Priorities of the student youth: Education, family, work


Based on the data of the survey conducted in 2018, the authors present the Russian students social ideas on possible life trajectories, including relations between young people, marriage, creating a family, birth of children, responsibility for actions in the interpersonal space, interaction with parents, education and career. The authors chose the vignettes technique based on five factors-values describing the student life trajectory. The use of the vignette technique and logistic regression allowed to prove the most significant values of students (independent variables) based on their approval of the actions of the vignette actors (a dependent variable). During the undergraduate period, getting a higher education is a priority compared to starting a family life, having a child, employment and parental support. The value of education is 2.3 times more important than the value of creating a family, and 3.1 times more important than having a child. When evaluating the vignette actions, the priority of education over family creation is more typical for boys. Marrying and creating a family during the student years are approved primarily for girls. The probability of the approval of a young man marrying or starting a family is 29%, while the approval of a girl in the same situation - 96%; childbirth is supported for both girls (30%) and boys (19%), employment - rather for girls (21%), parental support - rather for boys. Education is an absolute priority for all respondents; however, for girls during their student years a more intense life trajectory is approved - getting a higher education, starting a family life, having a child and a job or a part-time job. In the traditional perspective, family and children are an important component of women’s life; however, the girl should have a modernist choice too - with a focus on career and employment.

About the authors

I. B. Nazarova

Higher School of Economics

Author for correspondence.

доктор экономических наук, ведущий эксперт Центра социального предпринимательства и социальных инноваций Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики»; доцент кафедры социологии Российского университета дружбы народов

Myasnitskaya St., 20, Moscow, 101000, Russia

M. P. Zelenskaya

RUDN University


аспирантка кафедры социологии

Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia


  1. Bagirova A.P., Shubat O.M. Semiya i roditelstvo skvoz prizmu mneniy studentok [Family and parenting through the prism of female students’ opinions]. Sotsiologicheskiye Issledovaniya. 2017; 7 (In Russ.).
  2. Gurko T.A., Orlyansky S.A., Tarchenko V.S. Povedenie i ustanovki studentov v chastnoy sfere [Behavior and attitudes of students in the private sphere]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsialnye Nauki. 2019; 4 (In Russ.).
  3. Gurko T.A., Tarchenko V.S. Dinamika brachnykh ustanovok i planov Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya studentov [Dynamics of students’ marriage attitudes and plans]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2019; 7 (In Russ.).
  4. Lapin N.I. Kak chuvstvuyut sebya, k chemu stremyatsya grazhdane Rossii [How Russians feel and what they strive for]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2003; 6 (In Russ.).
  5. Mikhailova E.A., Cherkasova T.V. Tsennostno-motivatsionnye orientatsii studentov v sovremennykh sotsialno-politicheskikh realiyakh (na primere Respubliki Bashkortostan) [Students’ value-motivational attitudes in the contemporary social-political realities (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan)]. Sociologichesky Zhurnal. 2015; 2 (In Russ.).
  6. Nazarova I.B., Zelenskaya M.P. Brak, semiya, obuchenie: ustanovki i predstavleniya studentov [Marriage and family: Students’ attitudes and representations]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2019; 7 (In Russ.).
  7. Nazarova I.B., Zelenskaya M.P. Issledovanie reproduktivnykh ustanovok studencheskoy molodezhi (obzornaya statiya) [Study of the reproductive attitudes of the student youth (review article)]. Ezhegodnik INION RAN. Pod red. V.I. Gerasimova. Ch. 3. Vyp. 12. Moscow; 2017 (In Russ.).
  8. Narbut N.P., Puzanova Zh.V., Larina T.I. Zhizn studenta v evropeyskom izmerenii [The student’s life in the European dimension]. Sociologicheskie Issledovaniya. 2017; 5 (In Russ.).
  9. Panova E.A., Andryushina E.V., Grigorieva N.S. Semeynye strategii sovremennoy rossiyskoy studencheskoy molodezhi (rezultaty komparativnogo analiza dannykh oprosa za 2008 i 2019 gg.) [Family strategies of the contemporary Russian student youth (results of the comparative analysis of the 2008 and 2019 survey data)]. Gosudarstvennoe Upravlenie. 2019; 77 (In Russ.).
  10. Puzanova Zh.V., Tertyshnikova A.G. Metod vinietok v sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: metodologicheskie printsipy i metodicheskie resheniya [The vignettes technique in sociological research: Methodological principles and technical solutions]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2015; 15 (4) (In Russ.).
  11. Trotsuk I.V., Paramonova A.D. “Status” instituta sem’i v sovremennom obshchestve i semeyno-brachnye tsennosti molodezhi [‘Status’ of family institution in the contemporary society, and family and marriage values of the youth]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2016; 16 (4) (In Russ.).
  12. Alexander C.S., Becker H.J. The use of vignettes in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1978; 42 (1).
  13. Finch J. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology. 1987; 21 (1).
  14. Ganong L.H., Coleman M. Multiple segment factorial vignette designs. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006; 68 (2).
  15. Jones C., Aronson E. Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973; 26.
  16. Nosanchuk T.A. The vignette as an experimental approach to the study of social status: An exploratory study. Social Science Research. 1972; 1.
  17. Ponza M., Duncan G.J., Corcoran M., Groskind F. The guns of autumn?: Age differences in support for income transfers to the young and old. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1988; 52 (4).
  18. Rahman N. Caregivers’ sensitivity to conflict: The use of vignette methodology. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect. 1996; 8.
  19. Voysey M. A Constant Burden: The Reconstruction of Family Life. London; 1975.

Copyright (c) 2020 Nazarova I.B., Zelenskaya M.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies