Folk orthology in the digital environment

Abstract

In the digital era, folk orthologs (language normalizers who are not professional in the quality of speech, the choice of criteria, and the codified norm) have received unlimited access to the electronic publication of their opinions, which has come to the attention of scientists. The relevance of the proposed topic is determined by the need to popularize traditional cultural values, in particular, knowledge of the Russian language. The purpose of the study is to find out the motives of folk orthologs and the norm criteria used in their rulemaking, degree of objectivity, the correspondence of their opinions to scientific ideas and the level of literacy in their statements. The research material was based on judgments about the language of non-professional linguists available at online forums (public dialogues) about the Russian language. The method of content analysis was used, including the search and selection of judgments of folk orthologs, as well as the analysis of linguistic material from the perspective of compliance with norms in linguistic dictionaries. The results of the study showed both the lack of knowledge of folk orthologs about the Russian language and their demand for this knowledge. The motives for their activities were identified - interest in the language and its protection, self-realization, leisure time, and also the main areas of activity of folk orthologs - rulemaking, and the search for norms in spelling, vocabulary and grammar. This knowledge made it possible to propose recommendations for a possible dialogue between scientists and folk orthologs.

About the authors

Sergei V. Likhachev

Kokand State Pedagogical Institute

Author for correspondence.
Email: lihachovs@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5339-4352
SPIN-code: 2296-3554

Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Russian Language and Literature Department

23 Turon St, Kokand, 150700, Republic of Uzbekistan

Elena I. Popova

Kokand State Pedagogical Institute

Email: elena.popova.11@internet.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8390-1992
SPIN-code: 3120-9964

Associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Literature

23 Turon St, Kokand, 150700, Republic of Uzbekistan

References

  1. Антонова О.В. Варианты русского ударения: кодификация и узус (паж, пан, партер) // Русская речь. № 6. С. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170023733-5
  2. Басалаева Е.Г., Шпильман М.В. Русская орфография и пунктуация сквозь призму наивного сознания // Сибирский филологический журнал. 2016. № 3. С. 59–69. https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/56/6
  3. Викторова Е.Ю. Лингвокреативный потенциал интернет-коммуникации (на материале жанра социальных сетей) // Жанры речи. 2018. № 4 (20). С. 294–303. https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2018-4-20-294-303
  4. Гаврилова К.А. Конференция «”Народная лингвистика“ – взгляд носителей языка на язык» // Антропологический форум. 2013. № 18. С. 423–443.
  5. Горбачевич К.С. Нормы современного русского литературного языка. 3-е изд. М. : Просвещение, 1989. 208 с.
  6. Гулида В.Б. Конференция «„Народная лингвистика“ – взгляд носителей языка на язык» // Вопросы языкознания. 2013. № 5. С. 136–144.
  7. Добрушина Е.Р., Сичинава Д.В. Кочующая норма, или Микродиахронические похождения слова ихний в русском, украинском и белорусском языках // Вопросы языкознания. 2015. № 2. С. 41–54.
  8. Ким И.Е. Письмо и правописание, графика и орфография : где проходит граница между системой и нормой // Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия : История, филология. 2014. Т. 13. № 9. С. 12–15.
  9. Милославский И.Г. Человек : пол неизвестен, а род мужской, и это не сексизм // Русская речь. 2017. № 1. С. 50–59.
  10. Нечаева И.В. Языковые изменения и принципы орфографического нормирования (на материале иноязычных неологизмов) // Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Труды института лингвистических исследований. 2012. Т. 8. № 3. С. 325–336.
  11. Радбиль Т.Б. Активные процессы в синтаксисе современной русской речи в свете лингвосемиотической и лингвокогнитивной интерпретации // Критика и семиотика. 2021. № 1. С. 127–144. https://doi.org/10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-127-144
  12. Тарланов З.К. Интуиция и языковая норма // Русская речь. 2016. № 4. С. 75–81.
  13. Хакимова Е.М. Некодифицированные употребления прописных/строчных букв в текстах массовой коммуникации // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2018. № 56. С. 166–186. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/56/9
  14. Andrews K. The folk psychological spiral : explanation, regulation, and language // The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2015. Vol. 53. Pp. 50–67.
  15. Dieser E. Some “cases of doubt” in Russian grammar from different methodical perspectives // Slavic Languages in Psycholinguistics : Chances and Challenges for Empirical and Experimental Research. 2016. Vol. 554. Pp. 151.
  16. Dubinina I.Y., Malamud S.A. Emergent communicative norms in a contact language : indirect requests in heritage Russian // Linguistics. 2017. Vol. 55. No. 1. Pp. 67–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0039
  17. Duskaeva L.R. Speech etiquette in online communities : medialinguistics analysis // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 1. Pp. 56–79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-56-79
  18. Juldyz S., Dinara M. Normalizing a new language hierarchy : event names in post-Soviet urban space // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 4. Pp. 1004–1023. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-4-1004-1023
  19. Kadilina O.A., Ryadchikova E.N. Strong, weak and average linguistic personality in communicative-pragmatic and linguoculturological aspects // RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 859–882. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2018-9-4-859-882
  20. Locher M.A., Larina T.V. Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2019. Vol. 23. No. 4. Pp. 873–903. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2019-23-4-873-903
  21. Read A.W. An account of the word ‘Semantics’ // Word. 1948. Vol. 4. No. 2. Pp. 78–97.

Copyright (c) 2024 Likhachev S.V., Popova E.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies