EDUCATION AND METHODOLOGY: FROM ESSENCE TO DUE

Cover Page

Abstract


This article is devoted to the problem, which has not yet been investigated in relation to the field of foreign language (including Russian) of education, namely, the problem of convergence of education as a phenomenon and methodology as a science. To solve this problem in the first part of the article deals with education as a phenomenon.Proposes a new interpretation of the education hierarchy and the principles of its construction. The author puts forward the idea that the education system needs to be designed as isofunctional model of the socialization process. In the second part it is argued that the technique is essentially the arch-Tector of the education system for what it is from a certain application of the science of language training needs to developing the theory and technology of education. The author presents the main characteristics of the new methodology. The main message of the article is to prove the following statements: No new me-codici basically impossible to build an effective education system. It is therefore necessary to the transition from essence to due.


About the authors

E I Passov

Yelets state University of I.A. Bunin

Author for correspondence.
Email: eipassov@rambler.ru
Communards, 28, Yelets, Lipetsk oblast, Russia, 399770

Passov Yefim Izrailevich, Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, founder of the scientific school “Passovsky Methodical School”, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professors, pecialist in the field of methods of foreign language education. Head of the Russian Center for Foreign Language Education, Professor Yelets State University. Honorary Professor of the Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University, Honorary Professor of the Minsk State Linguistic University, Professor of the Department of Humanitarian Education of the Institute for the Development of Education of the Lipetsk Region.

References

  1. Ilichev, L.F., Fedoseev, P.N., Kovalev, S.M., & Papov,V.G. (1983). Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Sov. Entsiklopediya Publ. (In Russ).
  2. Kagan, M.S. (1996). Filosofiya kultury [Philosophical culture]. Saint Petersburg: TOO TK «Petrapolis» Publ. (In Russ).
  3. Mescheryakov, B., & Zinchenko, V. (2003). Great psychological dictionary. Saint Petersburg: Praym-EVROZNAK Publ. (In Russ).
  4. Passov, E.I. (2015). Metodika kak nauka buduschego. Kratkaya versiya novoi koncepcii [Methodology as a science of the future. A short version of the new concept]. Saint Petersburg: Zlatoust Publ. (In Russ).
  5. Rozov, N.S. (1992). Filosofiya obrazovaniya: predmet, koncepciya, osnovnye temy i napravleniya izucheniya. Filosofiya obrazovaniya XXI veka [Philosophy of education: subject, concept, main themes and directions of study. Philosophy of Education of the XXI century]. Moscow. (In Russ).
  6. Shtoff, V.A. (1963). Rol modeley v poznanii [The role of models in cogni-tion]. Leningrad: Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta Publ. (In Russ).
  7. The newest philosophical dictionary. (2001). Mn.: Interpresservis; Knizhnyi Dom Publ. (In Russ).

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 246

PDF (Russian) - 1109

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2017 Passov E.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies