Socially significant information and issues of the Kazakhstanis’ trust in the media

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article presents the results of the sociological survey of the Kazakhstan society on the issues of the information society and mass communication, which was a part of the programtargeted-funded project of the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Development of information technologies and systems for the sustainable personal development as a foundation for the development of digital Kazakhstan”. The study aimed at identifying preferences of various social categories in the choice of news and socially significant topics in the media space, and at assessing the influence of news of different thematic focus on the personal sustainable development (psychological/emotional, social and intellectual stability). The comprehensive analysis of the media as a channel of social influence has become more urgent under the pandemic, which is reflected in the wide use of the term ‘infodemic’ to assess information processes since the first half of 2020. The article considers the information agenda when choosing and assessing the importance of news content in the Kazakhstan media. Based on the postulate about significant differences in the information agenda of different social groups, the authors focus on the main factors of trust in information channels. The empirical data showed a correlation between the social significance of news information and the level of social trust in media. The study is based on the theoretical model combining two complementary factors: on the one hand, the influence of the media as possessing if not a monopoly (P. Bourdieu) then significant preferences in affecting public opinion and value orientations of various groups; on the other hand, the media dependence as determined by supply and demand. Based on various theories of the information agenda setting, the authors confirmed the need to take into account the social-demographic characteristics when forming the media content - when it is necessary to convey some specific information to different social groups.

About the authors

A. B. Shabdenova

Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Email: aija2005@mail.ru

PhD по социологии, старший преподаватель кафедры социологии и социальной работы

Prosp. Al-Farabi, 71, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan

G. T. Alimbekova

Center for the Study of Public Opinion

Email: welcome@ciom.kz

кандидат социологических наук, директор

Zhibek Zholy St., 54, Almaty, 050002, Kazakhstan

S. A. Lifanov

Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lifanov.sergey.a@gmail.com

докторант кафедры философии

Prosp. Al-Farabi, 71, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan

References

  1. Bourdieu P. O televidenii i zhurnalistike [On Television and Journalism]. Мoscow; 2002. (In Russ.).
  2. McLuhan H.M. Ponimanie media. Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Мoscow; 2007. (In Russ.).
  3. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnoe samochuvstvie molodezhi postsotsialisticheskih stran (na primere Rossii, Kazakhstana i Chekhii): sravnitelny analiz tsennostnyh oriyentatsiy (Chast 2) [The social well-being of the post-socialist countries’ youth (on the example of Russia, Kazakhstan and Czech Republic): Comparative analysis of fears and hopes (Part 2)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (2). (In Russ.).
  4. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnoe samochuvstvie molodezhi postsotsialisticheskih stran (na primere Rossii, Kazakhstana i Chekhii): sravnitelny analiz tsennostnyh oriyentatsiy (Chast 1) [The social well-being of the post-socialist countries’ youth (on the example of Russia, Kazakhstan and Czech Republic): Comparative analysis of value orientations (Part 1)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (1). (In Russ.).
  5. Ospanova U.A., Baimakhanbetov M.A., Shakenova M. T. Ustanovlenie vliyaniya novostnoj informatsii na otdelnye komponenty ustojchivogo razvitiya lichnosti [Identifying the impact of news information on the selected components of the individual sustainable development]. Bulletin of the Abai KNPU. Series: Philological Sciences. 2020; 4. (In Russ.).
  6. Anderson C.A., Bushman B.J. Media violence and societal violence. Science. 2002; 295.
  7. Akhmetova L., Verevkin A., Lifanova T. et al. Factors and trends of increasing role of mass media in democratic elections in Kazakhstan. Media Watch. 2020; 11 (2).
  8. Griffin R.J., Yang Z., Ter Huurne E., Boerner F., Ortiz S., Dunwoody S. After the flood: Anger, attribution, and the seeking of information. Science Communication. 2008; 29 (3).
  9. Han C., Yang M., Piterou A. Do news media and citizens have the same agenda on covid-19? An empirical comparison of twitter posts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; 169.
  10. Lee J., Kim K., Park G., Cha N. The role of online news and social media in preventive action in times of infodemic from a social capital perspective: The case of the covid-19 pandemic in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics. 2021; 64 (11).
  11. Levendusky M., Malhotra N. Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication. 2016; 33 (2).
  12. Li R., Suh A. Factors influencing information credibility on social media platforms: Evidence from Facebook pages. Procedia Computer Science. 2015; 72.
  13. Lin X., Spence P.R., Lachlan K.A. Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016; 63 (10).
  14. Marin L. Three contextual dimensions of information on social media: Lessons learned from the covid-19 infodemic. Ethics and Information Technology. 2020; 1-8.
  15. McCombs M., Shaw D. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972; 2.
  16. Pinto S., Albanese F., Dorso C.O., Balenzuela P. Quantifying time-dependent media agenda and public opinion by topic modeling. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 2019; 524 (6).
  17. Schillinger D., Chittamuru D., Ramirez A.S. From ‘infodemics’ to health promotion: A novel framework for the role of social media in public health. American Journal of Public Health. 2020; 110 (9).
  18. Slater M.D. Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory. 2007; 17 (3).
  19. Su Y. It doesn’t take a village to fall for misinformation: Social media use, discussion heterogeneity preference, worry of the virus, faith in scientists, and covid-19-related misinformation beliefs. Telematics and Informatics. 2021; 58.
  20. Vu H.T, Guo L, McCombs M.E. Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads”: A network agenda-setting. Study Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2014; 91.
  21. Wang C.-J., Zhu J.H. Jumping onto the bandwagon of collective gatekeepers: Testing the bandwagon effect of information diffusion on social news website. Telematics and Informatics. 2019; 41.
  22. Wanta W., Golan G., Lee Ch. Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2004; 2.
  23. Chang S.P., Kaye B.K. What’s this? Incidental exposure to news on social media, news-findsme perception, news efficacy, and news consumption. Mass Communication and Society. 2020; 23 (2).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Shabdenova A.B., Alimbekova G.T., Lifanov S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies