линий человеческого прогресса от дикости через варварство к цивилизации / Под ред. М.О. Косвена. М., 2016 / Morgan L.H. Drevnee obshchestvo: Issledovanie linij chelovecheskogo progressa ot dikosti cherez varvarstvo k tsivilizatsii [Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery, through Barbarism to Civilization]. Ed. by M.O. Kosven. Moscow; 2016 (In Russ.).
- Мэйн Г. Древнейшая история учреждений: Лекции. М., 2011 / Maine H. Drevnejshaya istoriya uchrezhdenij: Lektsii [Lectures on the Early History of Institutions]. Moscow; 2011 (In Russ.).
- Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. М., 2000 / Parsons T. O strukture socialnogo dejstviya [The Structure of Social Action]. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).
- Спенсер Г. Личность и государство. Челябинск, 2007 / Spencer H. Lichnost i gosudarstvo [The Man versus the State]. Chelyabinsk; 2007 (In Russ.).
- Тённис Ф. Общность и общество. Основные понятия чистой социологии / Пер. с нем. Д.В. Скляднева. М.-СПб., 2002 / Tönnies F. Obshchnost i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoj sociologii [Community and Society]. Transl. by D.V. Sklyadnev. Moscow-Saint-Petersburg; 2002 (In Russ.).
- Энгельс Ф. Манифест коммунистической партии. Предисловие к немецкому изданию 1883 г. // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Собр. соч. T. 21. М., 1959 / Engels F. Manifest kommunisticheskoj partii. Predislovie k nemetskomu izdaniyu 1883 g. [Communist Manifesto (Preface)]. Marx K., Engels F. Sobr. soch. Vol. 21. Moscow; 1959 (In Russ.)
- Brumfiel E. Aztec state making: Ecology, structure, and the origin of the state. American Anthropologist. 1983; 85.
- Carneiro R.L. The chiefdom: Precursor of the state. Jones G.D., Kautz R.R. (Eds.). The Transition to Statehood in the New World. New York; 1981.
- Carneiro R.L. The four faces of evolution. Honigman J.J. (Ed.). Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Chicago; 1973.
- Carneiro R.L., Grinin l.E., Korotayev A.V. Chiefdoms: Yesterday and Today. New York; 2017.
- Claessen H.J.M., Skalnik P. (Eds.). The Early State. Hague; 1978.
- Claessen H.J.M., van de Velde P., Smith M.E. (Eds.). Development and Decline: The Evolution of Sociopolitical Organization. South Hadley; 1985.
- Costin C.L., Earle T.K. Status distinction and legitimation of power as reflected in changing patterns of consumption in late prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity. 1989; 54.
- Davies M. Wittfogel’s dilemma: Heterarchy and ethnographic approaches to irrigation management in Eastern Africa and Mesopotamia. World Archaeology. 2009; 41 (1).
- Delanty G. Sociology. Ritzer G. (Ed.). The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Oxford; 2009.
- Dietrich W. (Ed.). The Early Monarchy in Israel: The Tenth Century B.C. Atlanta; 2007.
- Ferguson A. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Basil; 1789.
- Fried M.H. The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology. New York; 1967.
- Johnson A.W., Earle T.K. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State. Stanford; 2000.
- Lowie R.H. The Origin of the State. New York; 1927.
- Oberg K. Types of social structure among the lowland tribes of South and Central America. American Anthropologist. 1955; 57.
- Sahlins M.D. Evolution: specific and general. Sahlins M.D., Service E.R. (Eds.). Evolution and Culture. Ann Arbor; 1960.
- Sahlins M.D., Service E.R. (Eds.). Evolution and Culture. Ann Arbor; 1960.
- Sahlins M. Poor man, rich man, big man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies on Society and History. 1963; 5 (3).
- Service E.R. Primitive Social Organization. New York; 1971.
- Service E.R. Primitive Social Organization. An Evolutionary Perspective. New York; 1962.
- Shifferd P.A. Aztecs and Africans. Political processes in twenty-two early states. Claessen H.J.M., van de Velde P. (Eds.). Early State Dynamics. Leiden; 1987.
- Spencer H. Social Statics. New York; 1851.
- Spencer H. The Evolution of Society: Selections from Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Sociology. Chicago; 1967.
- Voget F.W. A History of Ethnology. New York; 1975.
- White L.A. The Science of Culture. A Study of Man and Civilization. New York; 1949.
- White L.A. Foreword. Sahlins M.D., Service E.R. (Eds.). Evolution and Culture. Ann Arbor; 1960.
- Yoffee N. The decline and rise of Mesopotamian civilization: An ethno-archaeological perspective on the evolution of social complexity. American Antiquity. 1979; 44.
