Russian university bureaucracy - terra incognita for sociology of education

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The authors argue that in contemporary Russian universities, the bureaucracy has turned into the most influential corporation, and insist on the sociological analysis of its status, positive and negative consequences of formation and evolution. Despite many studies of this phenomenon, the university bureaucracy remains terra incognita for sociology of education - many fundamental issues remain unclear: why in the meritocratic and initially humanitarian university, practices of formal rationality with the focus on normative acts and instructions (rationality for its own sake) prevail; how to explain that even the obvious inconsistency of many bureaucratic practices does not lead to discrediting the bureaucratic system, but, on the contrary, contributes to its extended reproduction; why many specialists find the results of the university management optimization based on a bureaucratic approach doubtful. The majority of sociological works on the university bureaucratization provide answers to these questions in the form of admitting the current situation, but there is no causal analysis of the university bureaucracy development and evolution. The article considers possible causes of the current situation: the lack of a systematic approach to the university bureaucratization, its study mainly in the context of the higher education reforms; uncritical reproduction of the classical theories of bureaucracy, which need changes according to the contemporary realities; the lack of works on the status of the university bureaucracy under the digital transformation of society; the barrier of institutionalized hypocrisy; servility relationships between sociologists and university managers. The identified problems require empirical verification and discussion in the professional sociological community.

About the authors

V. P. Babintsev

Belgorod State National Research University

Author for correspondence.
Email: babintsev@bsu.edu.ru
Pobedy St., 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russia

G. N. Gaidukova

Belgorod State National Research University

Email: g_gaidukova@bsu.edu.ru
Pobedy St., 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russia

Zh. A. Shapoval

Belgorod State National Research University

Email: shapoval@bsu.edu.ru
Pobedy St., 85, Belgorod, 308015, Russia

References

  1. Abramov R., Gruzdev I., Terentiev E. Trevoga i entuziazm v diskursah ob akademi-cheskom mire: mezhdunarodny i rossiysky konteksty [Anxiety and enthusiasm in discourses on the academic world: International and Russian contexts]. NLO. 2016; 2. (In Russ.).
  2. Afanasieva V. Katastrofa rossiyskogo obrazovaniya [The catastrophe of the Russian education]. URL: https://philologist.livejournal.com/9815654.html. (In Russ.).
  3. Babura L.A. Kross-mediaprodukt [Cross-media-product]. Vektor Ekonomiki. 2017; 6. (In Russ.).
  4. Budaev V.D. Razmyshleniya o sostoyanii vysshego obrazovaniya v sovremennoy Rossii [Reflections on the state of the higher education in contemporary Russia]. Vysshee Obrazovanie Segodnya. 2018; 7. (In Russ.).
  5. Bourdieu P. O gosudarstve: kurs lektsiy v Kollezh de Frans (1989–1992) [On the State: Lectures at the College de France. 1989–1992]. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).
  6. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow; 1990. (In Russ.).
  7. Drugova E.A., Pleshkevich I.B., Klimova T.V. Transformatsiya kadrovoy politiki rossiyskih universitetov-uchastnikov Proekta 5–100: keys NIYaU MIFI [Transformation of the personnel policy of Russian universities participating in the Project 5–100: The case of the NRNU MEPhI. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2021; 30 (6). (In Russ.).
  8. Dudina V.I. Sotsiologicheskoe znanie v kontekste razvitiya informatsionnyh tekhnologiy [Sociological knowledge under the development of information technologies]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2015; 6. (In Russ.).
  9. Zarubina N.N. Teoriya ratsionalizatsii Maksa Webera kak metodologiya ponimaniya sovremennyh sotsiokulturnyh protsessov [Max Weber’s theory of rationalization as a methodology for understanding modern social-cultural processes]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia. 2020; 6. (In Russ.).
  10. Zborovsky A.G. Doverie v universitete i universitetsky kapital [Trust in the university and university capital]. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsialnom razvitii regionov. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
  11. Zinchenko G.P. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba v predmetnom pole sotsiologii [Public service in the disciplinary field of sociology]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 2. (In Russ.).
  12. Eagleton T. Medlennaya smert universiteta [The slow death of the university]. Alma Mater. 2016; 2. (In Russ.).
  13. Kapoguzov E.A. Institutsionalnaya struktura proizvodstva gosudarstvennyh uslug: ot weberianskoj byurokratii — k sovremennym reformam gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [The Institutional Structure of Public Services: From the Weberian Bureaucracy to Contemporary Reforms of Public Administration]. Omsk; 2012. (In Russ.).
  14. Knelts I.A, Duminskaya M.V. Fenomen grazhdanskogo obshchestva v kontseptualnyh predstavleniyah zapadnoy filosofii [The phenomenon of civil society in the conceptual representations of the Western philosophy]. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsialnom razvitii regionov. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.).
  15. Konstantinovsky D.L., Ovsyannikov A.A., Pokrovsky N.E. Sovershenstvovanie sotsiologicheskogo obrazovaniya. Analitichesky doklad [Improving the Sociological Education. Analytical Report]. Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.).
  16. Krasinskaya L.F. Modernizatsiya, optimizatsiya, byurokratizatsiya. Chto ozhidaet vysshuyu shkolu zavtra? [Modernization, optimization, bureaucratization. What awaits the higher school tomorrow?]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016; 3. (In Russ.).
  17. Krasnova G.N, Peftiev V.I. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii: problemy i resheniya [Higher education in Russia: Problems and solutions]. Sotsialno-Politicheskie Issledovaniya. 2019; 3 (4). (In Russ.).
  18. Kurbatova M.V. Reforma vysshego obrazovaniya kak institutsionalny proekt rossiyskoy byurokratii: soderzhanie i posledstviya [The higher education reform as an institutional project of the Russian bureaucracy: Content and consequences]. Mir Rossii. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  19. Lebedeva L.G. Mezhpokolencheskiye razryvy i riski v virtual’nom prostranstveIntergenerational gaps and risks in the virtual space. Vestnik SGSEU. 2018;1(70). (In Russ.).
  20. Lisenkova A.A. Vyzovy i vozmozhnosti tsifrovoy epokhi: sotsiokulturny aspekt [Challenges and opportunities of the digital era: A social-cultural aspect]. Rossiysky Gumanitarny Zhurnal. 2018; 7 (3). (In Russ.).
  21. Minina V.N. Tsifrovizatsiya vysshego obrazovaniya i ee sotsialnye rezultaty [Digitalization of the higher education and its social results]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. 2020; 13 (1). (In Russ.).
  22. Osipov A.M. Byuropatologii v sovremennom rossiyskom obrazovanii [Bureaupathology in the contemporary Russian education]. Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsialnom razvitii regionov. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ).
  23. Osipov A.M. Byuropatologiya i bumazhny pressing v rossiyskom obrazovanii [Bureaupathology and paper pressing in the Russian education]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2020; 20 (4). (In Russ.).
  24. Perederiy V.A. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie problemy selskogo prekariata (rezultaty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya v Krasnodarskom krae) [Social-economic problems of the rural precariat (results of the sociological study in the Krasnodar Region). Sotsiologiya i obshchestvo: traditsii i innovatsii v sotsialnom razvitii regionov. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ).
  25. Ritzer G. Sovremennye sotsiologicheskie teorii [Modern Sociological Theory]. Saint Petersburg; 2002. (In Russ.).
  26. Rozov N.S. Preodolet stagnatsiyu universitetskogo obrazovaniya: ot byurokraticheskogo kontrolya — k konkurentsii kachestva [To overcome the stagnation of the university education: From bureaucratic control to quality competition]. Alma Mater. 2017; 9. (In Russ.).
  27. Sibirev V.V. Vliyanie tsifrovyh tekhnologiy na model gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [The influence of digital technologies on the model of public administration]. Tsifrovoe obshchestvo — novy format sotsialnoj realnosti: struktury, protsessy i tendentsii razvitiya. N.G. Skvortsov, Yu.V. Asochakov (Eds.). Saint Petersburg; 2020. (In Russ.).
  28. Sliva A.V., Berezovsky V.A., Fokina V.N., Basov V.A. Finansovye i intellektualnye poteri vuza vsledstvie izlishney byurokratizatsii v sisteme obrazovaniya [Financial and intellectual losses of the university due to excessive bureaucratization of the education system]. Ekonomika Obrazovaniya. 2015; 5. (In Russ.).
  29. Taleb N.N. Riskuya sobstvennoy shkuroy: Skrytaya asimmetriya povsednevnoy zhizni [Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life]. Moscow; 2018. (In Russ.).
  30. Tambovtsev V., Rozhdestvenskaya I. Reforma vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii: mezhdunarodny opyt i ekonomicheskaya teoriya [The reform of higher education in Russia: International experience and economic theory]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014; 5. (In Russ.).
  31. Tuzikov A.R. Vysshee obrazovanie: ideologemy reform i praktika imitatsiy [Higher education: Ideologies of reforms and practice of imitations]. Upravlenie Ustojchivym Razvitiem. 2020; 1. (In Russ.).
  32. Tkhagapsoev Kh.B., Sapunov M.B. Rossiyskaya obrazovatelnaya realnost i ee prevrashchennye formy [Russian educational reality and its transformed forms]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016; 6. (In Russ.).
  33. Shabrova N.V. Doverie i byurokratizatsiya v vuzah [Trust and bureaucratization in universities]. Vestnik SurGPU. 2019; 5. (In Russ.).
  34. Shvetsov Yu.G. Slozhivshayasya sistema upravleniya obrazovaniyem — tyazhkaya obuza dlya uchebnyh zavedeniy [The existing education management system is a heavy burden for educational institutions]. Vysshee Obrazovanie Segodnya. 2017; 9. (In Russ.).
  35. Yanitsky O.N. K probleme modernizatsii gumanitarnogo znaniya [On the modernization of humanitarian knowledge]. Sotsiologicheskaya Nauka i Sotsialnaya Praktika. 2018; 6 (1). (In Russ.).
  36. Bennett J.T., Johnson M.H. Paperwork and bureaucracy. Economic Inquiry. 1979; 17 (3).
  37. Entzioni A. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers. New York; 1969.
  38. Etzioni A. Modern Organizations. New Jersey; 1964.
  39. Fitzgerald T. The tyranny of bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2009; 37 (1).
  40. Humes W. The ‘iron cage’ of educational bureaucracy. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2021. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2021.1899129.
  41. Lumby J. Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 2017; 47 (10).
  42. Saks M.M., Adams T.L. Neo-Weberianism, professional formation and the state: Inside the black box. Professions and Professionalism. 2019; 9 (2).
  43. Spector H. Bureaucratization, education and the meanings of responsibility. Curriculum Inquiry. 2018; 48 (5).

Copyright (c) 2022 Babintsev V.P., Gaidukova G.N., Shapoval Z.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies