Morphological Methods of Noun-Origin Derivatives Creation in Secondary Root Formation in the Modern Standard Arabic Language

Abstract

The study is devoted to the topic of Arabic generic derivatives formed from nouns аccording to Masdar models of four-letter bases from names of states, organizations, their abbreviations, which is little represented in the academic literature. The authors set a goal to analyze and generalize the features and methods of secondary root formation in the Arabic on the material of the lexical corpus of derivatives grouped by semantic and word-formation identity. The data source was the texts of modern Arabic-language media. Sixty-six lexemes-neologisms with the general semantics of the process or state and formed according to the Masdar models of the fourletter basis were selected by the continuous sampling method. The selected lexemes were examined in asynchronous aspect and were subjected to lexico-morphological analysis. It was concluded that all the studied neologisms were formed on a morphological basis. The leading method is lexical derivation, which can proceed with the participation of word-forming formants, phonetic expanders, gemination of the root element, and without suffixation. All lexical derivatives were formed along the traditional path known and described by historians of the Arabic. The process examined in the article turned out to be analogous to the hypothesis of the formation of three-letter bases based on two root consonants accepted in Arabic studies. This allowed the authors suggest that new fourletter bases appear from existing three-letter roots, which over time can potentially become the base of four-letter roots, which will lead to the expansion of Arabic roots and the formation of new word-formation nests.

About the authors

Tatiana A. Vavichkina

RUDN University

Email: vavichkina-ta@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3474-5820
SPIN-code: 3701-8589

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

Karen N. Stepanyan

RUDN University

Email: stepanyan-kn@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9223-9833
SPIN-code: 3700-3485

Senior teacher of additional education of the Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

Yulia E. Vlasova

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vlasova-yue@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4311-3403
SPIN-code: 9634-3567

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117198

References

  1. Tuleubaeva, S.A. (2019). On the modern language situation in Arabic countries. Eurasian Arabic Studies, 8, 45–56. (In Russ.).
  2. Sharbatova, A.G. (2008). Arabic Literary Language and New Environment of Functioning: Internet, Latest Technologies and New Industries. In: Arabic Philology. Iss. 3. Moscow: Kluch-S. pp. 353–376. (In Russ.).
  3. Davydova, S.V. (2011). Language of Mass Media, Lingua mobilis, 2(28), 93–96. (In Russ.).
  4. Aivazyan, y.S. (2011). The theoretical aspects of nominative processes in Modern Literary Arabic, Russian Journal of Linguistics, 1, 33–40. (In Russ.).
  5. Tyureva, L.S. (2021). Means of formation of neologisms in modern Arabic Literary Language. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 10(852), 163–181. https://doi. org/10.52070/2542-2197_2021_10_852_163 (In Russ.).
  6. Melyancev, A.N. (1990). Masdar in the theory and structure of the Arabic language. Moscow: MSU Press. (In Russ.).
  7. Gamal, L. (1975). Fundamentals of word classification in Arabic and Russian grammar traditions [dissertation]. Мoscow. (In Russ.).
  8. Zvegintsev, V.A. (2007). History of Arabic Linguistics. Brief essay. Moscow: Combook. (In Russ.).
  9. Khairutdinov, A.G. (2009). History of the Arabic language. Moscow: VKN-press. (In Russ.).
  10. Omarov, A.A. (2008). Morphological and syntactic features of the Masdar of the Dargin and Arabic languages [dissertation]. Makhachkala. (In Russ.).
  11. Belova, А.G. (1999). Essays on the history of the Arabic language. Moscow, Eastern literature. (In Russ.).
  12. Grande, B.M. (1998). The course of Arabic grammar in comparative historical coverage. Moscow: Eastern literature. (In Russ.).
  13. Meisel, S.S. (1983). Ways of development of the root fund of the Semitic languages. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  14. Starinin, V.P. (1963). The structure of Semitic words. Мoscow. (In Russ.).
  15. Jushmanov, N.V. (1998). Selected works: Works on General phonetics, Semitology and classical Arabic morphology. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  16. Smirnov, A.V. (2015). Consciousness. Logics. Language. Culture. Meaning. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture. (In Russ.).
  17. Usmanov, T.I. (2020). Nakh masdar in comparison with action names in languages with different structures. [dissertation]. Grozny. (In Russ.).
  18. Mingazova, N.G., Safin, M.F. & Zafirov, R.R. (2019). Comparative grammar of English and Arabic languages. P. 2. Kazan: KFU Publ. (In Russ.).
  19. Abdulzhalilov, I.G., Khalunov, A.N. & Magomedova (Gasanova), Z.A. (2017). The comparative analysis of the Arabic Masdar (Verbal Noun) and the English Gerund for Methodological Purposes. Philology. Theory & Practice, 5 (201–1), 47–49. (In Russ.).
  20. Zamalieva, G.H. (2016). Functioning of Masdar in Arabic Language. Minbar. Islamic Studies, 9(1), 62–65. (In Russ.).
  21. Ryding, K.C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
  22. Abdullina, L.B. & Abdullina, G.R. (2019). Comparative study of the terminological field and professional discourse in languages with different structures. Ufa: RIC of BashSU. (In Russ.).
  23. Ayvazyan, y.S. (2012). Morphological Derivation in Primary Nominative Units in Modern Arabic. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2(23), 220–222. https://doi. org/10.24833/2071-8160-2012-2-23-220-222 (In Russ.).
  24. Sharbatov, G.Sh. (2003). The role of secondary root formation in the development of the vocabulary of everyday Arabic languages. In: Eastern Linguistics. Moscow: Eastern literature. pp. 315–322. (In Russ.).
  25. Ivanova, М.А. (2003). Active Root Formation Processes in Modern Arabic Common-Spoken Languages and Dialects (Comparative Analysis) [dissertation]. Мoscow. (In Russ.).
  26. Shalina, L.V. (2007). On the question of the essence of neologism in modern linguistics. Proceedings of PSU im. V.G. Belinsky, 8, 73–77. (In Russ.).
  27. Alatortseva, S.I. (1999). Problems of Neology and Russian Neography [dissertation]. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  28. Baranov, H.K. (2006). Large Arabic-Russian Dictionary. In 2 vols. Moscow: Living language. (In Russ.).
  29. Multilingual dictionary and glossary of meanings and fields URL: https://www.almaany.com/ (accessed: 26.08.2023). (In Arabic).
  30. Alimdzhanova, Z.N. (2010). Arabic lexicology. Tashkent. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2024 Vavichkina T.A., Stepanyan K.N., Vlasova Y.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies