NEET youth: Consumer behavior in the new reality

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article considers the features of the consumer behavior of the NEET youth. Being a part of the generation Z, this group is known for its refusal to work and study, to look for some forms of employment or training. According to the European statistical data, since 2020, there has been an uneven distribution of NEETs by country, and their average share is 14%. According to the Russian data, in recent years there has been a sharp increase in NEET’s share (28%) due to the instability of the labor and education markets under the coronavirus pandemic. In Europe, the majority of NEETs are non-working (unemployed) youth; in Russia, NEETs are mainly economically inactive youth with an inadequate level or quality of training. Despite some difference in the structure of the European and Russian NEETs, their consumer behavior has common features determined by their belonging to the generation Z, whose lifestyle is based on the delay in growing up and on the development of digital space and new technologies. However, unlike other groups of the youth, NEETs do not reduce alcohol consumption, do not choose a healthy lifestyle and do not have a sense of subjective well-being. The authors identify the main strategies of the NEET consumer behavior, and the most common are basic, demonstrative and symbolic consumption mainly supported by parents, state and charity organizations. Under the pandemic, the NEETs’ attempt to keep habitual life and consumption practices was unsuccessful due to the change in the family and social support. Therefore, the NEET group was forced to leave its ‘social niche’, which allowed it to partially restore its social connections.

About the authors

M. B. Bulanova

Russian State University for Humanities

Author for correspondence.
Email: marina_bulanova@inbox.ru

доктор социологических наук, профессор кафедры теории и истории социологии

Miusskaya Pl., 6, Moscow, Russia, 125993

E. A. Artamonova

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University)

Email: catalina.artamonova@gmail.com

кандидат искусствоведения, старший преподаватель департамента иностранных языков

Institutsky Per., 9, Moskow Region, Dolgoprudny, Russia, 141701

References

  1. Bochaver A.A., Zhilinskaya A.V., Khlomov K.D. Perspektivy sovremennykh podrostkov v kontekste zhiznennoy traektorii [Prospects of today’s teenagers in the context of the life trajectory]. Sovremennaya Zarubezhnaya Psikhologiya. 2016; 5 (2). (In Russ.).
  2. Bulanova M.B., Artamonova E.A. NEET-molodezh: evropeysky kontekst i rossiyskie realii [NEET-youth: European context and Russian realities]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2020; 20 (1). (In Russ.).
  3. Bulanova M.B. NEET-molodezh: novaya spetsificheskaya sotsialnaya obshchnost? [NEET youth: A new specific social community?]. Prekariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa. Pod red. Zh.T. Toshchenko. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
  4. Varshavskaya E.Ya. Rossiyskaya NEET-molodezh: kharakteristiki i tipologiya [Russian NEET-youth: Characteristics and typology]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 9. (In Russ.).
  5. Vishnevskaya N.T., Zudina A.A. Ekonomicheski uyazvimye gruppy molodezhi v stranakh OESR i Rossii [Economically vulnerable youth groups in the OECD and Russia]. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya. 2018; 62 (11). (In Russ.).
  6. Demidenko S.Yu. Raznye puti v NEET: o zhiznennykh vyborakh molodezhi [Different paths in NEET: On the life choices of the youth]. Transformatsiya truda v (de)globaliziruyushchemsya obshchestve. Saint Petersburg; 2021. (In Russ.).
  7. Vliyanie covid-19 na blagotvoritelnost i kommerchesky sektor. Analitichesky doklad [Impact of the covid-19 on the charity and business sector. Analytical report]. Yekaterinburg; 2020. URL: https://gsem.urfu.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/common_files/ news/2021/01/blago_ehkspert.pdf. (In Russ.).
  8. Zudina A.A. “Ne rabotayut i ne uchatsya”: NEET-molodezh na rynke truda v Rossii [“Do Not Work and Do Not Study”: NEET Youth in the Russian Labor Market]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  9. Lopatina E.A. Potrebitelskoe povedenie podrostkov v kontekste sotsializatsii (na materialakh Rostovskoy oblasti) [Consumer Behavior of Teenagers During Socialization (on Materials from the Rostov Region)]. Diss. k.s.n. Rostov-on-Don; 2016. (In Russ.).
  10. Manylov D. Forpost poschital kolichestvo “poteryannoy” molodezhi v Rossii [Forpost counted the number of the ‘lost’ youth in Russia]. URL: https://forpost-sz.ru/a/2021-09-06/forpost-poschital-kolichestvo-poteryannoj-molodyozhi-v-rossii. (In Russ.).
  11. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Zhiznennye plany rossiyskoy studencheskoy molodezhi: gendernye i inye razlichiya v otsenkakh sobstvennykh perspektiv na rynke truda [Russian students’ life plans: Gender and other differences in the estimates of prospects in the labor market]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2014; 14 (3). (In Russ.).
  12. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnoe samochuvstvie molodezhi postsotsialisticheskikh stran (na primere Rossii, Kazakhstana i Chekhii): sravnitelny analiz tsennostnykh oriyentatsiy (Chast 1) [The social well-being of the post-socialist countries’ youth (on the example of Russia, Kazakhstan and Czech Republic): Comparative analysis of value orientations (Part 1)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2014; 18 (1). (In Russ.).
  13. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Tsennostnye oriyentatsii i sotsialnoe samochuvstvie studenchestva (rezultaty issledovatelskogo proekta) [Value Orientations and Social Well-Being of Students (Results of the Research Project)]. (In Russ.).
  14. Prutskova E.V. Svyaz religioznosti i tsennostno-normativnykh pokazateley: faktor religioznoy sotsializatsii [Relationship between religiosity and value-normative indicators: The factor of religious socialization]. Vestnik PSTGU. Seriya Bogoslovie. Filosofiya. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  15. Radaev V.V. Millenialy na fone predshestvuyushchikh pokoleniy: empirichesky analiz [Millennials vs previous generations: An empirical analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2018; 3. (In Russ.).
  16. Rodionova L.A. Vozrastnye osobennosti schastlivoy zhizni v Rossii i v Evrope: ekonometrichesky podkhod [Age features of the happy life in Russia and Europe: An econometric approach]. Prikladnaya Ekonometrika. 2015; 4. (In Russ.).
  17. Skvortsov N.G., Bezrukova O.N., Shilkina N.E. Molodezh XXI veka: obraz budushchego [Youth of the XXI century: An image of the future]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2020; 3. (In Russ.).
  18. Skolko “karmannykh” deneg i na chto tratyat podrostki [How much ‘pocket’ money and on what teenagers spend]. 2013. URL: http://chelny-izvest.ru/news/top5/19026-issledovanie-skolko-karmannykh-deneg-i-na-chto-tratyat-podrostki. (In Russ.).
  19. Toshchenko Zh.T. Prekariat. Ot protoklassa k novomu klassu [Precariat. From the Protoclass to a New Class]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
  20. Arnett J.J. Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist. 2000; 55 (5).
  21. Bennett S., Maton K. Kervin L. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2008; 39 (5).
  22. Dikcius V., Urbonavicius S., Pakalniskiene V. Children’s influence on parental purchase decisions: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Market Research. 2019; 36.
  23. Eurostat: Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex, age and labor status. 02.06.2021 (15-29). URL: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do? dataset=lfsi_neet_a&lang=en.
  24. Eurostat: Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex, age and labor status. 02.06.2021 (15-34). URL: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do? dataset=edat_lfse_20&lang=en.
  25. Foxman E., Tansuhaj P., Ekstrom K. Family members’ perceptions of adolescents’ influence in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Research. 1989; March.
  26. Kariková S., Krystoň M., Michalovič V., Neupauer Z., Pavlov I., Vaněk B. Literacy of Adults as a Problem of Inclusion and Equality in Lifelong Learning. How to Work with NEETs. Recommendations for Policy and Practice. Kraków; 2018.
  27. Kerrane B., Hogg M.K. Shared or non-shared? Children’s different consumer socialization experiences within the family environment. European Journal of Marketing. 2013; 47.
  28. Kim C., Yang Z., Lee H. Cultural differences in consumer socialization: A comparison of Chinese-Canadian and Caucasian-Canadian children. Journal of Business Research. 2009; 62.
  29. Kraus L., Eriksson Tinghog M., Lindell A., Pabst A., Piontek D., Room R. Age, period and cohort effects on time trends in alcohol consumption in the Swedish adult population 1979-2011. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2015; 50 (3).
  30. Kurennoy V. Consumption strategies. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-QpB0I_x5E.
  31. Lapierre M.A., Rozeldaal E. Cross-national differences in consumer socialization, development and behavior: A comparison in the United States and the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media. 2018; 14 (12).
  32. Quirmbach D., Gerry C.J. Gender, education, and Russia’s tobacco epidemic: A life-course approach. Social Science and Medicine. 2016; 160.
  33. Ogawa А. Hikikomori in contemporary Japan. URL: http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/ diva2:568035/FULLTEXT01.
  34. Rodríguez-Modroño P. Youth unemployment, NEETs and structural inequality in Spain. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330434800_Youth_unemployment_NEETs_ and_structural_inequality_in_Spain.
  35. Saczyńska-Sokół S. Supporting NEETs - challenges facing labor market institutions in Poland. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324496870_Supporting_NEETs_-challenges_facing_labor_market_institutions_in_Poland.
  36. Serracant P. A brute indicator for a NEET case: Genesis and evolution of a problematic concept and results from an alternative indicator. Social Indicators Research. 2014; 117 (2).
  37. Slater D. Consumer Culture and Modernity. Cambridge; 1997.
  38. Shim S. Adolescent consumer decision-making styles: The consumer socialization perspective. Psychology & Marketing. 1996; 13 (6).
  39. Valkenburg P.M., Cantor J. The development of a child into a consumer. Applied Developmental Psychology. 2001; 22.
  40. Williams A. Move over, millennials, here comes generation Z. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/ 2015/09/20/fashion/move-over-millennials-here-comes-generation-z.html.

Copyright (c) 2022 Bulanova M.B., Artamonova E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies