Specific Developmental Disorders of School Skills and Phonological Deficit: the Problems of Comorbidity

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The author examines approaches to understanding specific developmental disorders of school skills formulated in Russia, their transformation in the recent decades as well as controversial points concerning the use of the terms ‘dysgraphia’, ‘dysorthography’, ‘dyslexia’. The scientific work highlights the fact that the comorbid problem of school skills developmental disorders has not been sufficiently elaborated in Russia. Practical solutions in terms of assisting underachieving school students as well as thorough understanding of the cognitive mechanisms of learning disorders account for the significance of its study. The article discusses the results of the research into comorbidity of writing disorders (dysgraphia and dysorthographia) and reading disorders in 2-4 grade students with learning disabilities. It provides the data from the study of written works, reading as well as phonological skills of 95 schoolchildren whose parents complained about learning difficulties. The study was carried out online. The article concludes that there is an asymmetry between writing skill disorders and reading skill disorders in school children with learning disabilities: writing disorders are more persistent and more frequently detected. Separate disorders of reading are practically non-existent whereas disorders of writing abilities are rather common. The nature of writing and reading disorders comorbidity changes from grades 2 to 4: from combined writing and reading disorders to separate writing only disorders. The article presents the age dynamics of graphics and spelling skill acquisition problems as well as a progressive nature of dysorthographia and relative stability of the quantity of dysgraphic mistakes. The provided findings of phonological awareness literacy screening tests (independent from training) of underachieving school students do not support improvement of these skills with age. A significant correlation between phonological processing skills and reading and graphics acquisition has been discovered in addition to a connection between fluency aspects of reading and the quantity of dysgraphic errors. The article proves an absence or a rather weak connection between phonemic recognition and spelling mistakes. A conclusion has been drawn in terms of pathogenic factors resulting in issues with mastering reading, graphics and spelling being genetically close though not identical.

About the authors

Olga A. Velichenkova

Moscow City Pedagogical University; Kazan Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: velichenkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7366-9050
SPIN-code: 4651-5510

PhD in Pedagogy, Аssociate professor at the Department of speech Therapy of the Institute of Special Education and Psychology of the Moscow City Pedagogical University ; Senior Researcher, Neurocognitive Research Laboratory, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

2-j Sel’skohozyajstvennyj, 4, Moscow, 4129226, Russian Federation; 18, Kremlevskaya St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420008

References

  1. Tokareva, O.A. (1971). Writing disorders in different groups of abnormal children and principles of therapy. In: Pathology of speech: Scientific notes of MGPI. Vol. 406. Moscow: MGPI. pp. 63–98. (In Russ.).
  2. Kornev, A.N. (2003). Disorders of reading and writing in children. Saint Petersburg: Rech. (In Russ.).
  3. Rusetskaya, M.N. (2007). Reading disorders in primary school students: analysis of speech and visual causes: [Monograph]. Saint Petersburg: Karo. (In Russ.).
  4. Lalaeva, R.I. (2019). Reading disorders and ways to correct them in primary school students. Saint Petersburg: Karo. (In Russ.).
  5. Grigorenko, E.L. & Elliott, J.J. (2012). Reading about reading. Voronezh: Stork. (In Russ.).
  6. Tseitlin, S.N. & Bogomazov, G.M. (2006). Age phonology (the two-level phonological system and its role in creating linguistic feeling and literacy in pupils of 1–6 forms). Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 5, 146–148. (In Russ.).
  7. Levina, R.E. & Pravdina, O.V. (1939). On the fight against the academic failure of children of alexics and agrafiks. Soviet pedagogy, 2, 89–95. (In Russ.).
  8. Levina, R.E. (2005). Speech and writing disorders in children. In: Selected works, G.V. Chirkina, P.B. Shoshin (eds.). Moscow: ARKTI. (In Russ.).
  9. Komarova, V.V., Milostivenko, L.G. & Sumchenko, G.M. (1992). The ratio of dysgraphic and dysorphographic errors in primary school students with speech disorders. In: Pathology of speech. Saint Petersburg: Obrazovanie. pp. 98–102. (In Russ.).
  10. Prishchepova, I.V. (2021). System of speech therapy for the prevention and overcoming of dysorphography in students with speech and language disorders: monograph. Saint Petersburg: A.I. Herzen State Pedagogical University Publ. (In Russ.).
  11. Azova, O.I. (2021). Speech therapy. Dysorphography. Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russ.).
  12. Grigorenko, E.L., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, L.S., Wagner, R.K., Willcutt, E.G. & Fletcher, J.M. (2019). Understanding, Educating, and Supporting Children with Specific Learning Disabilities: 50 Years of Science and Practice. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452 (accessed: 23.01.2024).
  13. Silchenkova, L.S. (2017). Theory and history of the national methodology of literacy and letteristics. Moscow: Moscow City Pedagogical University Publ. (In Russ.).
  14. Braudel, F. (2014). Grammar of civilizations; State Lit. The museum. Moscow: The Whole World. (In Russ.).
  15. Petrova, M.V. (2020). “Easy language”: the language policy of inclusivity to ensure barrierfree communication in Germany. In: Extrability as a phenomenon of inclusive culture: the formation of an inclusive culture in organizations: Proceedings of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International participation, Yekaterinburg, December 12–13, 2019. Yekaterinburg: Azhur. pp. 217–222. (In Russ.).
  16. Osokina, S.A. (2022). The Concept of “Easy Language” and its Perspectives in Linguistics. Philology & Human, 2, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel (2022)2-08 (In Russ.).
  17. Akhutina, T.V. (2018). Neuropsychological analysis of errors in writing. In: Disorders of writing and reading in children: study and overcoming. Scientific monograph, O.A. Velichenkova (Ed.). Moscow. pp. 76–95. (In Russ.).
  18. Dorofeeva, S.V., Reshetnikova, V.A., Zyryanov, A.S., Goranskaya, D.N., Gordeeva, E., Serebryakova, M., Akhutina, T. & Dragoi, O.V. (2018). Battery of tests to identify the features of phonological processing in Russian-speaking children: indicators of typically developing children and groups of children with dyslexia. In: The Eighth International Conference on cognitive Science: Abstracts of reports. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. pp. 331–333. (In Russ.).
  19. Velichenkova, O.A., Belousova, K.V. & Khakimullina, R.R. (2022). Age-related indicators of phonological working memory of younger schoolchildren with learning difficulties (according to online diagnostics). MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 16 (3), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.3.11 (In Russ.).
  20. Velichenkova, O.A. & Guseva, V.G. (2022). Performance in auditory and speech tests among schoolchildren with learning disabilities. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 164 (1–2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2022.1-2.28-40 (In Russ.).
  21. Inshakova, O.B. (2013). Multidisciplinary analysis of the development of phonemic writing skills in primary school students: monograph. Moscow: V. Sekachev. (In Russ.).
  22. Dorofeeva, S., Iskra, E., Goranskaya, D., Gordeyeva, E., Serebryakova, M., Zyryanov, A., Dragoy, O. & Akhutina, T. (2022). Cognitive Requirements of the Phonological Tests Affect Their Ability to Discriminate Children with and Without Developmental Dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65 (10), 3809–3826. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00687
  23. Neuropsychological diagnostics, examination of writing and reading of younger schoolchildren (2008). T.V. Akhutina, O.B. Inshakova (eds.). Moscow: Sphere: V. Sekachev. (In Russ.).
  24. Rul (Eliseeva), N., Gorobets, E. & Rezina, I. (2018). Non-word repetition by russian-speaking children: Materials for a neurolinguistic questionnaire. Philology and culture, 2 (52), 121–127. (In Russ.).
  25. Gathercole, S.E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 23 (1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03210559
  26. Eliseeva, N. & Marini, A. (2017). Phonological working memory and inhibition control in language impaired (LI) children. In: Experimental Psycholinguistics Conference Proceedings (Menorca, June 28–30). Menorca.
  27. Fawcett, A. & Nicolson, R. (2004). The Dyslexia Screening Test: Junior (DST-J). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.
  28. Dollaghan, C.A., Biber, M.E. & Campbell, T.F. (1995). Lexical influences on nonword repetition. Applied Psycho-linguistics, 16 (2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007098
  29. Estes, K.G., Evans, J.L. & Else-Quest, N.M. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388 (2007/015)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Fig. 1. The average number of dysgraphic and spelling mistakes made by 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities

Download (49KB)
Indexing metadata
2. Fig. 2. The percentage of 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities in studying Russian

Download (45KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 3. Percentage of 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities who failed to master graphics

Download (48KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 4. Percentage of 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities who failed to master spelling

Download (49KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 5. Correlation of dysgraphia and spelling mistakes in 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities, % with prevailing mistakes of a certain kind.

Download (78KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 6. Percentage of 2–4 grade school children with learning disabilities and low reading fluency

Download (82KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Velichenkova O.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies