Nation-building and Writing System: Mongol Bichig in Linguistic Landscape of Ulaanbaatar

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This study examines the linguistic landscape of Ulaanbaatar, the capital of Mongolia, in relation to the country’s current nation-building processes, which are closely intertwined with the introduction of the classical Mongolian writing system, Mongol Bichig , into official documentation and school education. The author relies on the method of photographing linguistic landscape units in the center of Ulaanbaatar and on surveys revealing public opinion on Mongol Bichig and people’s linguistic competence in it. The research shows a natural time lag between the intentions of the government and Mongolian society and the actual presence of Mongol Bichig in the linguistic landscape and everyday linguistic practices. The issue of Mongol Bichig is considered within the broad historical and linguistic context showing past and present efforts to construct national identity, currently building it on the original writing system. The research shows a natural time lag between the intentions of the government and Mongolian society and the actual presence of Mongol Bichig in the linguistic landscape and everyday linguistic practices. So far, Mongol Bichig performs mostly symbolic function. Its symbolic representations in the linguistic landscape of Mongolian capital are driven not only by historical memory, ideas of national identity and patriotism, but also by the strategies of commodification of national identity in the form of marketing of authenticity and locality.

About the authors

Erzhen V. Khilkhanova

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: erzhen.khilkhanova@iling-ran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9369-343X

Doctor of Philology, Assistant professor, leading researcher of Research Center on Ethnic and Language Relations

1 Bolshoy Kislovsky Lane, Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation

References

  1. Backhaus, P. 2007. Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Print.
  2. Hult, F.M. 2018. “Language policy and planning and linguistic landscapes.” In Oxford handbook of language policy and planning, edited by J.W. Tollefson and M. Pérez-Milans. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 333-351. Print.
  3. Barakos, E., and J. Unger. 2016. Discursive approaches to language policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Print. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53134-6
  4. Blommaert, J., and I. Maly. 2019. “Digital Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis (ELLA 2.0).” Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies. URL: https://www.academia.edu/41105061/ Digital Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis (ELLA 2.0).
  5. Blommaert, J. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/97817 83090419
  6. Chernyavskaya, V.E. 2023. “They call the main entrance a porch”: social meaning in semantics and metapragmatics.” Slovo.ru: baltic accent, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 72-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-5 EDN: CNSNOC
  7. Chernyavskaya, V.E. 2023. “Typography as Social Index: Soviet Landscape in the Modern Russian Discourse.” ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 50-73. URL: http://praxema.tspu.edu.ru/archive.html?year=2023&issue=2&article_id=8715 https://doi.org/10.23951/2312-7899-2023-2-50-73 EDN: OQFRMN
  8. Landry, R., and R.Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 1, no. 16, pp. 23-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002
  9. Gruntov, I.A. 2017. “Mongolian writing.” Big Russian Encyclopedia. Electronic version, 25 March 2024, https://old.bigenc.ru/linguistics/text/2226967?ysclid=lvkxirt3b2544844170
  10. Khilkhanova, E.V., and V.V. Ivanov. 2023. “The commodification of languages and linguistic landscape of the capital of Mongolia.” Sociolinguistics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-2-14-129-153
  11. Khilkhanova, E.V. 2024. “The Linguistic Landscape of Ulaanbaatar: what signs and people tell about.” Mongolian Studies (Elista), vol. 3, no. 16, pp. 591-609. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2024-3-591-609 EDN: DCMTWZ
  12. Yukiyasu, A. 2021. “Integration and division of the “language”: language policy of the Mongolian peoples in the USSR and Mongolia in 1920-1940.” Sociolinguistics, vol. 5, no.1 [online], pp. 9-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-2021-1-5-9-30 EDN: SMWDTP
  13. Zheleznyakov, A.S., D. Baasansuren, and I.L. Nedyak, “Modern Mongolia’s multi-fulcrum policy through the prism of the Russian policy’s oriental vector.” Polis. Political Studies, 2013, no. 5, pp. 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386
  14. Cenoz, J., and D. Gorter. 2006. “Linguistic Landscape and Minority Languages.” International Journal of Multilingualism, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710608668386
  15. Blackwood, R., and S. Tufi. 2015. The Linguistic Landscape of the Mediterranean: French and Italian Coastal Cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Print. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781 137314567
  16. Gorter, D. 2018. “Methods and techniques for linguistic landscape research: About definitions, core issues and technological innovations.” In: Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Multi-lingualism, Language Policy and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource, edited by M. Pütz and N. Mundt. Bristol: Multilingual Matter, pp. 38-57. Print. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922166-005
  17. Mikhalev, A.V. 2010. “The Ethno-Political Situation in Post-Socialist Mongolia.” Proceedings of the Altai State University. Series: History, Political Science, vol. 68/2, no. 4/2, pp. 160-165. (In Russ.) EDN: LSZADC
  18. Terentyev, V. 2015. “State policy of nation-building in Mongolia and the formation of ethnic self-conscience of western Mongols.” BSU Bulletin. Humanities Research of Inner Asia, no. 2, pp. 11-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18101/2306-753X-2015-2-11-20 EDN: VEBZPD
  19. Mongush, M. 2003. “Bogdo-gegen known and unknown.” Oriental collection, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 118-123.
  20. Tomtogtokh, G. 2015. “Russian in the socio-cultural space of modern Mongolia.” Linguistics and intercultural communication, vol.18, no. 4, pp. 208-213. (In Russ.) EDN: UZCHFZ
  21. Erdenemaam, S. 2014. “About the status of the Russian language in Mongolia and interferential mistakes made by Mongolian students.” Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 138-143. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1403.14 EDN: SFDVED
  22. Tsybenova Ch.S., G.A. Dyrkheeva, V.G. Zhalsanova, Ts. Sarantsatsral, and Ts. Tsogzolmaa. 2023. In: The Russian language in Mongolia: the sphere of education [Collective monograph], edited by G. A. Dyrheeva, Ts. Sarantsatsral. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (Sib. Branch) of RAS, Print. (In Russ. and Mong.)
  23. Dyrkheeva, G.A., Ch.S. Tsybenova, S. Cerenchimed, and E. Dashdondog. 2021. “Russian in Mongolian education system: state, dynamics, problems.” Sociolinguistics, no. 1, [online], pp. 31-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37892/2713-2951-2021-1-5-31-48
  24. Ariungua, N. 2022. “Mongolia and the policy of ‘soft power’: historical aspects.” In: “Soft power” policy in Russia-Mongolia relationship [collective monograph], edited by V. A. Rodionov, A. Nyamdoljin. Irkutsk: Publishing house ‘‘Ottisk’’, pp. 30-45. Print.
  25. Dyrkheeva, G.A., and N. Gombodorzhiyn. 2019. “Language Policy in Mongolia: Problem of Revival of the Old Mongolian Script (the Mongolian Script).” Humanitarian Vector, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 98-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21209/1996-7853-2019-14-3-98-104 EDN: ZTGIAX
  26. Khilkhanova, E.V., Ch. S. Tsybenova, and V.V. Ivanov. 2024. “Urban multilingualism in Russian regions: linguistic landscapes and attitudes towards languages (the cases of Kyzyl and Ulan-Ude).” New Research of Tuva, no. 4, pp. 188-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2024.4.13 EDN: LSIFBB
  27. Kolyagiyn, D. 2021. “Classical Mongolian Script: State Policy Revisited.” Mongolian Studies, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 108-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2021-1-108-119 EDN: HZMVZA
  28. Heller, M., A. Jaworski, and C. Thurlow. 2014. “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and tourism - Mobilities, markets, multilingualism.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 425-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12091
  29. Gerelmaa, G., and B. Bayartyua. 2020. “Sociolinguistic Research of National Mongolian Script Skills.” Bulletin of BSU. Language. Literature. Culture, no. 3, pp. 99-107.
  30. Pietikäinen, S. 2010. “Sámi language mobility: Scales and discourses of multilingualism in a polycentric environment.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, no. 202, pp. 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2010.015
  31. Duchêne, A., and M. Heller. 2012. Language in late capitalism. Pride and profit. Routledge. Print.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Khilkhanova E.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.