Problems of Commercialisation and Commercial Nomination of the Urbanonymic Landscape of Almaty

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The authors conduct a critical analysis of the process of commercialization and commercial nomination in the linguistic landscape of Almaty, the largest megalopolis in Kazakhstan. Two sets of current toponymic problems of the linguistic urban landscape are considered: critical analysis of geospace commercialisation process, megalopolis toponymic policy, where toponym acts as a “commodity”; and sociolinguistic features of ergonym formation, linguocreative approach to the nomination process as a parto f modern naming of the megalopolis linguistic landscape. These two main aspects of the study are aimed at revealing the polylingual, socio-cultural image of the city, at matching the linguistic picture of the world of the citizens, at defining the image strategy in the organisation of urbanonymic space of the metropolis. The issue of urbanonymic terminology also remains relevant, in this regard the study deals with the problem of correspondence/ non-conformity of English and Russian terminology in this area, with some caution it is proposed to adapt the international terminological space in the field of onomastics. The analysis of the linguistic identity of oikodomonyms (name of residential complexes) and ergonyms (brandname) confirms the hypothesis of a growing trend of the urban landscape westernisation, which is of concern in view of the increasing globalisation processes that minimise the national-cultural identity of urbanonyms. As a result of the study the problem areas in the toponymic policy of the metropolis were revealed, the prospects for improving the regulatory aspects of the activities, naming technologies and branding of commercial organisations, companies were identified, alternative solutions were proposed, which can be further applied as guidelines in the toponymic activities in other regions of Kazakhstan.

About the authors

Kyzdarkhan K. Rysbergen

Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Email: ms.rysbergen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4205-9655

Dr.Sc. in Philology (Advanced Doctorate), Professor, Department of Onomastics

28, Shevchenko Str., Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050000

Dana M. Pashan

Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Email: pashan_dan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5930-3247

Ph.D., Senior Researcher of the Department of Onomastics

28, Shevchenko Str., Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050000

Didar A. Sadyk

Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Author for correspondence.
Email: didarsadyk2@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8271-7165

PhD student

71 , al-Farabi str., Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050038

References

  1. Golomidova, M.V. (2017). Modern urbanonymic nomination: Strategic approaches and practical solutions. Problems of Onomastics, 14(3), 185-203. (In Russ.).
  2. Razumov, R.V. & Goryaev, S.O. (2019). Urbanonymic terminology: Systems and problems. Nauchnyi dialog, 9, 130-145. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-130-145 (In Russ.).
  3. Golomidova, M.V. (2019). Use of Product-Naming Techniques for Creating Official City Toponyms: Analysis of Perspectives. Problems of Onomastics, 16(3), 162-172. https://doi. org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.3.037 (In Russ.).
  4. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Heller, M., Pujolar, J. & Duchene, A. (2014). Linguistic commodification in tourism. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(4), 539-566.
  6. Emelyanova, A.M. (2016). The pragmatic aspect of ergonymy (by the example of the names of the public catering establishments of Ufa). Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 7(61), 98-100. (In Russ.).
  7. Alistanova, F.F. (2018). Ergonyms formation on the basis of contamination, hendiadys and language game with the internal form of the word by graphic means. Philology. Theory & Practice, 7(85), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-7-1.20 (In Russ.).
  8. Nosenko, N.V. (2015). Speech game in modern urban nomination. The World of Science, Culture, Education, 2(51), 20-24. (In Russ.).
  9. Vairakh, Yu.V. (2011). Ergourbononymy of the city of Irkutsk: Structural-semantic and linguocultural aspects of the study. Moscow: NITs INFRA-M. (In Russ.).
  10. Zharkynbekova, Sh.K. & Seytkhanova, N.A. (2020). Linguistic transformations in the linguistic landscape of Nur-Sultan. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Philology Series, 1(130), 99-111. https://doiorg/10.32523/2616-678X-2020-130-1-99-111 (In Russ.).
  11. Imanberdiyeva, S.K. (2001). Names of Restaurants in the City. [dissertation]. Almaty: KazNU. (In Russ.).
  12. Kakimova, M. (2004). Typology of ergonyms of the North Kazakhstan region. Almaty: KazNU. (In Russ.).
  13. Madiyeva, G.B. (2018). Onomastics of Kazakhstan: An analytical review (approaches to the study of onyms). Almaty: Kazakh University publ. (In Russ.).
  14. Zamaletdinova, L.R. (2016). Modern Russian urbanonyms in the aspect of creative speech activity [dissertation]. Moscow: RUDN publ. (In Russ.).
  15. Postles, D. (2002). Naming, society and regional identity. Oxford: Leopard’s Head Press.
  16. Cox, B. (1994). English Inn and Tavern Names. URL: https://www.goodreads.com/book/ show/42095470-english-inn-and-tavern-names (accessed: 25.01.2023).
  17. Dunkling, L. & Wright, G. (1987). The Wordsworth Dictionary of Pub Names. Ware: Wordsworth.
  18. Felecan, O. & Bughesiu, A. (2021). Names and naming: Multicultural aspects. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Basik, S.N. (2018). Commodification of toponymy as a phenomenon of socio-economic and cultural geography. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Natural Sciences, 2, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7189-2018-2-59-70 (In Russ.).
  20. Graudina, L.K. (1996). Problems of standardization of the Russian language: reality and forecasts. Culture of Russian speech and communication efficiency. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  21. Madden, D.J. (2018). Pushed off the map: toponymy and the politics of place in New York City. Urban Studies, 5, 3-7.
  22. Rose-Redwood, R., Alderman, D. & Azaryahu, M. (2017). Contemporary issues and future horizons of critical urban toponymy. In: The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics and Space. New York: Routledge. pp. 1-24.
  23. Remchukova, E.N. (2016). Pragmatic and aesthetic value of “mass linguistic creativity”. Proceedings of the Institute of the Russian language named after V.V. Vinogradov, 1(7), 157- 167. (In Russ.).
  24. Lotman, Yu.M. (1994). Conversations about Russian culture. Life and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII - early XIX centuries). St. Petersburg: Art-St. Petersburg. (In Russ.).
  25. Lotman, Yu.M. (2004). Semiosphere. Culture and explosion. Inside thinking worlds. Articles. Research. Notes. St. Petersburg: “Art-SPB”. (In Russ.).
  26. Glukhova, T.I. (2011). Consumption as a factor of changes in social life. URL: https://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2013/02/11/1251420010/Glukhova_2011_5.pdf (accessed: 25.01.2023). (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2024 Rysbergen K.K., Pashan D.M., Sadyk D.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies