Agricultural cooperation in the Northern Non-Black-Earth Region: formal and informal practices
- Authors: Bozhkov O.B.1, Nikulin A.M.2, Poleshchuk I.K.2
-
Affiliations:
- Sociological Institute - branch of the FCTAS RAS
- Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
- Issue: Vol 20, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 889-904
- Section: Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/25218
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-889-904
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Based on the review of the research on the relationship between cooperation and self-organization in the rural development of Russia and other countries, and also taking into account the recent trends in the international cooperative movement, the authors present the results of the sociological research conducted in 2005-2008, and then in 2018-2019 in nine rural areas of five subjects of the Russian Federation: Leningrad, Vologda, Novgorod, Arkhangelsk and Tver Regions of the Northern Non-Black-Earth Region. These empirical studies were comparative case studies based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The authors consider the historical and contemporary specifics of cooperation and self-organization of the Non-Black-Earth Region as compared to other Russian regions; identify theoretical and practical differences between the concepts ‘cooperation’, ‘self-organization’, ‘mutual assistance’; propose to use the concept ‘symbiosis’ for the analytical explanation of paradoxes of the interaction of traditions and innovations in practices of rural cooperation and mutual assistance. In the final part of the article, the authors provide empirical examples from their sociological studies in the Northern Non-Black-Earth Region, which prove the efficiency of cooperation between local entrepreneurs and rural communities, especially provided measures and programs of the state support to cooperation. The authors emphasize the importance of the symbiosis of formal and informal local cooperative practices, which requires an extremely flexible cooperative policy in order to overcome the legacy of the Soviet bureaucratic overregulation and to revive the historical legacy of the local self-organization of rural communities.
About the authors
O. B. Bozhkov
Sociological Institute - branch of the FCTAS RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: olegbozh@gmail.com
старший научный сотрудник
7th Krasnoarmeiskaya St., 25/14, Saint Petersburg, 190005, RussiaA. M. Nikulin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Email: harmina@yandex.ru
кандидат экономических наук, директор Центра аграрных исследований
Vernadskogo Prosp., 82, Moscow, 119571, RussiaI. K. Poleshchuk
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Email: poleshchuk-ik@ranepa.ru
научный сотрудник Центра аграрных исследований
Vernadskogo Prosp., 82, Moscow, 119571, RussiaReferences
- Averkieva K.V. Mozhem vmeste! Realizatsiya obshchestvennykh initsiativ po-totemski [We can do it together! Community initiatives in the Tot’ma style]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2019; 4 (4) (In Russ.).
- Averkieva K.V. Simbioz selskogo i lesnogo khozyaystva na staroosvoennoy periferii Nechernozemiya: opyt Tarnogskogo rayona Vologodskoy oblasti [Symbiosis of agriculture and forestry on the early-developed periphery of the Non-Black-Earth Region: The case of the Tarnogsky district of the Vologda Region]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (4) (In Russ.).
- Bazhanova I. “Ot razvitiya kooperatsii — k uluchsheniyu kachestva zhizni na sele” [“From the development of cooperation to improving the quality of rural life”]. URL: http://dvinanews.ru/-tbr91110 (In Russ.).
- Bozhkov O.B., Trotsuk I.V. Tendentsii razvitiya selskikh rayonov Rossii: postanovka issledovatelskoy zadachi i pervye rezultaty povtornogo keys-stadi [Tendencies of the Russian rural areas development: The research task and first results of the comparative case-study]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (4) (In Russ.).
- V Arkhangelskoy oblasti sozdan tsentr kompetentsiy v sfere selskogo khozyaystva [In the Arkhangelsk Region, there is a new center of competencies in agriculture]. URL: https://region29.ru/2019/07/18/5d305f15764de972f20b3c62.html (In Russ.).
- Kurakin A.A. 20 let zakonu “o selskokhozyaystvennoy kooperatsii” [20 years of the Law “On Agricultural Cooperation”]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (1) (In Russ.).
- Neformalnaya ekonomika: Rossiya i mir [Informal Economy: Russian and the World]. Pod red. T. Shanina i dr. Moscow; 1999 (In Russ.).
- O sostoyanii selskikh territoriy Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2015–2018 godakh. Yezhegodny doklad po rezultatam monitoringa [On the State of Rural Areas of the Russian Federation in 2015–2018. Annual Monitoring Report]. Moscow; 2018 (In Russ.).
- Ovchintseva L.A. Vozmozhnye napravleniya kooperativnogo razvitiya v regionakh Ros-siyskoy Federatsii [The prospects for the development of cooperatives in regions of the Russian Federation]. Fundamentalnye i Prikladnye Issledovaniya Kooperativnogo Sektora Ekonomiki. 2018; 5 (In Russ.).
- Ozerov E. Selu nuzhna pomoshch [Village needs help]. Vesti Maksatikhi. March 26, 2019 (In Russ.).
- Sobolev A.V., Pakhomov V.M., Rykalin A.S. Selskokhozyaystvennye kooperativy: institutsionalny i regionalny podtekst [Agricultural cooperatives: Institutional and regional subtext]. Fundamentalnye i Prikladnye Issledovaniya Kooperativnogo Sektora Ekonomiki. 2020; 1 (In Russ.).
- Trotsuk I.V. Vozmozhnosti metoda keys-stadi v izuchenii sotsialnykh problem sela [Possibilities of the case study method in the study of rural social problems]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2007; 4 (In Russ.).
- Trotsuk I.V. Monitoringi razvitiya selskikh territoriy: “kolichestvo”, “kachestvo” ili ikh sochetanie? [Rural development monitorings: “Quantity”, “quality”, or a combination of both?]. Materialy IX Grushinskoy konferentsii “Sotsialnaya inzheneriya: kak sotsiologiya menyaet mir”. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).
- Trotsuk I.V. Putevoditel po postsovetskoy agrarnoy reforme v Rossii: ob’ektivnoe i sub’ektivnoe izmerenie selskoy zhizni [A guide to the post-soviet agrarian reform in Russia: Objective and subjective dimensions of rural life]. Russian Peasant Studies. 2017; 2 (3) (In Russ.).
- Fadeeva O.P. Sibirskoe selo: ot formalnogo samoupravleniya k vynuzhdennoy samoorganizatsii [Siberian village: From formal self-administration to the forced self-organization]. ECO. 2019; 4 (In Russ.).
- Chayanov A.V. Kratky kurs kooperatsii [Short Course on Cooperation]. Moscow; 1989 (In Russ.).
- Chayanov A.V. Osnovnye idei i formy organizatsii selskokhozyaystvennoy kooperatsii [Main Ideas and Forms of Agricultural Cooperation]. Moscow; 1927 (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
There are no supplementary files to display.