Prospects for the promotion of Russian universities in the international academic ranking ARWU

Abstract

The article considers the methodology for assessing higher education institutions and prospects for their promotion in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). The authors explain the focus of their research by the latest trends in the development of higher education in Russia and in the world; thus, universities positions in international ranking systems become an extremely important parameter for their evaluation. International ranking systems allow to evaluate the whole analytical information according to the criteria in one source, and to assess the competitiveness of the data in comparison with other evaluated organizations in the field. Often a potential student faces difficulty in collecting and evaluating information about the university he is interested in, because it hides its weaknesses, does not provide all information in the open form, or publishes information in various sources that are not easy to find for a person outside the academic community. The article aims at identifying and systematizing the features of the methodology for assessment universities in the ARWU, and at assessing its applicability for the subjects of the Russian higher education. The authors used content analysis and comparative analysis to examine the specifics of the ARWU assessing system according to the criteria provided by experts, and to consider the criticism of this ranking system. The authors identified and analyzed both positive and negative trends in the development of the ARWU methodology; examined the subject rankings of the ARWU system and compared their methodology. The article presents the results of the ARWU for 2021 focusing on the Russian universities, their prospects and difficulties.

About the authors

Yu. N. Ebzeeva

RUDN University

Email: ebzeeva_yun@pfur.ru

кандидат филологических наук, заведующая кафедрой иностранных языков филологического факультета, первый проректор - проректор по образовательной деятельности

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

L. N. Gishkaeva

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: gishkaeva_ln@pfur.ru

кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры иностранных языков филологического факультета

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Irkhin Yu.V. Mirovye reytingi universitetov kak upravlenchesky faktor sistem vysshego obrazovaniya [University rankings as a management factor in the higher education system]. ARS ADMINISTRANDI. 2013; 1. (In Russ.).
  2. Kincharova A.V. Upravlenie reputatsiey vuza. Metodologiya mirovyh reytingov: analiz i Kritika [University reputation management. Methodology of world rankings: analysis and criticism]. Universitetskoe Upravlenie: Praktika i Analiz. 2014; 3. (In Russ.).
  3. Konstantinova A.V. Universitety v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya: strategii i perspektivy razvitiya v sovremennoy Rossii [Universities in the Higher Education System: Strategies and Prospects for the Development in Contemporary Russia]. Diss. k.s.n. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
  4. Trotsuk I.V. Reyting vuzov: Ideologiya i metodologiya sostavleniya “Tablits lig” (zarubezhnaya praktika) [Universities ranking: Ideology and methodology of compiling “Tables of Leagues” (foreign practice)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2008; 1. (In Russ.).
  5. ARWU. URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html#.
  6. ARWU: Methodology. URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2020. html.
  7. ARWU: Award Factor. URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_ Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2015.html.
  8. ARWU: Subject Rankings. URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com/Shanghairanking-SubjectRankings/index.html.
  9. ARWU: Methodology of Subject Rankings. URL: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWUFIELD-Methodology-2016.html.
  10. Salmi D., Frumin I.D. Kak gosudarstva dobivayutsya mezhdunarodnoy konkurentosposobnosti dlya universitetov: uroki dlya Rossii [How the states achieve international competitiveness for universities: Lessons for Russia]. Voprosy Obrazovaniya. 2013; 1. (In Russ.).
  11. Billaut J.-C., Bouyssou D., Vincke P. Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? Scientometrics. 2010; 84 (1).
  12. Docampo D. On the internal dynamics of the Shanghai Ranking. Scientometrics. 2014; 98.
  13. Gérand C. “Aix-Marseille, laboratoire de la fusion des universités”. URL: www.mondediplomatique.fr.
  14. Liu N.C., Cheng Y. Academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe. 2005; 30 (2).
  15. Van Raan A.F.J. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics. 2005; 62 (1).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Ebzeeva Y.N., Gishkaeva L.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies