Case-study method in the studies of the Russian rural cooperation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Qualitative methods are highly appreciated in both foreign and Russian sociological research focused on practical results and recommendations. Among numerous qualitative methods, case study seems to be the most relevant for the study of rural cooperation. Cooperatives are traditionally the most important means for supporting small producers in agriculture. Historical studies show that rural cooperation has always revived under social transformations. Today in Russia, transformations in rural areas are not complete and still determine serious social-economic consequences. The state support for cooperatives and small business is one of the priorities in rural development, but it has contradictory effects. Every year, many new cooperatives are registered, but their number is always smaller than the number of closed cooperatives. The study aims at understanding motives for creating cooperatives, and at identifying mechanisms of economic interaction of cooperative members and risks and conflicts that affect the life of the cooperative. The author shows the relevance of the case study method for studying the formation and functioning of cooperatives and for testing the hypothesis about combination of formal and informal mechanisms of economic interaction in cooperatives. The case study proved the dependence of formalization of economic relations in the cooperative on the scale of its activities, and revealed motives for cooperation of small agricultural producers. This work is a part of the research within the state assignment of the RANEPA “Informal economy of rural households: Possibilities and limitations of economic practices in increasing the potential and general attractiveness of rural areas”.

About the authors

L. A Ovchintseva

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: lovchintseva@gmail.com

кандидат экономических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований

prosp. Vernadskogo, 84, Moscow, 119571, Russia

References

  1. Bozhkov O.B., Trotsuk I.V. Tendentsii razvitiya selskikh rayonov Rossii: postanovka issledovatelskoy zadachi i pervye rezultaty povtornogo keys-stadi [Tendencies of the Russian rural areas development: The research task and first results of the comparative case-study]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (4) (In Russ.).
  2. Bondarenko L.V. Kontseptsiya snizheniya selskoy bednosti [Concept of the Rural Poverty Rreduction]. Moscow; 2007 (In Russ.).
  3. Klyueva N.V. Kachestvennye metody [Qualitative Methods]. Yaroslavl; 2016 (In Russ.).
  4. Krylatykh E.N., Frolova E.Yu. Potrebitelskaya kooperatsiya i fermery: vzaimnye interesy [Consumer cooperation and farmers: Mutual interests]. Fundamentalnye i Prikladnye Issledovaniya Kooperativnogo Sektora Ekonomiki. 2019; 2 (In Russ.).
  5. Maksimov A.F. Kolichestvenny analiz i otsenka chislennosti selskokhozyaystvennykh potrebitelskikh kooperativov [Quantitative analysis and assessment of the number of agricultural consumer cooperatives]. Prikladnye ekonomicheskie Issledovaniya. 2018; 6 (In Russ.).
  6. Maksimov A.F. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya selskokhozyaystvennykh potrebi-telskikh kooperativov v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Features of the agricultural consumer cooperatives in the contemporary conditions]. Nikonovskie Chteniya. 2018; 23 (In Russ.).
  7. Maksimov A.F. Selskokhozyaystvennye kreditnye potrebitelskie kooperativy v sovremennykh usloviyakh ikh funktsionirovaniya [Agricultural credit-consumer cooperatives in the contemporary conditions]. Fundamentalnye i Prikladnye Issledovaniya Kooperativnogo Sektora Ekonomiki. 2017; 2 (In Russ.).
  8. Ovchintseva L.A. “Otsenka iznutri” sotsialnykh protsessov na sele [“Participatory rural appraisal” of social processes in the countryside]. Nikonovskie Chteniya. 1997; 2 (In Russ.).
  9. Ovchintseva L.A. Vovlechenie naseleniya v ustoychivoe razvitie selskikh territoriy [Involvement of the population in the sustainable development of rural areas]. Nikonovskie Chteniya. 2004; 9 (In Russ.).
  10. Ovchintseva L.A. Budet li v blizhayshee vremya reshena problema selskoy bednosti? [Will the problem of rural poverty be solved in the near future?]. Indeks. Dosie na tsenzuru. 2004; 21 (In Russ.).
  11. Saraykin A.V., Yanbykh R.G. Analiz ustoychivosti kooperativnoy formy khozyaystvo-vaniya agrarnogo sektora Rossii v kontekste institutsionalnoy teorii firmy [Analysis of the stability of the cooperative form of farming in the Russian agrarian sector in the framework of the institutional theory of enterprise]. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2019; 35 (2) (In Russ.).
  12. Saraykin A.V., Yanbykh R.G. Klassifikatsiya kooperativov i razvitie selskokhozyay-stvennoy kooperatsii [Classification of cooperatives and the development of agricultural cooperation]. APK: Ekonomika, Ipravlenie. 2018; 7 (In Russ.).
  13. Semin A.N. Selskaya bednost: faktory generatsii i mekhanizmy preodoleniya [Rural poverty: Factors of development and mechanisms of overcoming]. Ekonomika Selskokhozyaystvennykh i Pererabatyvayushchikh Predpriyatiy. 2009; 12 (In Russ.).
  14. Skomorokhov S.N. Konkretizatsiya potentsialnykh problem kooperativa, trebuyushchikh reglamentatsii vo vnutrennikh pravilakh i reglamentakh [Potential problems of the cooperative, which require regulation in the internal rules and regulations]. Fundamentalnye i Prikladnye Issledovaniya Kooperativnogo Sektora Ekonomiki. 2018; 5 (In Russ.).
  15. Strauss A., Korbin J. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovaniya: obosnovannaya teoriya, protsedury i tekhniki [Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques]. Moscow; 2001 (In Russ.).
  16. Strekalova N.D. Keys-metod v nauchnykh issledovaniyakh magistrov menedzhmenta [Case-method in the scientific research of masters of management]. Problemy ustoychivogo razvitiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh sistem: region, gorod, rayon, organizatsiya. Nizhniy Novgorod; 2014 (In Russ.).
  17. Tavokin E.P. Sotsiologicheskaya informatsiya v upravlenii: rol, metody polucheniya i obrabotki [Sociological information in management: Role, methods of collecting and processing]. Moscow; 2008 (In Russ.).
  18. Trotsuk I.V. Vozmozhnosti metoda keys-stadi v izuchenii sotsialnykh problem sela [Possibilities of the case study method in the study of rural social problems]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2007; 4 (In Russ.).
  19. Trotsuk I.V. Monitoringi razvitiya selskikh territoriy: “kolichestvo”, “kachestvo” ili ikh sochetanie? [Rural development monitorings: “quantity”, “quality”, or a combination of both?]. Materialy IX Grushinskoy konferentsii “Sotsialnaya inzheneriya: kak sotsiologiya menyaet mir”. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).
  20. Trotsuk I.V. Putevoditel po postsovetskoy agrarnoy reforme v Rossii: ob’ektivnoe i sub’ektivnoe izmerenie selskoy zhizni [A guide to the post-soviet agrarian reform in Russia: Objective and subjective dimensions of rural life]. Krestyanovedeniye. 2017; 2 (3) (In Russ.).
  21. Shabanov V.L. Faktory i prichiny selskoy bednosti v sovremennoy Rossii [Factors and causes of rural poverty in contemporary Russia]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2014; 14 (4) (In Russ.).
  22. Shteinberg I., Shanin T., Kovalev E., Levinson A. Kachestvennye metody. Polevye issledovaniya [Qualitative Methods. Field Studies]. Saint Petersburg; 2009 (In Russ.).
  23. Baxter P.E., Jac S.M. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report. 2010; 13 (4).
  24. Bennett A., Elman C. Qualitative research: Recent developments in case study methods. Annual Review of Political Science. 2006; 9 (1).
  25. Collier D., Whright J.S., Brady H.E. Qualitative versus quantitative: What might this distinction mean? Qualitative Methods. 2003; 1 (1).
  26. Creswell J.W., Hanson W.E., Plano C., Vicki L., Morales A. Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. Counseling Psychologist. 2007; 35 (2).
  27. Creswell J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks; 2013.
  28. Creswell J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks; 2014.
  29. George A.L., Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in Social Sciences. Cambridge; 2005.
  30. Kurakin A., Visser O. Post-socialist agricultural cooperatives in Russia: A case study of top-down cooperatives in the Belgorod region. Post-Communist Economies. 2017; 29 (2).
  31. Looi Theam Choy. The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science. 2014; 19 (4).
  32. Mills E.J., Duperos G., Wiebe E. Encyclopedia of Case-Study Research. London; 2010.
  33. Sobolev A., Kurakin A., Pakhomov V., Trotsuk I. Cooperation in rural Russia: Past, present and future. Mir Rossii. 2018; 27 (1).
  34. Starman A.B. The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies. 2013; 1.

Copyright (c) 2020 Ovchintseva L.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies