Social functions of rural farmers (on the example of the Altai Region)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article focuses on the social functions of rural farmers. The significance of this perspective is determined by the possibilities of revaluating social processes in the contemporary Russian countryside. Features of rural life predetermine various options for rural farmers to support villagers. The article aims at identifying those social groups and communities that can take an active part in everyday rural life, thus, changing the value system of the village and affecting the consequences of alienation and disunity. The theoretical analysis allowed the author to define rural farmers are a social-professional group with specific value priorities which lead to its active participation in the life of rural society. Such an involvement in solving the problems of rural settlements is of both social-economic and moral nature (help, support, responsibility). The article considers the heuristic potential of the concept ‘social function’ in assessing the role of farmers in the daily life of Russian villages. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with farmers in the Altai Region - to identify the key social functions associated with the activities of the representatives of this social-professional group. The author interviewed 66 male farmers of different age to assess their actions for consolidating the villagers, supporting people in difficult life situations, and expanding cooperation with the local government to solve the most important tasks of rural settlements. Based on the empirical data, the author identifies a number of social functions of farmers, which explain the features and directions of their activities in the development of Russian villages.

About the authors

E. A. Popov

Altai State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: popov.eug@yandex.ru

доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры социологии и конфликтологии

Dimitrova St., 66, Barnaul, 656049, Russia

References

  1. Anisimov R.I. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya transformatsiya smysla zhiznennogo mira rossijskih krestiyan [Social-economic transformation of the life-world meaning for the Russian peasants]. Smysly selskoj zhizni (Opyt sociologicheskogo analiza). Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  2. Bessokirnaya G.P. Proiskhodit li “razlozhenie krestyanstva” v reformiruyushchejsya Rossii? [Is there a “decomposition of the peasantry” in reforming Russia?]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2014; 6. (In Russ.).
  3. Bokontaeva D.K. Fermery kak sotsialno-professionalnaya gruppa [Farmers as a socialprofessional group]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 1998; 3. (In Russ.).
  4. Bondarenko L.V. Razvitie selskih territorij Rossii: otsenki, mneniya, ozhidaniya [Development of the Russian rural areas: Estimates, opinions, expectations]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 3. (In Russ.).
  5. Buzdalov I.N. Razvitie selskih territorij Rossii: Unizhenny klass: o sotsialnom statuse i ekonomicheskom polozhenii rossijskogo krestyanstva [Humiliated class: The social status and economic situation of the Russian peasantry]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2011; 4. (In Russ.).
  6. Veliky P.P. Smysly duhovnoj zhizni selskih zhitelej [The meanings of the spiritual life of rural residents]. Smysly selskoy zhizni (Opyt sotsiologicheskogo analiza). Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.).
  7. Veliky P.P. Khozyaeva selskih podvorij: differentsiatsiya, problemy, budushchee [Owners of rural farmsteads: Differentiation, problems, future]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2019; 12. (In Russ.).
  8. Veliky P.P., Bocharova E.V. Raskrestyanivanie kak indikator destruktivnoj transformatsii rossijskoj agrosfery [Depeasantization as an indicator of the destructive transformation of the Russian agrarian sphere]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2012; 1. (In Russ.).
  9. Vinogradsky V.G. Krestyansky mir v diskurse pokolencheskoj pechali [Peasant world in the discourse of generational sadness]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2015; 12. (In Russ.).
  10. Zhvitiashvili A.S. Institutsionalnaya dinamika rossijskogo sela: istoriko-sotsiologichesky vzglyad [Institutional dynamics of the Russian village: A historical-sociological approach]. Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii. 2011; 3. (In Russ.).
  11. Kalugina Z.I., Fadeeva O.P. Novaya paradigma selskogo razvitiya [A new paradigm of rural development]. Mir Rossii. 2009; 2. (In Russ.).
  12. Kislitsyna О.A. Natsionalny indeks kachestva zhizni (blagopoluchiya) kak instrument monitoringa effektivnosti sotsialno-ekonomicheskoj politiki v Rossii [National index of life quality (well-being) as a means for monitoring the effectiveness of the social-economic policy in Russia]. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Sotsialnoy Politiki. 2017; 15 (4). (In Russ.).
  13. Konev Yu.M., Belonozhko M.L., Barbakov O.M. Sotsialnye nastroeniya selskih zhitelej yuga Tyumenskoj oblasti [Social mood of rural residents in the south of the Tyumen Region]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2016; 3. (In Russ.).
  14. Kuzmin S.A. O transformatsii derevenskogo uklada i sudbah selskohozyajstvennogo proizvodstva v Rossii [On the transformation of the rural way of life and the fate of agricultural production in Russia]. Mir Rossii. 2007; 1. (In Russ.).
  15. Mareeva S.V. Neravenstvo zhiznennyh shansov rossiyan v sfere balansa zhizni i truda [Inequality of the Russians’ life chances in the life-work balance]. Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2019; 3. (In Russ.).
  16. Mareeva S.V. Uroven i kachestvo zhizni [Level and quality of life]. Rossiyskoe obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Book 5. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  17. Mersiyanova I.V. Instituty samoorganizatsii po mestu zhitelstva i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya [Institutions of self-organization at the place of residence and the quality of life]. Zhurnal Issledovaniy Sotsialnoy Politiki. 2010; 7 (4). (In Russ.).
  18. Mirsky F. Agrarian Policy and Mechanisms for the Formation of Values of Workers Engaged in Agriculture. Chicago; 2008.
  19. Mukhanova M.N. Zanyatost selskogo naseleniya Rossii v neformalnom sektore [Employment of the rural population of Russia in the informal sector]. Rossiya i Sovremenny Mir. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  20. Mukhanova M.N. Zanyatost selyan v neformalnom sektore na rynke truda APK [Employment of villagers in the informal sector of the labor market in the agrarian-industrial complex]. Rossiyskoe krestyanstvo i selskoye khozyaystvo v kontekste regionalnoy istorii. Yoshkar-Ola; 2018. (In Russ.).
  21. Mukhanova M.N. Obzor metodologicheskih podhodov k analizu transformatsii agrarnogo rynka truda v sovremennoj Rossii [Review of methodological approaches to the analysis of the transformation of the agrarian labor market in contemporary Russia]. Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii. 2021; 36 (In Russ.).
  22. Mukhanova M.N., Zhvitiashvili A.S., Bessokirnaya G.P. Rossiyskoe selo: sotsialnostrukturnye protsessy ot proshlogo k nastoyashchemu [Russian Village: Social-Structural Processes from the Past to the Present]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).
  23. Osvald I. Industrializirovannaya derevnya. K transformatsii selskogo obraza zhizni v postsocialisticheskih obshchestvah [An industrialized village. On the transformation of the rural lifestyle in post-socialist societies]. Vdali ot gorodov. Zhizn postsovetskoy derevni. Saint Petersburg; 2013. (In Russ.).
  24. Skalnaya M.M., Tarasov N.G., Kozlov M.P., Eryukova I.D. Sotsialno-ekonomichesky portret fermera [Social-economic portrait of the farmer]. Nikonovskie chteniya. Moscow; 2013. (In Russ.).
  25. Titarenko L.G. Sotsialnaya funktsiya [Social function]. URL: http://sociology.niv.ru/doc/encyclopedia/sociological/articles/203/socialnaya-funkciya.htm. (In Russ.)
  26. Tikhonova N.E. Udovletvorennost rossiyan zhiznyu: dinamika i faktory [Satisfaction of Russians with life: Dynamics and factors]. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost. 2015; 3. (In Russ.).
  27. Tokarskaya N.M., Marasanova A.A. O kachestve zhizni naseleniya Irkutska [On the quality of life of the population of Irkutsk]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2015; 6. (In Russ.).
  28. Toshchenko Z.T. Osobennosti zhiznennogo mira selskih zhitelej Rossii [Features of the life world of rural residents in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2018; 2. (In Russ.).
  29. Tuluzakova M.V. Strategiya formirovaniya solidarnogo obshchestva: praktika, sotsialnye riski i perspektivy [Strategy for developing a solidary society: Practice, social risks and prospects]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2014; 14 (2). (In Russ.).
  30. Khagurov A.A. Struktura selskogo rasseleniya. Tendentsii i problemy razvitiya [Structure of rural settlement. Trends and problems of development]. Vestnik Instituta Sotsiologii. 2011; 3. (In Russ.).
  31. Chirikova A.E. Sotsialnaya otvetstvennost biznesa: dolzhnik, blagodetel, partner [Social responsibility of business: Debtor, benefactor, partner]. Nauka i Obrazovanie: Khozyajstvo i Ekonomika; Predprinimatelstvo; Pravo i Upravlenie. 2016; 4. (In Russ.).
  32. Efendiev A.G., Gogoleva A.S., Balabanova E.S. Tendentsii duhovno-nravstvennogo razvitiya zhitelej sel Belgorodskoj oblasti (opyt institutsionalnogo analiza) [Trends in the spiritualmoral development of the villagers in the Belgorod Region (an institutional analysis)]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2017; 12. (In Russ.).
  33. Köpfer J. Neue Möglichkeiten für die soziale Verantwortung des Geschäfts im Agrarsektor der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung des Auslands. Berlin; 2002.
  34. Meckford T. Social Characteristics of the Most Relevant Social Transformations in the Conditions of Post-Capitalism. New York; 2001.
  35. Prassman O., Vikkenti I. Village Life and the Image of a Villager: Integration, Quarrels, Business and Projects. San Francisco; 2011.

Copyright (c) 2022 Popov E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies