Features of the perception and construction of sacred images by the generation Z (on the example of the technical university in the Republic of Bashkortostan)

Abstract

The actualization of the issues of the youth’s religiosity and of its scientific interpretation on the example of students, representatives of generation Z (centennials, Gen Z), determined the research questions of the article which aims at identifying centennials’ estimates of various religious phenomena and their interpretation of knowledge about it. The theoretical basis of the article are the ideas of social constructionism, which help to understand how young people take part in the creation of such a social construct as religion. The article summarizes the results of the sociological study of ideas about religion among students of the large regional university - Ufa State Petroleum Technical University (Republic of Bashkortostan). The sample consisted of students born after 1995, aged 18 to 26 (N = 1900); the author used the questionnaire with closed questions, narrative interviews and focus groups with the Eastern Regional Studies’ students. Based on the results of the survey, the author considers the youth’s ideas about religion, religious traditions and practices, their spread in the regional community, and the origins of religious sentiments and attitudes reproduced and constructed by the youth. The author notes the lack of unity in various aspects of the youth’s attitude towards religion, which indicates the blurring and eclecticism of religious ideas among the generation Z. Although students declare a wide variety of manifestations of religiosity, the relationship between religion and the existential understanding of the world is clear. Images of the sacred go beyond students’ religious worldview, which is due to the way knowledge about reality is constructed and to the individual need to sacralize knowledge. The comparative analysis of the construction of the image of the sacred by Muslim and Orthodox centennials showed some differences: Muslims are more religious; religious tradition seems to be transmitted from generation to generation mainly by the Muslim part of the Gen Z, and, on the contrary, is constructed by Orthodox students in the current social context. However, there is a general trend - religious identity of the believer is not strictly based on a certain tradition but is constructed with available knowledge and changes with new information, which is a typical feature of the generation Z.

About the authors

I. I. Enikeeva

Ufa State Petroleum Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: zekrist@mail.ru
Chernyshevsky St., 145, Ufa, 450078, Russia

References

  1. Batyrshina E.N. Sootnoshenie ateisticheskogo i religioznogo mirovozzreniya u grupp studencheskoj molodyozhi (na primere Respubliki Bashkortostan) [Correlation of atheistic and religious outlook among the student youth (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan)]. Sotsiodynamica. 2017; 12. (In Russ.).
  2. Berger P., Luckmann T. Sotsialnoe konstruirovanie real`osti. Traktat po sotsologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
  3. Bulanova M.B., Artamonova E.A. NEET-molodezh: potrebitelskoe povedenie v novoj realnosti [NEET-youth: Consumer behavior in the new reality]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2022; 22 (1). (In Russ.).
  4. Ivleva M.L., Kurilov S.N., Rossman V.I. Religioznye tsennosti glazami molodezhi: opyt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [The youth’s perception of religious values: A sociological study]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (3). (In Russ.).
  5. Merton R., Fiske M., Kendall P. Fokusirovannoe interviyu [The Focused Interview]. Moscow; 1991. (In Russ.).
  6. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Tsennostnye orientatsii i socialnoe samochuvstvie studenchestva (rezultaty issledovatelskogo proekta) [Value Orientations and Social Well-Being of the Student Youth (Results of the Empirical Study)]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  7. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnoe samochuvstvie molodezhi postsotsialisticheskih stran (na primere Rossii, Kazakhstana i Chekhii): sravnitelny analiz strakhov, nadezhd i opaseniy (Сhast 2) [The social well-being of the post-socialist countries’ youth (on the example of Russia, Kazakhstan and Czech Republic): Comparative analysis of fears and hopes (Part 2)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (2). (In Russ.).
  8. Papayani I.V. Construction of the contemporary believer’s image in Bruno Dumont’s film “Hedwigh”. URL: https:// elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/85504/1/78-81. pdf?ysclid=lj1sxee16i563774569. (In Russ.).
  9. Rutkevich, E.D. Molodye pokoleniya i (ne) religiya [Young generations and (non) religion]. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina. 2023; 1. (In Russ.).
  10. Savchenko I.A. Kulturnaya integratsiya inostrannogo studenta v rossijskuyu sotsialnuyu dejstvitelnost: opyt issledovaniya [Cultural integration of the foreign student into the Russian social reality: A study]. Vestnik NGU im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Sotsialnye Nauki. 2019; 4. (In Russ.).
  11. Savchenko I.A. Etnicheskie stereotipy v studencheskom soobshchestve [Ethnic stereotypes in the student community]. V Mire Nauchnyh Otkrytiy. 2021; 3.1. (In Russ.).
  12. Smirnov M.Yu. Sotsiologiya religii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dva nablyudeniya [Sociology of religion in the Russian Federation: Two observations]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. Religiovedenie. 2014; 3. (In Russ.).
  13. Tarasova E.O. Semejnye tsennosti v mirovyh religioznyh konfessiyah i ih vliyanie na rossijskuyu semiyu [Family values in world religious denominations and their impact on the Russian family]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2016; 16 (2). (In Russ.).
  14. Turner B. Religiya v postsekulyarnom obshhestve [Religion in the post-secular society]. Gosudarstvo. Religiya. Tserkov. 2012; 2. (In Russ.).
  15. Trotsuk I.V., Tsimbal M.V. O polze mifologem dlya sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya [On the benefits of mythologies for sociological imagination]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2023; 23 (3).
  16. Ustinkin S.V., Vagapov R.N., Vagapova F.G. Potentsial organizatsij musulmanskogo dukhovenstva v razvitii sotsialno-politicheskih protsessov v Rossii [Organizational Potential of the Muslim Clergy in the Development of Social-Political Processes in Russia]. Nizhny Novgorod; 2014. (In Russ.).
  17. Fedorova M.V. Dinamika religioznyh orientatsij rossijskoj molodezhi v usloviyah sovremennogo obshchestva [Dynamics of the Russian youth’s religious orientations in the contemporary society]. Istoricheskie, Filosofskie, Politicheskie i Yuridicheskie Nauki, Kulturologiya i Iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki. 2015; 11. (In Russ.).
  18. Shirokalova G.S., Shimanskaya O.K., Anikina A.V. Sushchestvuyut li gendernye osobennosti religioznosti studencheskoj molodezhi? [Is there gender specifics in the religiosity of the student youth?]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 16. (In Russ.).
  19. Banerjee K., Bloom P. Why did this happen to me? Religious believers’ and non-believers’ teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition. 2014; 133 (1).
  20. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor; 1966.
  21. Bresler M., Galiullina S., Gerasimova D. Transformation of the values of Generation Z — residents of the digital society of sustainable development. E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 208. Yekaterinburg; 2020.
  22. Green J.M., Phillips L.M. Social threat perception and the evolution of paranoia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2004; 28 (3).
  23. Denton M.L., Pearce L.D., Smith C. Religion and spirituality on the path through adolescence. Research Report. 2008; 8.
  24. Evans E.M. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology. 2001; 42 (3).
  25. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives. Ammerman N. (Ed.). Oxford University Press; 2007.
  26. Collins-Mayo S. Youth and religion: An international perspective. Theo-Web. Zeitschrift für Religionspädagogik. 2012; 1.
  27. Pope B., Price J., Lillard D.R. The impact of religion on youth outcomes. Journal of Business Inquiry. 2014; 13.
  28. Kelemen D. British and American children’s preferences for teleo-functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition. 2003; 88 (2).
  29. Lindsey L.L. Gender Roles: A Sociological Perspective. New York; 2015.
  30. Lippman L.H., McIntosh H. The demographics of spirituality and religiosity among youth: International and U.S. patterns. URL: http://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/01/ Spirituality-and-Religi-osity-Among-Youth.pdf
  31. Filimonau V., Kubal-Czerwińska M., Mika M., Zajadacz A. Religious values and family upbringing as antecedents of food waste avoidance. Global Environmental Change. 2022; 75 (6).
  32. Trotsuk I. Eschatological conspiracy theories: Models and ways for identifying apocalyptic semantics and syntax. Russian Sociological Review. 2023; 22 (4).
  33. Vries de E., Toshkov D.D., van der Pol, L., Groeneveld M. Fathers, faith, and family gender messages: Are religiosity and gender talk related to children’s gender attitudes and preferences? Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2022; 21.

Copyright (c) 2024 Enikeeva I.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies