Morpheme-Grammar Dictionary of Russian Verbs as a Means of Forming Intuitive Knowledge of the Language

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study describes the principles of designing a morpheme-grammar dictionary of Russian verbs within the framework of systemic linguistics. As a working hypothesis for the creation of the dictionary the concept of G.P. Mel’nikov was chosen according to which the Russian verb, in addition to the binary category of aspect, also has a gradual “quantitative” category, which he proposed to name the category of action degree (CAD). The formal indicators of the grammatical meaning of the CAD are the suffixes -ну-, -Ø-, -e-, -и-, -ыва- . G.P. Mel’nikov believed that taking into account the CAD and highlighting a single stem in the verb paradigm after restoring the actual morphemic composition of each verb form would explain many irregularities in verb inflection and derivation. The analysis of the functioning of the CAD in modern Russian has shown that it has a great applied significance. Suffixes of CAD turned out to be a convenient criterion for dividing Russian verbs into morphological classes, which in turn have made it possible to present Russian verbs in an orderly manner in a lexicographic description. The article reveals the principles of morphemic analysis for identification of root and suffix allomorphs, provides a brief overview of morphological classes of verbs, and explains the structure of the dictionary entry which is a matrix. Matrix notation allows us to compactly represent all suffix and prefix forms of the verb in a systematic way, makes it possible to graphically show grammatical and morphological information as well as etymological and word-formation relationships within the verb system. Morphemic matrices have a high explanatory potential because they offer rich material for studying the mechanisms of word formation and observing the peculiarities of morpheme combinations. Morphemic matrices significantly expand the potential vocabulary, contribute to the development of a feeling for language, and facilitate the acquisition of morpheme-semantic intuition.

About the authors

Tatiana L. Liakhnovitch

Belarusian State Orders of the October Revolution and the Red Banner of Labour Agricultural Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: vvktll@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-0702-3131

Associate Professor, Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor of the Department of Linguistic Disciplines

5 Michurina St, Gorki, Mogilev region, 213410, Republic of Belarus

Tatiana V. Vashchekina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: vascjulia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-7193-4437
SPIN-code: 6735-6570

Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor of the Department of Comparative Language Studies, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Area Studies

1 Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

References

  1. Bogomazov, G.M. 2007. Correlation of the concepts of flair of language, sense of language, language competence, language ability. Questions of psycholinguistics, no. 6, pp. 33–39. Print. (In Russ.)
  2. Chibuhashvili, V.А. 2009. Functional features of linguistic intuition and conditions of its use in the speech development of a student. Bulletin of TSU. Issue 4 (72), pp. 63–69.
  3. Liakhnovitch T.L. 2013. Explanation of the variation of the morphemic structure of verbs from the standpoint of systemic linguistics. Language Systemology: On the 85th anniversary of Professor Gennady Prokopyevich Melnikov: collection of articles. Materials of the International Scientific Conference. Moscow, RUDN, February 21, 2013. Moscow: RUDN, pp. 147–155.
  4. Liakhnovitch, T.L. 2014. Sound symbolism as a means of expressing grammatical meaning in the Russian verb system. Topical issues of philology and methods of teaching foreign languages. Articles and materials of the Sixth International Scientific Conference “Topical issues of philology and methods of teaching foreign languages” (St. Petersburg, February 19– 21, 2014). St. Petersburg, pp. 80–88.
  5. Mel’nikov, G.P. 1974. On the methodology of identifying and explaining the irregularity of Russian verb formation. Inter-university. conf. “Optimal methods of teaching the language and theory of the Russian language” Thesis. dokl. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of the trade union movement, pp. 12–16.
  6. Mel’nikov, G.P. 1987. Morphemic composition of infinitives and personal forms of the Russian verb. Comparative and descriptive linguistics. Moscow: Publishing House of UDN, pp. 97–109.
  7. Jakobson, R. 1985. Russian conjugation. Selected works. Moscow: Progress, pp. 198–209.
  8. Morkovkin, V.V. 1990. Some statements from the field of the theory of educational lexico- graphy. Russian language and literature in communication of the peoples of the world: problems of functioning and teaching. Reports of the Soviet delegation to the VII International Conference. Congress of teachers of Russian language and Literature. Moscow: Rus. Yazyk, pp. 182–192.

Copyright (c) 2024 Liakhnovitch T.L., Vashchekina T.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies