Eurasianism and geopolitics: Social mythologemes of space


The article considers the origins of Eurasianism as a Russian social doctrine that emerged as an answer to the Western geopolitical concepts, in particular of the Anglo-Saxon and German geopolitical schools. Both concepts serve to justify social institutions and associations based on the difference between the spaces of the Eastern and Western parts of Eurasia. The authors argue that geopolitics of both the Western-European and Eastern-European types is based on mythologemes which claim to be of scientific importance but are not capable of achieving this status. The article shows that both theories claim (1) the invention of an ideal timeless homeland of society on the basis of a mythological interpretation of space; (2) possession of sacred knowledge (through the sacralization of space) which is actually profane. The key difference between Western geopolitical schools (Anglo-Saxon and German) and Eurasianism is the proposed connection between space and a specific society. Geopolitics proceeds from the constant spatial opposition as a factor of social-political competition. The geopolitical assessment of reality is based on the need to attack the ‘alien’ space due to its initial, ‘natural’ hostility. The geopolitical hostility and even aggressiveness contradicts the defensive nature of Eurasianism which declares that space unites peoples with similar values; therefore, their societies should defend their ‘space of development’ from the encroachments of the Western countries. Thus, Atlanticism as a global project of the contemporary Western geopolitics fundamentally contradicts Eurasianism which does not accept hegemonism and supports the principle of a multipolar world; today, the level of conflict between these projects is not high, although there are no prospects for this conflict resolution.

About the authors

K. V. Radkevich

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.

кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры социологии

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

A. V. Shabaga

RUDN University


доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры теории и истории международных отношений

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia


  1. Vernadsky V. Nauchnaya mysl kak planetnoe yavlenie [Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon]. Moscow; 1991. (In Russ.).
  2. Gumilev L.N. Skazhu vam po sekretu, chto esli Rossiya budet spasena, to tolko cherez evraziystvo [I will tell you a secret that is Russia is to be saved, it will be only through Eurasianism]. Sotsium. 1992; 9. (In Russ.).
  3. Dugin A. Mnogopolyarnost i neoevraziystvo [Multipolarity and neo-Eurasianism]. 2016. URL: (In Russ.).
  4. Evraziystvo. Deklaratsiya, formulirovka, tezisy [Eurasianism. Declaration, Formulation, Theses]. Prague; 1932. (In Russ.).
  5. Kogan P. Liricheskoe otstuplenie (iz romana v stihah) [[Lyrical digression (from the novel in verse)]. Sovetskie poety, pavshie na Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne. Moscow; 1965. (In Russ.).
  6. Lamansky V.I. Tri mira Aziysko-Evropeyskogo materika [Three worlds of the AsianEuropean continent]. Lamansky V.I. Geopolitika panslavizma. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.).
  7. Lomonosov M.V. Kratkoe opisanie raznikh puteshestvii po severnim moryam i pokazanie vozmojnogo prokhodu Sibirskim okeanom v Vostochnuyu Indiyu [A brief description of various voyages in the northern seas and an indication of the possible passage through the Siberian Ocean to East India]. Lomonosov M.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. Trudi po russkoy istorii, obschestvenno-ekonomicheskim voprosam i geografii. Vol. 6. MoscowLeningrad; 1952. (In Russ.).
  8. Mir Rossii — Evraziya [The World of Russia is Eurasia]. Moscow; 1995. (In Russ.).
  9. Mahan A.T. Vliyanie morskoi sili na istoriyu 1660-1783 gg. [The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660−1783]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
  10. Niekisch E. Zhizn na kotoruyu ya otvazhilsya. Vstrechi i sobitiya [Daring Life. Encounters and Events]. Moscow–Saint Petersburg; 2012. (In Russ.).
  11. Savitsky P.N. Geopoliticheskie zametki po russkoi istorii [Geopolitical notes on Russian history]. Vernadsky G.V. Nachertanie russkoi istorii. Saint Petersburg; 2000. (In Russ.).
  12. Savitsky P.N. Perepiska s predstavitelyami evraziiskogo techeniya po redaktsionnoizdatelskim, agitatsionnim voprosam i voprosam lichnogo kharaktera. 28 iyulya 1928 — 14 marta 1928 [Correspondence with representatives of the Eurasian movement on editorial, publishing, campaigning and personal matters. July 28, 1928 — March 14, 1928]. GA RF. F. 5783. Op. 1. D. 366. L. 75. (In Russ.).
  13. Savitsky P.N. Pismo 1932 g k V.N. Ivanovu [Letter from 1932 to V.N. Ivanov]. GA RF F. 5783 Op. 1. D. 1. (In Russ.).
  14. Spykman N.J. Geografiya i vneshnyaya politika [Geography and foreign policy]. Izvestiya TGU. Gumanitarnie Nauki. 2014; 4. Ch. 1. (In Russ.).
  15. Strauss I.L. Unipolyarnost. Kontsentricheskaya struktura novogo mirovogo poryadka i pozitsiya Rossii [Unipolarity. The concentric structure of the new world order and Russia’s position]. Political Studies. 1997; 2. (In Russ.).
  16. Trubetzkoy N.S. Evropa i chelovechestvo [Europe and Humanity]. Sofia; 1920. (In Russ.).
  17. Tatishchev V.N. Istoriya Rossiiskaya s samikh drevneishikh vremen. Kn. 1. Ch. 2 [Russian History from the Ancient Times. Book 1. Part 2]. Moscow; 1769. (In Russ.).
  18. Haushofer K. Kontinentalny blok Tsentralnaya Evropa — Evraziya — Yaponiya [The continental block: Central Europe, Eurasia, Japan]. Haushofer K. O geopolitike. Moscow; 2001. (In Russ.).
  19. Chizhevsky A.L. Fizicheskie faktori istoricheskogo processa [Physical Factors of Historical Process]. Kaluga; 1924. (In Russ.).
  20. Jaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel [The origin and goal of history]. Jaspers K. Smisl i naznachenie istorii. Moscow; 1991. (In Russ.).
  21. Cohen S.B. Geography and Strategy: Their Interrelationship. A Lecture Delivered at the Naval War College on 17 September 1957. Newport; 1957.
  22. Cohen S.B. Geography and Politics in a World Divided. New York; 1963.
  23. Evelyn J. Navigation and Commerce, their Original and Progress. Containing a Succinct Account of Traffick in General. London; 1674.
  24. Goblet Y.M. Political Geography and the World Map. New York; 1955.
  25. Gray C.S. In defense of the heartland: Sir Halford Mackinder and his critics years on. Global Geostrategy: Mackinder and the Defense of the West. London; 2005.
  26. Kirk W. Geographical Pivots of History. Leicester; 1965.
  27. Mackinder H.J. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. London; 1919.
  28. Macron E. Emmanuel Macron warns Europe: NATO is becoming brain-dead. Economist. November 7, 2019.
  29. Meinig D.W. Heartland and rimland in Eurasian history. Western Political Quarterly. 1956; 9 (3).
  30. Ritter C. Einleitung zur allgemeinen vergleichenden Geographie und Abhandlungen zur Begründung einer mehr wissenschaftlichen Behandlung der Erdkunde. Berlin; 1852.
  31. Schmitt C. Das Meer gegen das Land. Wochenzeitung “Das Reich” vom 9 März 1941. [32] Sörgel H. Europa-Afrika: ein Weltteil. Sozialistische Monatshefte. 1931; 37 (10).

Copyright (c) 2021 Radkevich K.V., Shabaga A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies