Gender Stereotypes in Kazakh Proverbs and Sayings

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study reviewst how traditional gender norms are parodied in Kazakh. Stereotypes of “male” and “female” characteristics are evolving in the age of cultural globalization. The old notion that a man provides for the family needs financially and a woman tends to the home has evolved. In modern Kazakh society, a woman can earn significantly more than a male or serve as the family primary breadwinner. Many men believe that raising children and taking care of the home is the domain of women, so they do not want to be involved in these roles. Gender stereotypes prevailing in society prevent both women and men from living, determining their behavior and lifestyle. The relevance of the problem under consideration lies in the fact that the factors contributing to the formation of gender stereotypes have not been sufficiently studied. The parodies of the Kazakh people reflect traditional family and tribal relations based on patriarchal attitudes. The purpose of the study is to analyze gender stereotypes in Kazakh proverbs and sayings. Due to the large number entries of the main sample, 154 paremias were taken through a representative sample and grouped into five categories according to their content: 1. The role of men and women in the family, 2. Education of girls - education of the nation, 3. Preservation of family life, 4. Feminine and masculine qualities, 5. A woman mother gives birth to offsprings. The study used comprehensive research, contextual analysis, comparison and descriptive methods. As a result of the study, the stereotype “A woman is the basis, and a man is the breadwinner of the family” has partially lost its relevance today. In modern Kazakh society, the wife not only supports family comfort, but also earns quite well. The stereotype “A mother woman gives birth to offspring” always remains the same relevant, since the main function of a woman is procreation. The traditional stereotype of “Educating girls - educating the nation” is formed in relation to the upbringing of girls in the family. Since girls are future mothers and guardians of the hearth, from an early age they are prepared for family life, motherhood and household chores. The stereotype associated with the preservation of family life depicts a woman as a man’s support, an incomparable companion, his luck and even paradise. The key to a happy family life is a good spouse, so stereotypes are formed regarding the preservation of family life.

Full Text

-
×

About the authors

Amangul S. Igissinova

Dulaty University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kas-id-3@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9646-316X

Master of Philology, Senior Teacher of the Department «Foreign Philology and Translation Studies»

080000, Republic of Kazakhstan, Taraz, ul. Tole bi 60

Gulzat Magauovna Raeva

Kazakh National Pedagogical Abai University

Email: raeva09@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7041-4856

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Kazakh Language and Literature named after Academician S.Kirabaev

050001, Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Dostyk ave. 13

Ziba Abdullakyzy Kulamanova

Dulaty University

Email: kulamanovaziba@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6427-5560

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Philology and Journalism

080000, Republic of Kazakhstan, Taraz, ul. Tole bi 60

References

  1. Egorova, A.I., Kondakova, A.P. & Kuzhuget, M.A. (2020). Gender stereotypes in Tuvan proverbs and sayings. The New Research of Tuva, 1, 19-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2020.1.2 (In Russ.).
  2. Zhulduz, R., Zhankara, D. & Ali, N.L.B.H. (2019). Various Aspects of Paremiological Units. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 985-996. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.43.985996
  3. Kaidar, A. (2004). Folk wisdom. Almaty: Tolganay publ. (In Kazakh). Kaidar A. Khalyk danalygy. Almaty: Tolganay Publ., 2004.
  4. Denisova, A.A. (Ed.). (2002). Dictionary of Gender Terms. Moscow: Information XXI century. (In Russ.).
  5. Akhmadeeva, K.N. Stereotypes as a problem of gender studies [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.isras.ru/abstarct_bank/1214469800.pdf
  6. Ryabova, T.B. (2001). Gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping: Methodological approaches. A woman in Russian society, 3-4, 3-12. (In Russ.).
  7. Baigutova, A.M. (2008). Ethno-cultural nature of the concept of “Kazakh wife” [dissertation]. Almaty. (In Kazakh). Baigutova A.M. «Kazak aieli» kontseptisinin etnomadeni sipaty. Almaty.
  8. Shokym, G. (2012). Fundamentals of gender linguistics. Almaty: Ekonomika. (In Kazakh). Shokym G. Genderlik lingvistika negizderi: okulyk. Almaty: Ekonomika.
  9. Zykova, I.V. (2011). Phraseological Images and their National Conditionality. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 2, 80-88. (In Russ.).
  10. Mokienko, V.M. (2015). Aspects of the study of Slavic paremiology. In: Paremiology in discourse, O.V. Lomakina (Ed.). Moscow. pp. 4-25. (In Russ.).
  11. Bredis, M.A. (2017). Representations of monetary relations in proverbs (based on the material of Russian, Latvian, Lithuanian, German and English languages) [dissertation]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  12. Moiseeva, D.P. (2015). “The Experienced Space” in the Paroemias of Valle D’aosta (based on Franco-Provencal Material). Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 4, 93-100. (In Russ.).
  13. Bochina, T.G. (2015). Dialogic character of Russian paremics. In: Paremiology in discourse, O.V. Lomakina (Ed.). Moscow: Lenand. pp. 26-47. (In Russ.).
  14. Smagulova, G. (2017). Gender issues in Paremia. Bulletin of Shokan Ualikhanov Kokshetau University. Philological series, 4, 198-203. (In Kazakh). Smagulova G. Paremiiadagy genderlik maseleler // Bulletin of Shokan Ualikhanov Kokshetau University. Philological series. 2017. № 4. С. 198-203.
  15. Lips, H.M. (1997). Sex and Gender: An Introduction. Radford: Radford Univ. Press. P. 27.
  16. Williams, C.L. (1992). The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the “Female” Professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096961

Copyright (c) 2024 Igissinova A.S., Raeva G.M., Kulamanova Z.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies