From Language Teaching Science to General and Applied Linguistic Science. Reflexive Verbs: Linguistic Educt & Language Teaching Recommended Guideline

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This study is to complete the research in the Russian reflexive verbs - first in a series of articles intended to demonstrate how language teaching could correct some points of General Linguistics. This paper capture the lessons learned and gives recommendations on how the complicated phenomenon can be quite simply presented to foreign audiences when teaching the Russian language. Linguistically postfix -sya that marks reflexive verbs is to regulate subject - object balance within utterance in accordance with the speaker’s intention. And thus, voice of verbs is not so much a verbal category as a syntactic one. In terms of teaching, it is proposed to use a continuum scale with extreme points “100% active - 100% passive” based on the idea of “independence” of the subject S1. It is proposed to use the concept of “closed system”, borrowed from physics. There are 3 zones on the scale: an undoubted asset - a “transition zone” - an undoubted liability. This makes the phenomenon of reflexivity simple and understandable and removes a number of difficulties.

About the authors

Nataliia V. Krashevskaia

Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAIK)

Author for correspondence.
Email: breshka2@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6016-5740
SPIN-code: 1968-3148

PhD, General Linguistics, Russian Language, Education Associate Prof., Dpt of Linguistics

4 Gorokhovsky Lane, Moscow, 105064, Russian Federation

References

  1. Krashevskaya, N.V., and A.A. Basmanova. 2021. From linguodidactics to linguistics: paradoxes of reciprocal verbs in the Russian language. Modern pedagogical education. Scientific journal, no. 6, pp. 121–126. https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-8328-2021-6-121-126
  2. Krashevskaya, N.V., and A.A. Basmanova. 2022. From linguodidactics to linguistics: the scale of “degree of independence” as a way to eliminate and explain the paradoxes of recurrent glares in the Russian language. Modern pedagogical education, no. 1, pp. 236–242. https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-8328-2022-1-236-242
  3. Mel’nikov, G.P. 2003. The system typology of languages. Principles, methods, models. Moscow: Nauka, 308 p.
  4. Vyazovskaya, V.V. 2017. Reflexive verbs in the practice of teaching Russian as a foreign language. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, no. 7, part 1, pp. 183–185.
  5. Mel’nikov, V.I. The theory of a closed system. Monograph. 4th edition. Available from: http://www.vixri.ru/d/Melnikov%20V.I.%20_Teorija%20zamknutoj%20sistemy.pdf (date of application 09.01.2024).
  6. Lutin, S.A. 2008. System-functional analysis of the category of case in the Russian language: Diss.. doct. Philol. Sciences. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. 484 p.

Copyright (c) 2024 Krashevskaia N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies