Independence of prosecutors in the Russian justice system

Cover Page


Based on the data of the sociological survey, the author considers the attitude of prosecutors to their own independence and to the circumstances that can affect it. The questionnaire focused on the opinions of prosecutors and various aspects of the impact on their decisions: higher management, pressure from the media, representatives of state authorities, etc. The results of the survey prove that the relationship between the higher management and public authorities in the field of their impact on the independence of prosecutors has both functional-hierarchical and real reasons. The study revealed a coincidence of the high level of dependence on the authorities with the high level of management interference in the procedural activities of prosecutors, which allows to suggest that in most cases officials put pressure on prosecutors through their higher management. The results of the survey show that with experience the level of critical evaluation of authorities’ attempts to influence the process and the results of the prosecutors’ work increases. If young professionals do not feel rejection when face the intervention of the authorities, then with the growth of experience negative assessments of such actions appear and gradually strengthen. At the same time, the revealed indicators do not allow to say that for inexperienced prosecutors at the first stages of their professional development the phenomenon of power is unknown or unclear. On the contrary, they are familiar with it and feel the most favorable attitude towards it.

About the authors

S A Bochkarev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Lomonosovsky Prosp., 27, GSP-1, Moscow, Russia, 119991


  1. Abramov R.N., Bykov A.V. Professionalnaya etika kak obiekt sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya: mezhdu sotsiologiey morali i sotsiologiey professiy [Professional ethics as a subject of sociological study: Between sociology of morality and sociology of professions]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (4) (In Russ.).
  2. Bochkarev S.A. Sostoyanie nezavisimosti institutov pravosudiya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie [Independence of justice institutions in the Russian Federation: A sociological study]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).
  3. Guskova A.V. Ot chego zavisit sudebnaya vlast [What the judicial branch depends on]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).
  4. Kovtun N.N. Protsessualnaya nezavisimost suda: ternisty put ot kommunisticheskikh mifov k obiektivnoy realnosti rossiyskogo pravosudiya [The procedural independence of the court: the thorny path from communist myths to the objective reality of the Russian justice]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).
  5. Lapaeva V.V. Pravo i pravovoe gosudarstvo v postsotsialisticheskoy Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Law and the rule of law in post-socialist Russia: Current state and development prospects]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 7 (In Russ.).
  6. Maslovskaya E.V. Sotsiologichesky analiz vzaimodeystviya yuristov i sudebnykh ekspertov: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody [Sociological analysis of interaction of jurists and forensic experts: Theoretical-methodological approaches]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (3) (In Russ.).
  7. Nisnevich Yu.A. Sudebnaya sistema postsovetskoy Rossii: sotsialny kontekst [The judicial system of post-Soviet Russia: A social context]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2019; 8 (In Russ.).
  8. Popova T.V., Kalashnikova A.S. Nauchno-prakticheskie rekomendatsii po profilaktike emotsionalnogo vygoraniya u sudey [Scientific-practical recommendations for the prevention of judges’ burnout]. Psikhologiya i Pravo. 2018; 8 (1) (In Russ.).
  9. Smirnov A.V. O nezavisimosti, bespristrastnosti i spravedlivosti sudebnoy vlasti [On the independence, impartiality and justice of the judiciary]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).
  10. Tsvetkov Yu.A. Nezavisimost sudey v mekhanizme upravleniya sudebnoy sistemoy [Independence of judges in the judicial system management]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).
  11. Shadrin V.S. Obespechenie nezavisimosti sudey kak odno iz osnovanit reformy sudebnoy sistemy [Ensuring the independence of judges as a foundation of the judicial reform]. Rossiysky Zhurnal Pravovykh Issledovany. 2019; 1 (In Russ.).



Abstract - 311

PDF (Russian) - 241




Copyright (c) 2019 Bochkarev S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies