Sociology on the move: The demand for the humanistic digital turn

Cover Page

Cite item


Digitalization of society has ambivalent consequences: there are new benefits (‘smart’ technologies, artificial intellect, multiple knowledge), but at the same time digital risks and metamorphoses that traumatize the behavior and thinking of people, alienate them from social ties and life-worlds. These processes have become a challenge for sociology and other social sciences that strive to develop new approaches, among which the digital and humanistic turns are the most relevant. The author aims at (a) analyzing the impact of digitalization on the production of metamorphoses and side effects on society and man, which are related to new complex risks and manifest challenges to sociology; (b) developing the contours of the conception of ‘the digital turn in sociology’ and identifying its essence in comparison with other, previous turns in sociology - linguistic, risk, cultural, etc.; (c) proposing the means that allow to overcome or minimize the side effects of the existing type of digitalization - the author argues for the demand to move sociology in the direction of the integral use of the instruments of the digital and humanistic turns. The article considers new challenges to mankind and scientific knowledge as determined not so much by the very process of digitalization, but by its existing type based on principles of formal rationality, pragmatism, and mercantilism neglecting, in fact, life-worlds of people. This type of digitalization is not ‘universal’ and can be changed by an alternative humanistic trend of digitalization. In order to begin establishing the humanistic trend of digitalization scientists should integrate the theoretical instruments of the proposed digital turn with other interdisciplinary turns and especially with the humanistic turn.

About the authors

S. A. Kravchenko

Moscow State University of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia (MGIMO University); Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.

доктор философских наук, заведующий кафедрой социологии Московского государственного института международных отношений (Университета) Министерства иностранных дел России; главный научный сотрудник Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук

Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35, bldg. 5, Moscow, 117218, Russia


  1. Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso; 1983.
  2. Beck U. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010.
  3. Beck U. The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016.
  4. Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. Distant Love: Personal Life in the Global Age. Beck-Gernsheim; 2014.
  5. Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2015.
  6. Bustillos J. The digital divide. Neoliberal imperatives and education. S. Isaacs (Ed.). European Social Problems. London - New York: Routledge; 2017.
  7. Castells M. (Ed.) Another Economy is Possible. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017.
  8. Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
  9. Elliott A., Urry J. Mobile Lives. New York: Routledge; 2010.
  10. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1963.
  11. Goffman E. On cooling the mark out: Some aspects of adaptation to failure. Psychiatry. 1952; 15 (4).
  12. Kravchenko S.A. Sociology on the move to interaction of theoretical and methodological approaches. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania. 2011; 1 (In Russ.).
  13. Kravchenko S.A. Becoming complex social reality: Issues of vulnerabilities. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania. 2013; 5 (In Russ.).
  14. Kravchenko S.A. ‘A normal anomie’: Contours of conception. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania. 2014; 8 (In Russ.).
  15. Kravchenko S.A. Metamorphoses: Essence, increasingly complex types, place in sociology of knowledge. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania. 2017; 10 (In Russ.).
  16. Kravchenko S.A. The coexistence of riskophobia and riskophilia - an expression of ‘normal anomie’. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania. 2017; 2 (In Russ.).
  17. Kravchenko S.A., Perova A.E. ‘New catastrophism’ and the future: The demand for non-linear knowledge. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2014; 17 (4).
  18. Marres N. Digital Sociology. The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017.
  19. Mosco V. Becoming Digital. Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2017.
  20. Perrow Ch. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1999.
  21. Perrow Ch. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton University Press; 2011.
  22. Prigogine I. The End of Certainty. New York: Free Press; 1997.
  23. Urry J. Climate Change and Society. Malden: Polity Press; 2011.
  24. Vanderburg W.H. Our Battler for the Human Spirit: Scientific Knowing, Technical Doing, and Daily Living. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2016.

Copyright (c) 2019 Kravchenko S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies