Features of the contemporary settlement system on the Crimean Peninsula

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

In the 20th century, humanity finally chose the urban path of development as a priority. In the 21st century, the state strategic plans focus on large cities and urban agglomerations under the continuing urbanization. Rural territories are increasingly perceived by the authorities and urbanists as some dying forms, sacrificed for the development of cities. In the Russian Federation, this is especially true for a number of regions (Moscow Region, Sverdlovsk Region, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, etc.), in which municipalities are turned into urban districts, and all administrative functions are transferred to the cities. The countryside is still rural, but its population is practically removed from decision-making. At the same time, there are reverse migrations - of urban dwellers to the countryside, which leads to further expansion of cities. The term ‘settlement system’ means a set of settlements located in a certain territory and connected by a common organization of management, services and labor market. Therefore, the Crimean region has both - overpopulated rural areas and developing cities. The article considers the settlement system of the Crimean Peninsula, in particular its urban part, as a basis of its demographic development. Based on statistical, cartographic, regional and historical approaches, the author considers the dynamics of urban settlement and such a phenomenon as urban agglomerations; identifies the main factors in the development of urban settlements, the subsystems of the urban settlement system and its central places. The article also describes the Simferopol-Sevastopol dual-core agglomeration which seems to break up into two autonomous agglomerations due to a range of factors.

About the authors

T. Y. Gusakov

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Author for correspondence.
Email: gusakov-ty@ranepa.ru

младший научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; аспирант кафедры экономической и социальной географии России Московского государственного университета им. М.В. Ломоносова

Prosp. Vernadskogo, 82, Moscow, 119571, Russia

References

  1. Antonov E.V. Gorodskie aglomeratsii: podkhody k vydeleniyu i delimitatsii [Urban agglomerations: Approaches to identification and delimitation]. Kontury Globalnyh Transformatsiy: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo. 2020; 13 (1). (In Russ.).
  2. Baiburtsky A.M., Timirgazin A.D. K voprosu o lokalizatsii srednevekovogo armyanskogo goroda Kazarat v Krymu [On the localization of the medieval Armenian city of Kazarat in the Crimea]. Istoriko-Filologichesky Zhurnal. 2001; 3. (In Russ.).
  3. Baransky N.N. Ob ekonomiko-geograficheskom izuchenii gorodov [On the economic-geographical study of cities]. Ekonomicheskaya Geografiya. Ekonomicheskaja Kartografija. Moscow; 1956. (In Russ.).
  4. Bashirov V.R. Osobennosti kartografirovaniya razlichnykh tipov lokalnykh sistem rasseleniya (na primere Moskovskoy oblasti i Kryma) [Features of mapping different types of local settlement systems (on the example of the Moscow Region and Crimea)]. Izvestiya Vuzov. Geodeziya i Aerofotosiemka. 2015; 4. (In Russ.).
  5. Boze E. Gorodskaya aglomeratsiya: staroe nazvanie — novoe soderzhanie [Urban agglomeration: Old name — new content]. Rossiyskoe Ekspertnoe Obozrenie. 2007; 4–5. (In Russ.).
  6. Vlasti Kryma brosili vse sily na reshenie ekologicheskoj problemy Armyanska [The Crimean authorities threw all their strength on solving the ecological problem of Armyansk]. URL: https://www.vesti.ru/article/1433267. (In Russ.).
  7. Vodarsky Ya.E., Eliseeva O.I., Kabuzan V.M. Naselenie Kryma v kontse XVII — kontse XX veka: chislennost, razmeshhenie, etnichesky sostav [Population of Crimea in the late 17th — late 20th Century: Size, Settlement, Ethnic Composition]. Moscow; 2003. (In Russ.).
  8. Voytekhovsky D.V. Evoljutsiya i sovremennye transformatsii v sisteme rasseleniya Krymskogo rekreatsionnogo rayona [Evolution and contemporary transformations in the settlement system of the Crimean recreational area]: diss. k.g.n. Simferopol; 2021. (In Russ.).
  9. Gusakov T.Yu. Migratsii naseleniya kak osnovnoy faktor transformatsii sistemy rasseleniya Krymskogo poluostrova [Migrations as the main factor in the transformation of the settlement system of the Crimean Peninsula]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2021; 6 (2). (In Russ.).
  10. Gusakov T. Selskaya neformalnaya ekonomika krymskogo sela Novoalekseevka [Rural informal economy of the Crimean village Novoalekseevka]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (4). (In Russ.).
  11. Zakon goroda Sevastopolya ot 23.07.2019 No. 518-ZS “O vnesenii izmeneniy v Zakon goroda Sevastopolya ot 03.06.2014 g. No. 19-ZS ‘Ob administrativno-territorialnom ustroystve goroda Sevastopolya’” [Law of Sevastopol of July 23, 2019, No. 518-ZS “Amendments to the Law of the City of Sevastopol of June 3, 2014, No. 19-ZS ‘On the Administrative-Territorial Structure of the City of Sevastopol’”]. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/9200201907240006?index=1&rangeSize=1. (In Russ.).
  12. Kerch nazvali samym drevnim gorodom Rossii [Kerch was named the oldest city in Russia]. URL: https://rg.ru/2017/01/31/reg-ufo/kerch-nazvali-samym-drevnim-gorodom-rossii.html. (In Russ.).
  13. Kuznetsov M.M. Formirovanie sistemy rasseleniya Kryma pod vliyaniem transportnogo faktora [Development of the settlement system of Crimea under the influence of the transportation factor]. Uchyonye Zapiski TNU im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya: Geografiya. 2004; 17 (4). (In Russ.).
  14. Lappo G.M. Goroda Rossii. Vzglyad geografa [Cities of Russia. Geographer’s Perception]. Moscow; 2012. (In Russ.).
  15. Lappo G.M. Razvitie gorodskih aglomeratsii v SSSR [Development of Urban Agglomerations in the USSR]. Moscow; 1978. (In Russ.).
  16. Lappo G.M., Polyan P.M., Selivanova T.I. Gorodskie aglomeratsii Rossii [Urban agglomerations of Russia]. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2010/0407/tema01.php#_ FNR_3. (In Russ.).
  17. Leizerovich E.E. Ekonomicheskie mikrorayony Rossii (setka i tipologiya) [Economic Micro-Districts of Russia (Grid and Typology)]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
  18. Maergoyz I.M. Metodika melkomasshtabnyh ekonomiko-geograficheskih issledovaniy [Methodology of Small-Scale Economic-Geographical Research]. Moscow; 1981. (In Russ.).
  19. Pasik Ya. Evreyskie naselennye punkty v Krymu do 1941 g. [Jewish settlements in Crimea before 1941]. URL: http://evkol.ucoz.com/crimea_settlements.htm. (In Russ.).
  20. Polyan P.M. Metodika vydeleniya i analiza opornogo karkasa rasseleniya [Methods for Identification and Analysis of the Settlement Basis]. Moscow; 1988. (In Russ.).
  21. Polyan P.M. Territorialnye struktury — urbanizatsiya — rasselenie. Teoreticheskie podkhody i metody izucheniya [Territorial Structures — Urbanization — Settlement. Theoretical Approaches and Methods of Study]. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ.).
  22. Polyan P.M., Zaslavsky I.N., Neimark N.I. Problemy delimitatsii gorodskih aglomeratsiy: sravnenie i sintez vedushhih metodik [Issues of delimitation of urban agglomerations: A comparison and synthesis of leading techniques]. Problemy territorialnoy organizatsii prostranstva i rasseleniya v urbanizirovannykh rayonah. Sverdlovsk; 1988. (In Russ.).
  23. Prokhorova E.A., Kazarin Ya.O., Furshtakov I.A. Kartografirovanie sistemy rasseleniya poluostrova Krym pod vliyaniem transportnogo faktora [Mapping the settlement system of the Crimean Peninsula under the influence of the transportation factor]. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii “InterKarto. InterGIS”. 2017; 23. (In Russ.).
  24. Raysikh A.E. Opredelenie granits gorodskih aglomeratsiy Rossii: sozdanie modeli i rezultaty [Identifying the boundaries of urban agglomerations in Russia: A model and its results]. Demograficheskoe Obozrenie. 2020; 7 (2). (In Russ.).
  25. Rasselenie v prigorodnyh zonah [Settlement in suburban areas]. Voprosy geografii. Vol. 87: Rasselenie v prigorodnyh zonah. Moscow; 1971. (In Russ.).
  26. Smirnyagin L.V. Sistema rasseleniya Rossii: tendentsii k peremenam [Russian settlement system: Trends of change]. Gorodskoy Almanakh. 2009; 4. (In Russ.).
  27. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: ponyatiya i terminy [Social-Economic Geography: Concepts and Terms]. Otv. red. A.P. Gorkin. Smolensk; 2013. (In Russ.).
  28. Starchenko R.A. Dinamika chislennosti i rasseleniya russkikh Kryma v XVIII–XIX vekah [Dynamics of the number and settlements of Russians in Crimea in the 18th — 19th century]. Vestnik KGU. 2013; 6. (In Russ.).
  29. Strategiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipalnogo obrazovaniya gorodskoy okrug Simferopol Respubliki Krym na period do 2030 goda [Strategy of the Social-Economic Development of the Municipality of the City District of Simferopol of the Republic of Crimea until 2030]. URL: http://simadm.ru/media/acts/2017/08/25/_Strategija_25.08.2017__final.pdf. (In Russ.).
  30. Stroitelstvo zheleznodorzhnyh putey dlya gorodskoy elektrichki v Sevastopole nachnut v 2022 godu [The construction of railways for the city train in Sevastopol will begin in 2022]. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/12028555. (In Russ.).
  31. Tkachenko A.A. Ponyatie o sistemakh i tsentrakh rasseleniya: novy vzglyad [The concept of systems and centers of settlement: A new approach]. Prostranstvennaja organizatsija obshhestva: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. Pod red. T.V. Subbotinoy, L.B. Chupinoy. Perm; 2018. (In Russ.).
  32. Trotsuk I.V. “…Poiski luchshego mira dolzhny opiratsya na doskonalnoe znanie geo-grafii…” [“…The search for a better world must be based on a thorough knowledge of geography”]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (1). (In Russ.).
  33. Trotsuk I.V. Sotsialnye aspekty rossiyskoy geografii: novy vitok nablyudeniy za transformatsiyami mezhstolichnogo prostranstva [Social aspects of Russian geography: A new round of the studies of the space transformations between two Russian capitals]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2016; 16 (4). (In Russ.).
  34. Chuchkalov A.S., Alekseev A.I. Novye selskie naselennye punkty — byvshie posyolki gorodskogo tipa [New rural settlements — former urban-type settlements]. Izvestija RAN. Seriya: Geograficheskaya. 2019; 6. (In Russ.).
  35. Shvets A.B., Volkhin D.A. Ischezayushhie sela Krymskogo poluostrova kak fragment v izuchenii “Inogo Kryma” [Disappearing villages of the Crimean Peninsula as a part of the study of ‘Other Crimea’]. Geopolitika i Ekogeodinamika Regionov. 2020; 6 (3). (In Russ.).
  36. Shevchuk A.G., Shvets A.B. Politiko-geografichesky faktor evoljutsii krymskoj sistemy rasselenija v XX — nachale XXI vv. [Political-geographical factor in the evolution of the Crimean settlement system in the 20th — early 21st century]. Geopolitika i Ekogeodinamika Regionov. 2010; 1. (In Russ.).
  37. Yakovenko I.M. Analiz i kartografirovanie mnogoletnej dinamiki selskogo rasselenija v Krymu [Analysis and mapping of the long-term dynamics of the rural settlement system in Crimea]. Geopolitika i Ekogeodinamika Regionov. 2020; 6 (3). (In Russ.).
  38. Yakovenko I.M. Kontseptsiya ustoychivogo razvitiya sistemy rasseleniya Krymskogo rekreatsionnogo rayona [The concept of sustainable development of the settlement system of the Crimean recreational area]. Geopolitika i Ekogeodinamika Regionov. 2019; 5 (4). (In Russ.).
  39. Nikulin A., Trotsuk I. Pitirim Sorokin ’s contribution to rural sociology: Russian, European and American milestones of a scientific career. Journal of Peasant Studies. 2018; 45 (7).
  40. Wegren S., Nikulin A., Trotsuk I. Russian agriculture during Putin’s fourth term: A SWOT analysis. Post-Communist Economies. 2019; 31 (4).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Gusakov T.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies