<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">RUDN Journal of Sociology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-2272</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2408-8897</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumamba</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">25215</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-4-847-863</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Contemporary society: the urgent issues and prospects for development</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Современное общество: актуальные проблемы и перспективы развития</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Risk reflections as a factor for choosing forms of political participation (results of the all-Russian survey)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Риск-рефлексии как фактор выбора форм политического участия (по итогам всероссийского опроса)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Aleinikov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алейников</surname><given-names>Андрей Викторович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры конфликтологии Института философии</p></bio><email>a.alejnikov@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Artemov</surname><given-names>G. P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Артемов</surname><given-names>Георгий Петрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор философских наук, профессор кафедры этики Института философии</p></bio><email>g.artemov@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pinkevich</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пинкевич</surname><given-names>Анна Георгиевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры конфликтологии Института философии</p></bio><email>a.pinkevich@spbu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint-Petersburg State University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 20, NO4 (2020)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 20, №4 (2020)</issue-title><fpage>847</fpage><lpage>863</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-12-12"><day>12</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Aleinikov A.V., Artemov G.P., Pinkevich A.G.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Алейников А.В., Артемов Г.П., Пинкевич А.Г.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Aleinikov A.V., Artemov G.P., Pinkevich A.G.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Алейников А.В., Артемов Г.П., Пинкевич А.Г.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/25215">https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/view/25215</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article focuses on the population’s perception and understanding of their vulnerability to dangers, assessment of risks, threats and environmental security in the context of all these factors influence on political and social relations. The authors consider a number of issues related to the influence of social-demographic characteristics, political attitudes, level and quality of life on the perception of risks; identify social, institutional and political grounds of risk perception. The article aims at identifying the relationship between risk reflections of different social groups in the Russian society and practices of political participation. The article is based on the data of the all-Russian survey conducted in November 2019 with the support of the Resource Center of the Science Park of the Saint Petersburg State University “Sociological and Internet Studies”. The authors show the attitude of Russians to real actual threats, their willingness to participate in mass protests and various forms of political action. Based on the analysis of z-values, the authors show a possible relationship between the structure of real threats and the willingness of social groups to participate in political actions, and also the impact of age, profession, and income on this relationship. The authors identified groups more inclined to non-conventional political action. Their potential protest is determined not only by dissatisfaction with the level and quality of life, but also by solidarity with other groups and the desire to improve the situation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В фокусе внимания статьи - особенности восприятия и осмысления населением своей уязвимости перед опасностями, оценка рисков и угроз, уровня безопасности среды в контексте воздействия всех этих факторов на политические и социальные отношения. Проблематизируется круг вопросов, связанных с влиянием социально-демографических характеристик, политических установок, уровня и качества жизни на восприятие рисков. Фиксируются социальные, институциональные и политические основания восприятия риска. Цель статьи - выявление взаимосвязи между риск-рефлексиями представителей разных социальных групп российского общества и практиками политического участия. Статья основана на данных всероссийского опроса, проведенного в ноябре 2019 года с использованием оборудования ресурсного центра Научного парка Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета «Социологические и интернет-исследования». В статье показано отношение россиян к реальным угрозам, актуальным для них в конкретный момент, готовность участвовать в массовых выступлениях и разных политических действиях. С помощью анализа z-значений выявлена возможная зависимость между структурой реальных угроз и готовностью представителей социальных групп участвовать в политических акциях. Продемонстрировано влияние на указанную проблематику возраста, профессиональной принадлежности, доходов респондентов. Авторы определили наличие групп, более склонных к неконвенциональным политическим действиям. Их потенциальная протестная активность связана не только с неудовлетворенностью уровнем и качеством жизни, но и с солидарностью с другими группами, с желанием улучшить нынешнюю ситуацию.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>risks</kwd><kwd>threats</kwd><kwd>level of security</kwd><kwd>contemporary Russian society</kwd><kwd>political actions</kwd><kwd>protest activity</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>риски</kwd><kwd>угрозы</kwd><kwd>уровень безопасности</kwd><kwd>современное российское общество</kwd><kwd>политические действия</kwd><kwd>протестная активность</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation. Project No. 19-18-00115.</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда. Проект №19-18-00115.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alexander J. Kulturnaya travma i kollektivnaya identichnost [Cultural trauma and collective identity]. Sociologichesky Zhurnal. 2012; 3 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Александер Д. Культурная травма и коллективная идентичность // Социологический журнал. 2012. № 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beck U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modern [Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity]. Moscow; 2000 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М., 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya politiki [Sociology of Politics]. Moscow; 1993 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурдье П. Социология политики. M., 1993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavrilov K.A. Sotsiologiya vospriyatiya riska: opyt rekonstruktsii klyuchevyh podkhodov [Sociology of Risk Perception: Key Approaches Reconstructed]. Moscow; 2009 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаврилов К.А. Социология восприятия риска: опыт реконструкции ключевых подходов. М., 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gavrilov K.A. Psikhometricheskaja paradigma v issledovanii riska: perevod na russky jazyk i aprobatsija na studencheskoj vyborke [Psychometric paradigm in risk research: Translation into Russian and testing on a student sample]. Monitoring Obshhestvennogo Mnenija: Economicheskie i Sotsialnye Peremeny. 2020; 2 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаврилов К.А. Психометрическая парадигма в исследовании риска: перевод на русский язык и апробация на студенческой выборке // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goncharov D.V. Teorija politicheskogo uchastija [Political Participation Theory]. Moscow; 1997 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гончаров Д.В. Теория политического участия. М.,1997.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Douglas M. Risk kak sudebny mekhanizm [Risk as a judicial mechanism]. Thesis. 1994; 5 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дуглас М. Риск как судебный механизм // Thesis. 1994. Вып. 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Prinyatie resheniy v neopredelennosti: Pravila i predubezhdeniya [Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases]. Kharkov; 2005 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Канеман Д., Словик П., Тверски А. Принятие решений в неопределенности: Правила и предубеждения. Харьков, 2005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mozgovaya A.V. Socialnaya sfera: vektor izmenenij, riski i adaptatsionne resursy (po materialam obshcherossijskih monitoringovyh issledovanij) [Social sphere: Vectors of change, risks and adaptation resources (results of all-Russian monitoring surveys)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018; 18 (4) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мозговая А.В. Социальная сфера: вектор изменений, риски и адаптационные ресурсы (по материалам общероссийских мониторинговых исследований) // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Социология. 2018. Т. 18. № 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mozgovaya A.V. Adaptatsija k riskam transformatsionnyh protsessov v rossijskom obshhestve: Diss. d.s.n. [Adaptation to the Risks of Transformational Processes in Russia: DSc thesis]. Moscow; 2019 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мозговая А.В. Адаптация к рискам трансформационных процессов в российском обществе: Дисс. д.с.н. М., 2019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Patrioticheskie nastroeniya: dilemma “rodina ili gosudarstvo” [Patriotic mood: Dilemma ‘homeland or state’]. POISK. 2018; 1 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нарбут Н.П., Троцук И.В. Патриотические настроения: дилемма «родина или государство» // ПОИСК. 2018. № 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kholmskaya M.R. Politicheskoe uchastie kak ob’ekt issledovanija (Obzor otechestvennoj literatury) [Political participation as an object of research (a review of the Russian scientific literature)] Political Studies. 1999; 5 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Холмская М. Р. Политическое участие как объект исследования (Обзор отечественной литературы) // Политические исследования. 1999. № 5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shlykova E.A. Otnoshenie k risku kak differentsiruyushchy faktor vybora sposoba vynuzhdennoj adaptatsii [Attitude to risk as a differentiating factor in choosing a method of forced adaptation]. URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4081 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шлыкова Е.А. Отношение к риску как дифференцирующий фактор выбора способа вынужденной адаптации // URL: http://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=4081.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sztompka P. Doverie — osnova obshhestva [Trust as a Foundation of Society]. Moscow; 2012 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Штомпка П. Доверие - основа общества. М., 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanitsky O.N. Sociologiya riska [Sociology of Risk]. Moscow; 2003 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Яницкий О. Н. Социология риска. М., 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bassarak C., Pfister H.-R., Böhm G. Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: Extending the psychometric model. Journal of Risk Research. 2017; 20 (3).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bassarak C., Pfister H.-R., Böhm G. Dispute and morality in the perception of societal risks: Extending the psychometric model // Journal of Risk Research. 2017. Vol. 20. No. 3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetic in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge; 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetic in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge, 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bodemer N., Gaissmaier W. Risk perception. Cho H., Reimer T., McComas K. (Eds.). Sage Handbook of Risk Communication. Los Angeles; 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bodemer N., Gaissmaier W. Risk perception // Sage Handbook of Risk Communication / Ed. by H. Cho, T. Reimer, K. McComas. L.A., 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Douglas M. Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. London–New York; 1992.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Douglas M. Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. L.-N.Y., 1992.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press; 1982.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley-L.A., 1982.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hardy C., Maguire S. Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification” Academy of Management Review. 2016; 41 (1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hardy C., Maguire S. Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and “riskification” // Academy of Management Review. 2016. Vol. 41. No. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyng S. Edgework, risk, and uncertainty. Zinn J. (Ed.). Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainties: An Introduction. Chichester; 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyng S. Edgework, risk, and uncertainty // Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainties: An Introduction / Zinn J. (Ed.). Chichester, 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lupton D. Risk. London; 2013.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lupton D. Risk. L., 2013.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miller J.M. Threats and opportunities as motivators of political activism. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248079929.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miller J.M. Threats and opportunities as motivators of political activism // URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248079929.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Miller J.M., Krosnick J.A. Threats as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology. 2004; 25 (4).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Miller J.M., Krosnick J.A. Threats as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment // Political Psychology. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis. 2000; 20 (1).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sjöberg L. Factors in risk perception // Risk Analysis. 2000. Vol. 20. No. 1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London; 2000.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. L., 2000.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tierney K.J. Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum. 1999;14 (2).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tierney K.J. Toward a critical sociology of risk // Sociological Forum. 1999. Vol. 14. No. 2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tulloch J., Lupton D. Risk and Everyday Life. London; 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tulloch J., Lupton D. Risk and Everyday Life. L., 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
