Semiotics of Visual Metaphor in Mexican Electoral Discourse: Case-Study of the 2024 Presidential Election Campaign
- Authors: Larionova M.V.1, Mosina S.K.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
- Issue: Vol 15, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 1021-1039
- Section: FUNCTIONAL SEMANTICS, GRAMMAR AND STYLISTICS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/41826
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-3-1021-1039
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KFYAXU
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of the study is explained by the need to consider the functioning of the mechanisms of discursive sensemaking and an impact on the recipients of information, taking into account the new linguosemiotic opportunities which modern political communication provides and which are manifested not only in the real life, but also in the virtual digital environment. The multimedia technologies are gaining an increasing role, allowing to encode discursive messages, using semiotically polycode format, combining the traditional verbal way of presenting information along with iconic, color, graphic, metatext and other formats. The aim of the study is to prove that semiotic parameters of visual metaphor as a polycode sign functioning in the discursive environment within the framework of the pragmatic situation “Elections”, determine its interpretative and semantic potential and interacting with other sign codes result in new meanings and interpretations. The materials for the study of visual metaphors are the official logos used during the 2024 election campaign in Mexico. The research methodology, which allows for a systematic study of visual metaphors semiotics, is based on the interdisciplinary and polyparadigmatic model of discourse studies and implies an integral approach that combines the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison and analogy with the method of sociolinguistic interpretation, semantic, interpretive, linguocognitive and discourse analysis. It has been found out that the linguosemiotic paradigm of Mexican electoral discourse integrates verbal and non-verbal semiotic codes to express meanings, conceptualize and categorize reality. By using of various semiotic codes, the metaphor-logo condenses the semantic content and, as a cognitive model based on analogy, acts as a means of sensemaking, modelling the perception of the world in the interests of the addresser. The use of polysemantic iconic signs-images, understandable to a wide audience of voters, translates connotative, ideological and social meanings. Thus, a visual metaphor as a way of logical comprehension and verbalization of reality functions as a significant component of the cognitive space within electoral discourse.
Keywords
About the authors
Marina V. Larionova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: larionova.m@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6466-7363
SPIN-code: 5303-1160
Scopus Author ID: 57207834882
ResearcherId: E-3214-2016
Dr. Sc. (Philology), Prof., Department of Spanish Language
76, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454Sofia K. Mosina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Email: sophiemosina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0569-9717
SPIN-code: 4201-8787
PhD Student, lecturer at the Department of Spanish Language
76, Vernadsky ave., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454References
- Larionova, M.V. & Demkina, A.V. (2021). Hashtag as a Linguocognitive Unit of Spanish Political Discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12(3), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-3-774-788 (In Russ.).
- Budaev, E.V. (2016). Critical analysis of political discourse: main trends of contemporary foreign research. Political linguistics, 6(60), 12–17. (In Russ.).
- Vershinin, M.S. (2001). Political communication in information society. Saint Petersburg: Mikhailov V.A. Publ. (In Russ.).
- Klyuev, Yu.V. (2010). Political discourse in mass communication: analysis of public political interaction. St.Petersburg: SPBU Publ. (In Russ.).
- Mikhaleva, O.L. (2009). Political discourse: Specificity of manipulative influence. Moscow: Library House. (In Russ.).
- Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2014). The discourse of power and the power of discourse: problems of speech influence. Moscow: Flint-Media. (In Russ.).
- Chudinov, A.P. (2006). Political linguistics. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka. (In Russ.).
- Sheigal, E.I. (2004). Semiotics of political discourse. Moscow: Gnosis. (In Russ.).
- Dijk, T.A. van. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. London: SAGE Publ.
- Farrelly, M. (2015). Discourse and Democracy. Critical Analysis of the Language of Government. London: Routledge.
- Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Chilton, P.A. (2004). Analysing political discourse: theory and practice. London: Routledge; Taylor & Francis.
- Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.
- Pavlina S.Yu. (2021). Translation Perspective on Persuasive Strategy Implementation in American Pre-Electoral Discourse. MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Education, 2(42), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-913X.2021.42.2.07 (In Russ.).
- Larionova, M.V. (2024). Linguosemiotics of Electoral Discourse (A Study of the Election Campaigns in Spain, 2023). Political Linguistics, 3(105), 21–32. (In Russ.).
- Chaney, P. (2013). Electoral discourse and formative structural narratives of welfare divergence in multi-level systems: homelessness policy in UK elections 1970–2011. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29(1), 28–47.
- Benoit, W.L. (2003). Topic of presidential campaign discourse and election outcome. Western Journal of Communication, 67(1), 97–112.
- Zasursky, I.I. (1999). Mass media of the second republic. Moscow: MSU Publ. (In Russ.).
- Popova, O.V. (2017). Metaphor as a cognitive tool for creating visual imagery. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 7(256), 194—198. (In Russ.).
- Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2017). Speech influence in political, advertising and Internet discourse. Moscow: Lenand. (In Russ.).
- Chulkina, N.L. & Makashova, V.V. (2024). Visual Metaphors in Pedagogical Discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15(1), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-1-211-231 (In Russ.).
- Isakova, E.M. & Kryukova, N.F. (2021). Visual metaphor and ways of its identification. Vestnik TvGU Series: Philology, 4(71), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.26456/vtfilol/2021.4.095 (In Russ.).
- Bolshakova, L.S. (2008). Cognitive mechanism of creating visual metaphors in English musical video clips. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2. (In Russ.).
- Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Metaphor and discourse. Theory of metaphor. Moscow. (In Russ.).
- Slovikova, E.L. & Eltsova, M.N. (2012). Synergetic categories of discourse (advertising discourse data). Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology, 2(18), 67–83. (In Russ.).
- Roa-Castellanos, R.A. (2018). La política de colores: ¿Partidos naranja? Universidad del Rosario. URL: https://urosario.edu.co/revista-nova-et-vetera/columnistas/la-politica-decolores-partidos-naranja (accessed: 09.07.2024).
- Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford.
- Hall, S. (1980). Encoding, decoding in the television discourse. Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson.