NATIONAL VALUES OF THE RUSSIAN EDUCATION UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL INTEGRATION

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

One of the widely discussed challenges under the international integration of the Russian education is the preservation of national educational values. The fate of the Russian educational traditions largely depends on the attitudes of the scientific-pedagogical community towards them. The article aims to identify the position of the representatives of this social-professional group to the values of the national education, to describe their role in the processes of modernization of the Russian education. The main empirical basis of the article is the contemporary Russian scientific-educational discourse - articles and monographs considering the values of the Russian education and their role in the processes of international integration of education. The key method of the research is the qualitative content analysis of a wide range of research texts. Based on the results of the analysis of the contemporary scientific-pedagogical discourse, the authors identify three main approaches to the traditions of the national education: nihilistic, apologetic, and realistic. The authors emphasize the counter-productiveness of both unambiguously positive and unambiguously negative attitudes toward these traditions and insist on the creative potential of the realistic, i.e. critically-analytical, approach. The article affirms the significance of the versatile (multidisciplinary) education, of the fundamental, holistic, systemic, elite education, and the great importance of the unity of education together with the high value of patriotic education. The specificity of these values is revealed through correlation with their antipodes such as narrow, limited-applied, eclectic-fragmentary, mass, morally and patriotically neutral education. The authors believe that the competitive education is the one that aims at developing of creative-scientific competences rather than utilitarian-technological ones.

About the authors

G F Shafranov-Kutsev

Tyumen State University

Email: shafranov-kutsev@utmn.ru
- Lenina St., 25, Tyumen, 625000, Russia

E N Yarkova

Tyumen State University

Email: yarkovaeleni@yandex.ru
- Lenina St., 25, Tyumen, 625000, Russia

References

  1. Ashin G.K. Elitnoe obrazovanie [Elite education]. Obschestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost. 2001; 5: 82-99 (In Russ.).
  2. Boguslavsky M.V. Konservativnaja strategija modernizacii rossijskogo obrazovanija v XX - nachale XXI veka [The conservative strategy of modernization of the Russian education in the 20 - early 21 century]. Problemy Sovremennogo Obrazovaniya. 2014; 1: 5-11 (In Russ.).
  3. Chetverikova O.N. Perestrojka obrazovanija i vospitanija v Rossii skvoz prizmu geopolitiki [Reconstruction of the Russian education through the prism of geopolitics]. Vestnik Eletskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta im. I.A. Bunina. Serija: Pedagogika. 2015: 3-30 (In Russ.).
  4. Egorychev A.M. Nacionalnaja tradicija zhizni i socialnoe obrazovanie v Rossii [National tradition of life and social education in Russia]. Alma Mater. 2016; 10: 20-28 (In Russ.).
  5. Gilbo E.V. O vysshem obrazovanii v SSSR i RF [On the higher education in the USSR and Russia]. http://shel-gilbo.livejournal.com/99182.html (In Russ.).
  6. Gritsenko I.A. Klipovoe myshlenie - novy etap razvitija chelovechestva [Clip thinking as a new stage in the development of humankind]. Uchenye Zapiski. 2015; 4: 71-74 (In Russ.).
  7. Kharseeva N.V., Yanko E.V. Problemy duhovno-nravstvennogo vospitanija v sovremennoj Rossii [Problems of spiritual-moral education in contemporary Russia]. Aspectus. 2015; 2: 59-65 (In Russ.).
  8. Hedstrom P., Ylikoski P. Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology. 2010; 36: 49-67.
  9. Karypov A. Fundamentalnoe obrazovanie kak glavnoe konkurentnoe preimuschestvo [Fundamental education as a key competitive advantage]. Pervy Ekonomichesky. 2016; 58: 56-58 (In Russ.).
  10. Khorova P.A. K voprosu o tradiciyah rossijskogo obrazovaniya [On the traditions of the Russian education]. Khorova P.A., Vishnevsky Yu.R. (Eds.) Innovacionny potencial molodezhi: globalizaciya, politika, integraciya. Ekaterinburg; 2016. Pp. 507-511 (In Russ.).
  11. Kolin K.K. Informacionnaja antropologija: pokolenie next i novaja ugroza rassloenija chelovechestva v informacionnom obshhestve [Information anthropology: Generation ‘next’, and a new risk of the stratification of humankind in information society]. Vestnik Chelyabinskoj Gosudarstvennoj Akademii Kultury i Iskusstv. 2011; 4 (28): 32-36 (In Russ.).
  12. Kopkas J. Is the casting of utilitarian as discordant with arts education philosophy justified? Journal of Thought. 2013; 5: 52-72.
  13. Maleeva A. Shkolny standart [The school standard]. Mashiny i Mekhanizmy. 2011; 9: 28-35 (In Russ.).
  14. Matveeva S.V., Filinova N.V., Matveev P.A. Patrioticheskoe vospitanie kak faktor formirovanija cennostnyh ustanovok v vysshej shkole [Patriotic education as a factor of the values formation in the higher school]. Problemy Sovremennogo Pedagogicheskogo Obrazovaniya. 2016; 51: 270-276 (In Russ.).
  15. Mironov V.V. Bolonsky process i nacionalnaja sistema obrazovanija [The Bologna process and the national system of education]. Vestnik OGU: Gumantarnye Nauki. 2005; 2: 4-8 (In Russ.).
  16. Nadeeva M.I. Obrazovatelnye cennosti i formirovanie obschekulturnoj kompetencii studentov tehnologicheskogo universiteta [Educational values and the formation of the students’ general cultural competence in the technological university]. Vestnik Kazanskogo Tekhnologicheskogo Universiteta. 2011; 22: 333-337 (In Russ.).
  17. Newcombe N.S., Ambady N., Louis Gomez J., Klahr D., Linn M., Miller K., Mix K. Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist. 2009; 64 (6): 538-550.
  18. Novikov A.M. Chto takoe elitarnoe obrazovanie [What the elite education is]. Narodnoe Obrazovanie. 2004; 1: 62-66 (In Russ.).
  19. Ogurtsov A.P. Postmodernistsky obraz cheloveka i pedagogika [The postmodernist image of man and pedagogy]. Chelovek. 2001; 3-4: 18-27 (In Russ.).
  20. Patsukevich O.V. Massovizacija vysshego obrazovanija kak sledstvie globalizacii [Massivization of the higher education as a consequence of globalization]. http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/ 32264/1/klo_2015_124.pdf (In Russ.).
  21. Prokhorov V.A. Fundamentalnost - osnovnoj princip postroenija inzhenernogo obrazovanija [Fundamental basis as a key principle of the engineering education]. Inzhenernoe Obrazovanie. 2012; 11: 82-84 (In Russ.).
  22. Schoenebeck von H. Antipadagogik im Dialog: eine Einfiihrung in antipadagogische. Basel; 1989.
  23. Sharonova S.A. Gumanitarnaja sostavljajushhaja fragmentarnogo obrazovanija [The humanitarian component of the fragmentary education]. E.A. Zeletdinova (Ed.). Socialno-gumanitarnoe obrazovanie vysshej shkoly Rossii v XXI veke. Astrakhan; 2009. Pp. 38-45 (In Russ.).
  24. Mahmoudi S., Jafari E., Nasrabadi H.A., Liaghatdar M.J. Holistic education: An approach for 21 century. International Education Studies. 2012; 5 (2): 178-186.
  25. Starr D. China and the Confucian Education Model. Durham University; 2012.
  26. Tarrant I., Tarrant J. Satisfied fools: Using J.S. Mill’s notion of utility to analyze the impact of vocationalism in education within a democratic society. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2004; 38 (1): 107-120.
  27. Koncepciya patrioticheskogo vospitaniya v Rossii. Istoricheskaya pamyat i grazhdanskoe samosoznanie [Conception of the Patriotic Education in Russia. Historical Memory and Civil Self-Conscience]. Moscow; 2014 (In Russ.).
  28. Upasana K. A comparative study of traditional education & education with special reference to India. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies. 2014; 2 (5): 149-162.
  29. Vakhitov D.R. Obrazovatelnye sistemy SSSR i Zapada: sravnitelny analiz preimuschestv i nedostatkov [Educational systems of the USSR and the West: A comparative analysis of advantages and disadvantages]. Vestnik TISBI. 2015; 1: 216-235 (In Russ.).
  30. Zapesotsky A.S. Ideya kulturocentristskoj modeli obrazovaniya [The idea of culture-centered model of education]. A.S. Zapesotsky (Ed.). Kulturno-antropologicheskie osnovy obrazovatelnoj deyatelnosti: k voprosu o razrabotke kulturocentristskoj modeli vysshego obrazovaniya. Saint Petersburg; 2009. Pp. 11-26 (In Russ.).
  31. Zharenova O.A., Kechil N.V., Pakhomov E.Yu. Intellektualnaja migracija rossijan. Blizhnee i dalnee zarubezhie [Intellectual Migration of Russians. The Near and Far Abroad]. Moscow; 2002 (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2018 Shafranov-Kutsev G.F., Yarkova E.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies