Basic theoretical approaches to the sociological definition of cultural codes

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article is devoted to the definitions of cultural codes introduced by the classics of sociology within their key theoretical concepts. The authors believe that automatic deduction of ‘cultural code’ interpretation from the concept ‘culture’ within any theoretical approach is not relevant to the rules of sociological knowledge, thus, they identify differences in the contexts that generate similar definitions of cultural codes. The authors analyze definitions of cultural codes in structural functionalism, neo-functionalism, structuralism, post-structuralism, post-marxism, structuralist constructivism and symbolic interactionism to show that the explanations of social reality and its relationships with culture through the notion of cultural codes imply fundamentally different descriptions of the system of social relations even within the same theoretical approach. The authors consider key works and positions of a number of classics of sociology and conclude that representatives of all major theoretical approaches tried to identify the concept ‘cultural codes’. However, while recognizing its significant potential, most theoretical approaches simply considered two or three elements of culture to be components of the cultural code without any reasoned explanation why all other elements of culture were excluded. Moreover, there are no uniform interpretations of cultural codes even within each of the above mentioned theoretical approaches.

About the authors

Yu I Yakovenko

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Author for correspondence.
Email: yakoven2007@rambler.ru

Chair of Sectoral Sociology

T L Bagaeva

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Email: tbahaeva@bsca.com.ua

Chair of Sectoral Sociology

A Yu Tashchenko

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Email: oven_anya@i.ua

Chair of Sectoral Sociology

References

  1. Aleksander Dzh.K. Analiticheskie debaty: Ponimanie otnositel'noi avtonomii kul'tury // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2007. T. 6. № 1.
  2. Bart R. Vvedenie v strukturnyi analiz povestvovatel'nykh tekstov // Zarubezhnaya estetika i teoriya literatury KhIKh-KhKh vv.: Traktaty, stat'i, esse. M.: MGU, 1987.
  3. Bart R. Kritika i istina // Zarubezhnaya estetika i teoriya literatury KhIKh-KhKh vv.: Traktaty, stat'i, esse. M.: MGU, 1987.
  4. Bart R. Sistema Mody. Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury. M.: Izdatel'stvo im. Sabashnikovykh, 2003.
  5. Bodriiyar Zh. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000.
  6. Bodriiyar Zh. Sistema veshchei. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Rudomino», 2001.
  7. Bukina N.V. K voprosu metodologii issledovaniya kul'turnykh kodov // Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 14.
  8. Burd'e P. Kodifikatsiya // Burd'e P. Nachala. 1994. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/ publicdoc/2009/2610.
  9. Burd'e P. Rynok simvolicheskoi produktsii // Voprosy sotsiologii. 1993. № 1/2.
  10. Gofman I. Analiz freimov: esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta / Pod red. G.S. Batygina i L.A. Kozlovoi. M.: IC RAN, 2003.
  11. Gofman I. Predstavlenie sebya drugim v povsednevnoi zhizni. M.: KANON-PRESS, 2000.
  12. Derrida Zh. Razlichanie // Derrida Zh. Pis'mo i razlichie. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2000.
  13. Derrida Zh. Universitet glazami ego pitomtsev // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2003. № 6.
  14. Erasov B.S. Sotsial'naya kul'turologiya. M.: Aspekt Press, 2000.
  15. Eres'ko M.N. Produkty sotsial'noi reprezentatsii kak indikatory innovatsionnykh protsessov // Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 8.
  16. Ionin L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury. M.: Izd. dom GU VShE, 2004.
  17. Istoriya teoreticheskoi sotsiologii. V 4 t. T. 3 / Otv. red. i sost. Yu.N. Davydov. M.: Kanon, 1997.
  18. Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. M.: GU-VShE, 2000.
  19. Kastel's M. Stanovlenie obshchestva setevykh struktur // Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya / Pod red. V.L. Inozemtseva. M., 1999.
  20. Kozhevnikov N.N. Postmodernizm. URL: http://st-yak. narod.ru/index9-15-1.html.
  21. Kravchenko S.A. Kul'tural'naya sotsiologiya Dzh. Aleksandera (genezis, ponyatiya, vozmozhnosti instrumentariya) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 5.
  22. Kul'turologiya Parsonsa. URL: http://ethnopsyhology.narod.ru/study/culture/parsons.htm.
  23. Levi-Stross K. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M.: TERRA-Knizhnyi klub; Respublika, 1999.
  24. Luman N. Real'nost' massmedia. M.: Praksis, 2005.
  25. Luman N. Chto takoe kommunikatsiya? // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1995. № 3.
  26. Nazarchuk A.V. Obshchestvo kak kommunikatsiya v trudakh Niklasa Lumana // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. № 2.
  27. Fedorov A.V. Umberto Eko i semioticheskaya teoriya mediaobrazovaniya // Slovar' sovremennoi kul'tury. Sotsiologiya. URL: http://culturolog.ru/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=602&Itemid=32.
  28. Filippov A. Diskursy o gosudarstve. Rasshifrovka lektsii 3 dekabrya 2009 g. URL: http://polit.ru/article/2009/12/17/discours.
  29. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994.
  30. Fuko M.P. // Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Pod red. A.A. Ivina. M.: Gardariki. 2004.
  31. Khlebnikova O.V. Semioticheskie kody v filosofskom tekste. URL: http://www.omsk.edu/ article/vestnik-omgpu-11.pdf.
  32. Eko U. K semioticheskomu analizu televizionnogo soobshcheniya / Sokrashch. per. s angl. A.A. Deryabina, 1998. URL: http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/eco.htm.
  33. Eko U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu. SPb.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998.

Copyright (c) 2015 Yu I Yakovenko, T L Bagaeva, A Yu Tashchenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies