Risk reflections as a factor for choosing forms of political participation (results of the all-Russian survey)


The article focuses on the population’s perception and understanding of their vulnerability to dangers, assessment of risks, threats and environmental security in the context of all these factors influence on political and social relations. The authors consider a number of issues related to the influence of social-demographic characteristics, political attitudes, level and quality of life on the perception of risks; identify social, institutional and political grounds of risk perception. The article aims at identifying the relationship between risk reflections of different social groups in the Russian society and practices of political participation. The article is based on the data of the all-Russian survey conducted in November 2019 with the support of the Resource Center of the Science Park of the Saint Petersburg State University “Sociological and Internet Studies”. The authors show the attitude of Russians to real actual threats, their willingness to participate in mass protests and various forms of political action. Based on the analysis of z-values, the authors show a possible relationship between the structure of real threats and the willingness of social groups to participate in political actions, and also the impact of age, profession, and income on this relationship. The authors identified groups more inclined to non-conventional political action. Their potential protest is determined not only by dissatisfaction with the level and quality of life, but also by solidarity with other groups and the desire to improve the situation.

About the authors

A. V. Aleinikov

Saint-Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: a.alejnikov@spbu.ru

доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры конфликтологии Института философии

University Emb., 7-9, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034

G. P. Artemov

Saint-Petersburg State University

Email: g.artemov@spbu.ru

доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры этики Института философии

University Emb., 7-9, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034

A. G. Pinkevich

Saint-Petersburg State University

Email: a.pinkevich@spbu.ru

кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры конфликтологии Института философии

University Emb., 7-9, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034


  1. Alexander J. Kulturnaya travma i kollektivnaya identichnost [Cultural trauma and collective identity]. Sociologichesky Zhurnal. 2012; 3 (In Russ.).
  2. Beck U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity]. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).
  3. Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya politiki [Sociology of Politics]. Moscow; 1993 (In Russ.).
  4. Gavrilov K.A. Sotsiologiya vospriyatiya riska: opyt rekonstruktsii klyuchevyh podkhodov [Sociology of Risk Perception: Key Approaches Reconstructed]. Moscow; 2009 (In Russ.).
  5. Gavrilov K.A. Psikhometricheskaja paradigma v issledovanii riska: perevod na russky jazyk i aprobatsija na studencheskoj vyborke [Psychometric paradigm in risk research: Translation into Russian and testing on a student sample]. Monitoring Obshhestvennogo Mnenija: Economicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2020; 2 (In Russ.).
  6. Goncharov D.V. Teorija politicheskogo uchastija [Political Participation Theory]. Moscow; 1997 (In Russ.).
  7. Douglas M. Risk kak sudebny mekhanizm [Risk as a judicial mechanism]. Thesis. 1994; 5 (In Russ.).
  8. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Prinyatie resheniy v neopredelennosti: Pravila i predubezhdeniya [Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases]. Kharkov; 2005 (In Russ.).
  9. Mozgovaya A.V. Socialnaya sfera: vektor izmenenij, riski i adaptatsionne resursy (po materialam obshcherossijskih monitoringovyh issledovanij) [Social sphere: Vectors of change, risks and adaptation resources (results of all-Russian monitoring surveys)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (4) (In Russ.).
  10. Mozgovaya A.V. Adaptatsija k riskam transformatsionnyh protsessov v rossijskom obshhestve: Diss. d.s.n. [Adaptation to the Risks of Transformational Processes in Russia: DSc thesis]. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).
  11. Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Patrioticheskie nastroeniya: dilemma “rodina ili gosudarstvo” [Patriotic mood: Dilemma ‘homeland or state’]. POISK. 2018; 1 (In Russ.).
  12. Kholmskaya M.R. Politicheskoe uchastie kak ob’ekt issledovanija (Obzor otechestvennoj literatury) [Political participation as an object of research (a review of the Russian scientific literature)] Political Studies. 1999; 5 (In Russ.).
  13. Shlykova E.A. Otnoshenie k risku kak differentsiruyushchy faktor vybora sposoba vynuzhdennoj adaptatsii [Attitude to risk as a differentiating factor in choosing a method of forced adaptation]. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4081 (In Russ.).
  14. Sztompka P. Doverie — osnova obshhestva [Trust as a Foundation of Society]. Moscow; 2012 (In Russ.).
  15. Yanitsky O.N. Sociologiya riska [Sociology of Risk]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).
  16. Bassarak C., Pfister H.-R., Böhm G. Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: Extending the psychometric model. Journal of Risk Research. 2017; 20 (3).
  17. Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetic in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge; 1994.
  18. Bodemer N., Gaissmaier W. Risk perception. Cho H., Reimer T., McComas K. (Eds.). Sage Handbook of Risk Communication. Los Angeles; 2015.
  19. Douglas M. Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. London–New York; 1992.
  20. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press; 1982.
  21. Hardy C., Maguire S. Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification” Academy of Management Review. 2016; 41 (1).
  22. Lyng S. Edgework, risk, and uncertainty. Zinn J. (Ed.). Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainties: An Introduction. Chichester; 2008.
  23. Lupton D. Risk. London; 2013.
  24. Miller J.M. Threats and opportunities as motivators of political activism. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248079929.
  25. Miller J.M., Krosnick J.A. Threats as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology. 2004; 25 (4).
  26. Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis. 2000; 20 (1).
  27. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London; 2000.
  28. Tierney K.J. Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum. 1999;14 (2).
  29. Tulloch J., Lupton D. Risk and Everyday Life. London; 2003.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Copyright (c) 2020 Aleinikov A.V., Artemov G.P., Pinkevich A.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies