Social representations of covid-19 in the unstable information environment (a mid-2021 study)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of studying the social consequences of the covid-19 is determined by the fact that this transforming event affected the most diverse aspects of life in the Russian society. The article presents the results of the survey conducted on the sample of the Moscow residents in mid-2021. The majority of respondents considered the coronavirus as a dangerous disease that should be taken seriously. The phenomenon of coronavirus, due to its complexity, poor knowledge and mass distribution, has acquired not only a biomedical, but also a political, economic and media dimension. The information field about the origin, sources and measures to combat this disease experienced changes over time and was often contradictory. A typological analysis showed that there are several groups with different social ideas about the origin, control measures and social consequences of the covid-19. A significant group - about a half of respondents - shared ideas that were alternative to the official and dominant interpretation of the coronavirus in the information field. The study revealed that the agreement on the dangers of the coronavirus was combined with the priority of personal choice of means to combat it. The majority of respondents (61 %) were against the introduction of mandatory vaccination: among the most popular motives were doubts about its effectiveness and fears of its side effects; the priority of individual choice and the rights of citizens rather than the state. A statistically significant relationship was found between attitudes towards mandatory vaccination and trust in government: a low level of agreement with mandatory vaccination obviously correlates with a low level of trust in leading social-political institutions. The authors show that the Russian media discourse on the need for mass vaccination was accompanied by a wide spread of ideas that rigidly differentiate Russian citizens, which cannot but cause concerns about the tasks of ensuring social stability and unity of the Russian society.

About the authors

M. M. Nazarov

Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS

Email: vy175867@yandex.ru

доктор политических наук, главный научный сотрудник

V. N. Ivanov

Institute of Socio-Political Research of FCTAS RAS; RUDN University

Email: vilen_ivanov@bk.ru

доктор философских наук, член-корреспондент и советник Российской академии наук; главный научный сотрудник Института социально-политических исследований Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук; профессор кафедры социологии Российского университета дружбы народов

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

E. A. Kublitskaya

Institute for Demographic Research of FCTAS RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: eakubl@yandex.ru

кандидат философских наук, ведущий научный сотрудник

Fotieva St., 6-1, 119333, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Artamonov R.E., Lavrentiev N.V. Obshhestvennoe mnenie v techenie goda pandemii: otsenki sobytij i tendentsij. “Cherny lebed” v beloj maske. Аnalitichesky doklad NIU VShE k godovshchine pandemii covid-19 [Public opinion during a year of the pandemic: Assessments of events and trends. “Black Swan” in a White Mask. HSE Analytical Report on the Anniversary of the covid-19 pandemic]. Ed. by S.M. Plaksina, A.B. Zhulina, SA. Farizova. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).
  2. Bunt nevezhd. Yuliya Latynina rasskazyvaet istoriyu vaktsinatsii i borby s nej [The revolt of the ignorant. Yulia Latynina tells the story of vaccination and the fight against it]. URL: https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2021/08/07/bunt-nevezhd. (In Russ.).
  3. Voevodina T. Privivatsya ne khotyat [They don’t want to be vaccinated]. URL: https://zavtra. ru/blogs/privivat_sya_ne_hotyat. (In Russ.).
  4. Kazun A.D., Kazun A.P. Volnovaya (de)problematizatsiya: osveshchenie pandemii koronavirusa v Rossii na federalnom telekanale [Wave (de)problematization: Coverage of the coronavirus pandemic in Russia on the federal TV channel]. Monitoring Obshhestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2020; 6. (In Russ.).
  5. Kara-Murza S.G. Tsennostny razryv kak politicheskaya problema [The value gap as a political problem]. Sotsialno-Gumanitarnye Znaniya. 2015; 2. (In Russ.).
  6. Kuznetsov G. Restitutsiya vlasti: pandemiya, ekspertokratiya i novaya politicheskaya realnost [Restitution of power: Pandemic, expert democracy and new political reality]. Proshhaj, covid? Ed. by: K. Gaaze, V. Danilova, I. Dudenkovf, D. Kralechkin, P. Safronov. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
  7. Markov Sergey. URL: https://vk.com/wall382620481_25939. (In Russ.).
  8. Mikheev E.A., Nestik T.A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy infodemii i otnoshenie lichnosti k dezinformatsii o covid-19 v sotsialnyh setyah [Psychological mechanisms of infodemia and the individual attitude to disinformation about the covid-19 in social networks]. Sotsialnaya i Ekonomicheskaya Psikhologiya. 2021; 1. (In Russ.).
  9. Pisatel Sergej Lukiyanenko zhivopisal, chto sdelal by s protivnikami vaktsinatsii [The writer Sergey Lukyanenko described what he would do with the opponents of vaccination]. URL: https://newizv.ru/news/society/21-06-2021/pisatel-sergey-lukyanenko-zhivopisal-chto-sdelalby-s-protivnikami-vaktsinatsii. (In Russ.).
  10. Ryabchenko N.A., Malysheva O.P., Miroshnichenko I.V. Diskurs “konstitutsionnye popravki” i “pandemiya koronavirusa” v tsifrovoy politicheskoy povestke dnya v 2020 g.: agitatsiya vs sderzhivanie v ofitsialnyk SMI [The “constitutional amendments” and “coronavirus pandemic” discourse in the digital political agenda in 2020: Agitation vs containment in the official media]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Politologiya. 2021; 2. (In Russ.).
  11. Saveliev M. “Maski brosheny, eto chto-to nerealnoe”: rossiyane vrezali deputatu, nazvavshego ih bezmozglymi baranami [“Masks have been dropped, this is something unreal”: Russians hit a deputy who called them ‘brainless sheep’]. URL: https://sobesednik.ru/ obshchestvo/20210727-maski-broseny-eto-cto-to-nerealnoe. (In Russ.).
  12. Sotsiologiya pandemii. Proekt “KoronaFOM” [Sociology of the pandemic. The “CoronaFOM” project]. Ed. by A.A. Oslon. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).
  13. COVID-19 medical misinformation policy. URL: https://support.google.com/youtube/ answer/9891785?hl=en.
  14. DeFleuer M., Ball-Rokeach S. Theories of Mass Communication. New York; 1989.
  15. Edelman Trust Barometer 2021 Global Report. URL: https://www.edelman.com/trust/2021trust-barometer.
  16. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV): Situation Report — 13. URL: https://www.who. int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3. pdf?sfvrsn=195f4010_6.
  17. Trotsuk I.V. All power to the experts? Contradictions of the information society as both depending on and devaluating expertise. Russian Sociological Review. 2021; 20 (1).
  18. Trotsuk I.V. Excessive faith in certainty and its public proponents in the non-linear uncertain world: Reasons and.. more reasons. Russian Sociological Review. 2021; 20 (4).
  19. Yastrebov O.A. Compulsory vaccination: Public benefit or individual’s right limitation. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2021; 21 (4).

Copyright (c) 2022 Nazarov M.M., Ivanov V.N., Kublitskaya E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.