‘Core’ and ‘periphery’ of the concepts ‘happiness’ and ‘justice’: Unfinished sentences technique as a means of validation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article continues a series of publications based on the results of a long-term research project of the Sociology Chair of the RUDN University, which combines research and methodological study of the self-identification of Russian students in terms of happiness. At the current stage, two new ‘dimensions’ were added to the project: first, the contextualization of questions about happiness by the concept and elements of social justice (as its ‘external determinant’); second, ‘measuring’ the images of a happy/unhappy person with the projective technique (unfinished sentences) and taking into account social ideas about justice/injustice. Being limited by the size of the article, the authors focus on the second ‘dimension’ - identify the possibilities and limitations of the unfinished-sentences technique as a means for validating the results of the project rather than a means for starting it. The structure of the article contributes to the solution of this task: in the first, introductory part, the author set the research problem as determined by the self-diagnostic mania of the contemporary society (in terms of the level of happiness) and the attempts to classify the factors of happiness; the second part presents the main stages of the project and its conclusions based on the results of the surveys (on the sample of the RUDN University students and on the all-Russian representative online panel); the third, main part presents the results of the unfinished-sentences technique application, which were obtained with the simplest content-analytical coding of the elementary endings. The authors reconstructed a single-type structure of images of a happy/unhappy person (in the context of factors determining such ‘statuses’) and of justice/injustice (taking into account their characteristics) - the core, the near periphery and the far periphery, which differ in their semantic ‘volumes’ and evaluation trends.

About the authors

I. V. Trotsuk

RUDN University; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; National Research University Higher School of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: irina.trotsuk@yandex.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia; Vernadskogo Prosp., 84, Moscow, 119571, Russia; Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, 101000, Russia

M. V. Subbotina

RUDN University

Email: subbotina-mv@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Argyle M. Psikhologiya schastya [The Psychology of Happiness]. Saint Petersburg; 2003. (In Russ.).
  2. Aristotel. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean ethics]. Sochineniya. Vol. 4. Moscow; 1983. (In Russ.).
  3. Baranova T.S. Psikhosemanticheskie metody v sotsiologii [Psychosemantic methods in sociology]. Sotsiologiya: 4M. 1993–1994; 3–4. (In Russ.).
  4. Klimov I.A. Kompleksnoe ispolzovanie semanticheskogo differentsiala i kontent-analiza otkrytyh voprosov dlya izucheniya kulturnyh fenomenov [The combination of semantic differential and content analysis of open questions for the study of cultural phenomena]. Sotsiologiya: 4M. 1998; 10. (In Russ.).
  5. Klimova S.G. Opyt ispolzovaniya metodiki neokonchennyh predlozheniy v sotsiologicheskom issledovanii [The use of the unfinished sentences technique in sociological research]. Sotsiologiya: 4M. 1995; 5–6. (In Russ.).
  6. Klyushkina O.B. Postroenie teorii na osnove kachestvennyh dannyh [Making a theory on the basis of qualitative data]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2000; 10. (In Russ.).
  7. Lapygin V.D. Metodologicheskie i metodicheskie perspektivy razvitiya metoda neokonchennyh predlozheniy [Methodological perspectives for the development of the unfinished sentences technique]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  8. Namlinskaya O.O. “Ekonomika schastiya”: osobennosti opredeleniya i perspektivy razvitiya v usloviyah modernizatsii [“Economy of happiness”: Definition and prospects for development under modernization]. Regionalnye Problemy Preobrazovaniy Ekonomiki. 2014; 4. (In Russ.).
  9. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Schastie i ego determinanty v predstavlenii rossiyan: rezultaty oprosa [Russians’ interpretation of happiness and its determinants: Results of the survey]. Zhurnal Belorusskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Sotsiologiya. 2021; 4. (In Russ.).
  10. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Schastie kak mezhdistsiplinarny konstrukt: varianty sotsiologicheskoy kontseptualizatsii i operatsionalizatsii [Happiness as an interdisciplinary construct: Types of sociological conceptualization and operationalization]. Vestnik RFFI. Gumanitarnye i Obshchestvennye Nauki. 2021; 2. (In Russ.).
  11. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Tsennostnye orientatsii i sotsialnoe samochuvstvie studenchestva (rezultaty issledovatelskogo proekta) [Value Orientations and Social Well-Being of Students (Results of the Research Project)]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  12. Oberemko O.A. Na kakie voprosy otvechayut otvety na otkryty vopros: opyt re-konstruktsii transformatsiy voprosa respondentami [What questions the answers to the open question answer: A reconstruction of the question transformation by respondents]. Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2013; 37. (In Russ.).
  13. Saganenko G.I. Metod otkrytyh voprosov [Open questions method]. Sotsiologichesky Zhurnal. 1998; 3/4. (In Russ.).
  14. Saganenko G.I. Sistemy, formaty i poznavatelny potentsial otkrytyh voprosov [Systems, formats and cognitive potential of open questions]. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoy Antropologii. 2001; IV (4). (In Russ.).
  15. Seligman M.E.P. Novaya pozitivnaya psikhologiya: Nauchny vzglyad na schastie i smysl zhizni [The New Positive Psychology: A Scientific Perspective on Happiness and the Meaning of Life]. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.).
  16. Strauss A., Corbin J. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques]. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
  17. Tarshis E.Ya. Kontent-analiz: printsipy metodologii (Postroenie teoreticheskoy bazy. Ontologiya, analitika i fenomenologiya teksta. Programmy issledovaniya) [Content Analysis: Principles of Methodology (Theoretical Basis. Ontology, Analysis and Phenomenology of Text. Research Programs)]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).
  18. Tatarkevich V. O schastie i sovershenstve cheloveka [On Human Happiness and Perfection]. Moscow; 1981. (In Russ.).
  19. Tatarova G.G., Burlov A.V. Logicheskaya organizatsiya analiza dannyh, poluchennyh metodom neokonchennyh predlozheniy [Logical organization of the analysis of data obtained by the unfinished sentences technique]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 1999; 8. (In Russ.).
  20. Tatarova G.G., Burlov A.V. Metod neokonchennyh predlozheniy v izuchenii obraza (“kulturny chelovek”) [The unfinished sentences technique in the study of the image (“cultured man”)]. Sotsiologiya: 4M. 1997; 9. (In Russ.).
  21. Trotsuk I.V. Metodicheskie i soderzhatelnye osobennosti sotsiologicheskogo izucheniya fenomena schastiya oprosnymi metodami [Methodological and conceptual issues of the sociological study of the phenomenon of happiness by survey techniques]. Sotsialnaya Politika i Sotsiologiya. 2019; 18 (1). (In Russ.).
  22. Trotsuk I.V. Traktovki schastiya i spravedlivosti — osnova pokolencheskoy solidarnosti ili konflikta? [Interpretations of happiness and justice — the basis for generational solidarity or conflict?]. Mezhkulturny i mezhreligiozny dialog v rossiyskih regionah. Tyumen; 2022. (In Russ.).
  23. Trotsuk I.V., Grebneva V.E. Vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya osnovnykh metodicheskikh podkhodov k izucheniyu schastiya [Possibilities and limitations of the key methodological approaches to the study of happiness]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 18: Sotsiologiya i Politologiya. 2019; 25 (3). (In Russ.).
  24. Trotsuk I.V., Koroleva K.I. Neochevidnye ogranicheniya sotsiologicheskoy otsenki blagopoluchiya: rezultaty metodicheskogo eksperimenta [Nonobvious limitations of the sociological study of well-being: Results of the methodological experiment]. Sotsialnaya Politika i Sotsiologiya. 2020; 19 (1). (In Russ.).
  25. Shmatova Yu.E., Morev M.V. Izmerenie urovnya schastya: literaturny obzor rossiyskikh i zarubezhnykh issledovany [Measuring the level of happiness: A review of Russian and foreign studies]. Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny: Fakty, Tendentsii, Prognoz. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  26. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks; 2006.
  27. Duncan G. What do we mean by «happiness»? The relevance of subjective well-being to social policy. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2005; 25.
  28. Easterlin R. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal. 2001; III.
  29. Easterlin R. Will raising the income of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1995; 27.
  30. Ferrer‐i‐Carbonell A., Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal. 2004; 114.
  31. Kahneman D., Krueger A.B. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2006; 20 (1).
  32. Miller S.I. How does grounded theory explain? Qualitative Health Research. 1999; 9 (4).
  33. Montgomery A.C., Crittenden K.S. Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1977; 41 (2).
  34. Trotsuk I.V. Complex concepts with varying connotations: In search for conceptual definitions. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2021; 21 (2).
  35. Trotsuk I.V. Three approaches to the sociological study of the social well-being. Serbian Sociological Review. 2019; LIII (1).
  36. Trotsuk I.V. What do sociologists really “measure” when speaking of happiness? Sociology in XXI Century: Challenges and Perspectives. Belgrade-Niš; 2019.
  37. Veenhoven R. Hedonism and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2003; 4.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Trotsuk I.V., Subbotina M.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies