Transgression of the romantic movement in Western society: The unity of Romanticism and Modernism
- Authors: Kapishin A.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 906-927
- Section: Theory, Methodology and History of Sociological Research
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/42228
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-4-906-927
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QIDDTQ
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article is the first and the most general part of the study and focuses on the thesis that has been put forward before but is not entirely clear and widespread in the Russian science: in Western cultures and societies in the 19th-20th centuries, a single “romantic movement” developed and unfolded in several stages. This romantic trend is considered not from the perspective of art history but in a broader sense - as a trend that determines the culture of Western society. Romanticism (“high romanticism”) is the first representative of this movement; all its “generic features” are manifested in it, considered as principles not only of art but also of a worldview - unfolding in philosophy and determining the parameters of culture. “High Romanticism” is followed by Modernism, in which decadence (“late Romanticism”, Modernism of the late 19th century) is distinguished from Modernism of the 20th century, often called avant-garde in the broader sense (not only a movement in painting and art but also a new worldview). Romanticism, decadence and the avant-garde are not simply social-cultural phenomena that follow one another in time, are different in some ways and similar in others, but also are stages in the development of a single system of principles of spiritual culture (according to T. Mann, stages of a single “intellectual movement”). The study is also based on the idea that Romanticism is an antagonist of the movement that does not have a single name but has a quite clear meaning: sometimes, using the terminology of art to define the entire “intellectual movement”, it is called “realistic”, or, using the terminology of science, it is called “positivist” (and associated with the “principles of the Enlightenment”). Two “directions of thought” make up a pair, their struggle determines social-cultural dynamics; therefore, we can speak of their dualism. Thus, F. Nietzsche asserted the dualism of the Apollonian and Dionysian principles, although without reducing the Apollonian principle to the “Enlightenment” that limited the capabilities of the intellect. The common issue of all articles in the study is the transgression of the romantic trend in Western society from the 19th to the first half of the 20th century. The term “transgression” can be replaced by “advance” or “spread”, since the author’s idea is that the romantic movement not only coexisted with the realistic one, changing one’s forms, but gradually and irreversibly displaced it in Western societies to eventually become the dominant of their culture. In the early 19th century, during the time of “high romanticism,” the cultural dominant of Western society was the “Enlightenment” trend expressed in classicist art and positivist science; by the end of the era of “high romanticism”, in the mid-20th century, the dominant changed and led to the development of postmodernism which also belongs to the romantic movement.
About the authors
A. E. Kapishin
RUDN University
Author for correspondence.
Email: kapishin-ae@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia
References
- Andreev L.G Zapadnoevropeyskaya literatura, XX vek [Western European literature, XX century]. Voprosy Literatury. 1983; 8. (In Russ.).
- Andreev L.G. Impressionism = Impressionnisme: Videt. Chuvstvovat. Vyrazhat [Impressionism = Impressionnisme: To See. To Feel. To Express]. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
- Arkan Yu.L., Naumova E.I. Romantizm vs Prosveshchenie? [Romanticism vs. Enlightenment?]. Vestnik SPbGU. Filosofiya i Konfliktologiya. 2013; 2. (In Russ.).
- Basinsky P. Imenno Baudelaire byl rodonachalnikom “moderna” v poezii [It was Baudelaire who was the founder of “modernism” in poetry]. Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 2021; 7. (In Russ.).
- Weingartner M. Kolledzh sotsiologii i instituta sotsialnyh issledovaniy: Benjamin i Bataille [College of Sociology and Institute of Social Research: Benjamin and Bataille]. NLO. 2004; 4. (In Russ).
- Kondrakhina G.K. Traditsii primitivizma v graficheskom modernizme [Traditions of primitivism in graphic Modernism]. Vestnik PGU. Rossiyskaya i Zarubezhnaya Filologiya. 2009; 2. (In Russ.).
- Krivykh E.U. Metafizika voli v irratsionalisticheskih kontseptsiyah A. Schopenhauera, R. Wagnera, F. Nietzsche [Metaphysics of will in irrationalist concepts of A. Schopenhauer, R. Wagner, F. Nietzsche]. Vestnik ChelGU. 2009; 33. (In Russ.).
- Lifshits M.A., Reingardt L.Ya. Krizis bezobraziya: ot kubizma k pop-artu [Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop Art]. Moscow; 1968. (In Russ.).
- Mann T. Khudozhnik i obshchestvo. Statyi i pisma [Artist and Society. Articles and Letters]. Moscow; 1985. (In Russ.).
- Mikhaylovsky N.K. Literaturnye vospominaniya i sovremennaya smuta [Literary Memories and Contemporary Turmoil]. Vol. II. Saint Petersburg; 1900. (In Russ.).
- Nalivayko D.S Iskusstvo: napravleniya, napravleniya, stili [Art: Trends, Trends, and Styles]. Kyiv; 1985. (In Russ.).
- Nietzsche F. Rozhdenie tragedii [The Birth of Tragedy]. Moscow; 2001.
- Nordau M. Vyrozhdenie. Sovremennye frantsuzy [Degeneration]. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
- Paglia C. Lichiny seksualnosti [Sexual Personae]. Yekaterinburg; 2006. (In Russ.).
- Plekhanov G.V. Evangelie ot dekadansa [Gospel of decadence]. Plekhanov G.V. Literatura i estetika: in 2 vols. Moscow; 1958. Vol. 2.
- Pokidchenko I.M. Fenomen desyatiletiya v sfere kultury vtoroy poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka [The Phenomenon of the Decade in the Cultural Sphere of the Second Half of the 20th — Early 20th Century]: Diss. k. kulturologii. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
- Saveliev K.N. Literatura angliyskogo dekadansa: istoki, stanovlenie, samorefleksiya [Literature of English Decadence: Origins, Formation, Self-Reflection]: Diss. d.f.n. Moscow; 2008. (In Russ.).
- Tolstoy L.N. Chto takoe iskusstvo? [What Is Art]. Moscow; 1951. (In Russ.).
- Khorolsky V.V. Osnovnye napravleniya v angliyskoy i irlandskoy poezii rubezha XIX–XX vekov (problemy istoriko-tipologicheskoy differentsiatsii i khudozhestvennoy revolyutsii) [Main Directions in English and Irish Poetry in the 19th–20th Centuries (Issues of Historical-Typological Diversity and Artistic Revolution)]: Diss. d.f.n. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
- Yakimovich A.K. Rozhdenie avangarda. Iskusstvo i mysl [The Birth of the Avant-Garde. Art and Thought]: Diss. d. iskusstvovedeniya. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.).
- Entsiklopediya simvolizma: zhivopis, grafika, skulptura. Literatura. Muzyka [Encyclopedia of Symbolism: Painting, Graphics, Sculpture. Literature. Music]. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.).