The soviet version of modernity and its historical legacy: New theoretical approaches

Cover Page

Cite item


The article considers some approaches to the analysis of post-communist transformations in Russia and Central and Eastern Europe. In the studies of social-political changes in post-communist societies, there is a new turn towards the analysis of long-term historical processes and the cultural context of contemporary social transformations. The authors emphasize that the ‘new historicism’ in the studies of post-communist transformations follows the sociological theory of multiple modernities, although its importance is not always recognized by researchers. Its original version developed by Shmuel Eisenstadt in the 1990s was not free from certain limitations due to the concept of ‘cultural program’ that presupposes a high degree of path dependence; however, these limitations were overcome in the works of Johann Arnason and Peter Wagner. The studies of post-communist transformations are often based on the early versions of modernization theory which presupposed a smooth transition to the market economy and liberal democracy. However, this approach encountered difficulties under the reversal of economic and political liberalization. The multiple modernities theory overcomes the limitations of this approach, it is relevant for the analysis of transformation processes in contemporary Russia and other post-communist states. In the recent studies of the historical legacies of communism, they are not considered as a ‘cultural program’ determining the trajectory of social development. The article describes some contemporary conservative ideologies in Russia as an example of the Soviet historical legacy’s influence, and argues that various ‘ideological ecosystems’ present their own interpretations of modernity.

About the authors

E. V. Maslovskaya

Sociological Institute - branch of the FCTAS RAS

Author for correspondence.

доктор социологических наук, доцент, ведущий научный сотрудник сектора истории российской социологии

25/14, 7th Krasnoarmeiskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russia

M. V. Maslovskiy

Sociological Institute - branch of the FCTAS RAS


доктор социологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник сектора истории российской социологии

25/14, 7th Krasnoarmeiskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russia


  1. Александер Дж. Смыслы социальной жизни: культурсоциология. М., 2013 / Alexander J. Smysly sotsialnoi realnosti: kultursotsiologiya [Meanings of Social Reality: Cultural Sociology]. Moscow; 2013 (In Russ.).
  2. Арнасон Й. Коммунизм и модерн // Социологический журнал. 2011. № 1 / Arnason J. Kommunizm i modern [Communism and modernity]. Sotsiologichesky Zhurnal. 2011; 1 (In Russ.).
  3. Арнасон Й. Понимание межцивилизационного взаимодействия // Метод. 2015. Вып. 5 / Arnason J. Ponimanie mezhtsivilizatsionnogo vzaimodeistviya [Understanding intercivilizational encounters]. Method. 2015; 5 (In Russ.).
  4. Блоккер П. Сталкиваясь с модернизацией: открытость и закрытость другой Европы // Новое литературное обозрение. 2009. № 6 / Blokker P. Stalkivayas s modernizatsiei: otkrytost i zakrytost drugoi Evropy [Confronting modernization: Openness and closure of the other Europe]. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2009; 6 (In Russ.).
  5. Браславский Р.Г. Цивилизационная теоретическая перспектива в социологии // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 2 / Braslavskiy R. Tsivilizatsionnaya teoreticheskaya perspektiva v sotsiologii [Civilizational theoretical perspective in sociology]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013; 2 (In Russ.).
  6. Дэвид-Фокс М. Модерность в России и СССР: отсутствующая, общая, альтернативная или переплетенная? // Новое литературное обозрение. 2016. № 4 / David-Fox M. Modernost v Rossii i SSSR: otsutstvuyushchaya, obshchaya, alternativnaya ili perepletennaya? [Modernity in Russia and the USSR: Absent, common, alternative or entangled?] Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. 2016; 4 (In Russ.).
  7. Масловская Е.В., Масловский М.В. Концептуализация европейского модерна в социологии Джерарда Деланти // Социологическое обозрение. 2017. № 3 / Maslovskaya E., Maslovskiy M. Kontseptualizatsiya evropeiskogo moderna v sotsiologii Gerarda Delanty [Conceptualization of the European modernity in Gerard Delanty’s sociology]. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie. 2017; 3 (In Russ.).
  8. Подвойский Д.Г. Тропами модерна: социологические вариации на тему // Социологические исследования. 2013. № 10 / Podvoisky D. Tropami moderna: sotsiologicheskie variatsii na temu [Paths of modernity: Sociological variations on a theme]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2013; 10 (In Russ.).
  9. Arnason J. The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London: Routledge; 1993.
  10. Arnason J. Alternating modernities: The case of Czechoslovakia. European Journal of Social Theory. 2005; 8 (4).
  11. David-Fox M. Multiple modernities versus neo-traditionalism. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 2006; 54 (4).
  12. David-Fox M. Crossing Borders: Modernity, Ideology and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2015.
  13. Delanty G. The historical regions of Europe: Civilizational backgrounds and multiple routes to modernity. Historická Sociologie. 2012; 1-2.
  14. Delanty G. A transnational world? The implications of transnationalism for comparative historical sociology. Social Imaginaries. 2016; 2 (2).
  15. Eisenstadt S. The civilizational dimension of modernity: Modernity as a distinct civilization. International Sociology. 2001; 16 (3).
  16. Ekiert G. Three generations of research on post-communist politics - a sketch. East European Politics and Societies. 2015; 29 (2).
  17. Jowitt K. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.
  18. Knöbl W. Path dependency and civilizational analysis: Methodological challenges and theoretical tasks. European Journal of Social Theory. 2010; 13 (1).
  19. Knöbl W. Contingency and modernity in the thought of J.P. Arnason. European Journal of Social Theory 2011; 14 (1).
  20. Kotkin S., Beissinger M. The historical legacies of communism: An empirical agenda. M. Beissinger, S. Kotkin (Eds.) Historical Legacies of Communism in Russia and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
  21. Laruelle M. The Kremlin’s ideological ecosystems: Equilibrium and competition // PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 493. November 2017.
  22. Sakwa R. The Soviet collapse: Contradictions and neo-modernization. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2013; 4 (1).
  23. Spohn W. World history, civilizational analysis and historical sociology: Interpretations of non-western civilizations in the work of Johann Arnason. European Journal of Social Theory. 2011;14 (1).
  24. Wagner P. A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline. London: Routledge; 1994.
  25. Wagner P. The project of emancipation and the possibility of politics or what’s wrong with post-1968 individualism. Thesis Eleven. 2002; 68 (1).
  26. Wagner P. Modernity as Experience and Interpretation: A New Sociology of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity; 2008.
  27. Wagner P. Interpreting the present - a research programme. Social Imaginaries. 2015; 1 (1).

Copyright (c) 2020 Maslovskaya E.V., Maslovskiy M.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies