Resistance to Objection in Nonfiction Discourse: Promotive and News Text
- Authors: Prokofeva N.A.1, Shcheglova E.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 15, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 735-754
- Section: DISCURSIVE LINGUISTICS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/semiotics-semantics/article/view/41810
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-3-735-754
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HDPLCE
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The topicality of the study of nonfiction journalistic discourse concerning the communicative action of objection is connected with the existing changes which happened in the perception of science by the public and the journalistic interpretation of this sphere of activity. The scientific sphere becomes more transparent which demands extra efforts in the broadcasting of scientific knowledge and representation of achievements and discoveries in the field of science to the public reader. This explains the necessity to increase the resistance of mediatext about the science to the objection and denial by the target audience. The purpose of the article is the analysis of mechanisms for increasing the resistance of mediatext to objection. The empiric base includes hypermediatext about scientific discoveries of Rosatom in struggling against cancer. Under the development of new media it is impossible to ignore the new methods of information broadcasting to the final consumer, therefore the base for analysis includes sources which interact differently with the audience: TG-channel “Country Rosatom”, cognominal house publication, non-special media. The selected sources were analyzed from the viewpoint of meaning positions of speech subjects - modality, denotation, communicativeness. It is interesting that in each source there dominates one of meaning aspects, thus, providing the resistance to objection on each stage of information cause presentation. In contemporary media the news discourse is the continuation of promotive discourse, the mechanisms of increasing the text resistance to objection, developed on the stage of promotive discourse, are later performed in the news one. After the analysis it was revealed that the dominant aspect of meaning position of speech subject on TG-channel is modality as a generalized announcement about the significance of the discovery, because it is the first appearance and the easiest for perception. In house publication which follows the TG-channel in the discussion the communicativeness goes forward, here happens the approval of mechanisms for resistance to objection, develops the main system of images, metaphors, representing the role of the discovery for the society, later the approved methods are applied in non-special media - namely journalistic publications. On the last stage in hypermediatext we see the traditional mass media, here denotation as the message about the effectiveness and the opportunity to ensure wide spread and appliance of new technologies goes forward.
About the authors
Natalia A. Prokofeva
Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: n.prokofieva@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3105-4530
SPIN-code: 5119-4290
Scopus Author ID: 56993661200
ResearcherId: F-9622-2015
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Media Linguistics, Research Fellow
7-9, Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199034Ekaterina A. Shcheglova
Saint Petersburg State University
Email: e.scheglova@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1778-2021
SPIN-code: 6634-0177
Scopus Author ID: 57222810880
ResearcherId: F-7846-2015
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Media Linguistics, Leading Researcher
7-9, Universitetskaya Embankment, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 199034References
- Bulavinova, M.P. (2018). Scientific communication: development factors. Science and society: modern foreign research, 2018, 51–62. (In Russ.).
- Burns, T.W., O’Conner, D.J. & Stocklmayer, S.M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public understanding of science, 12(2), 183–202. https://doi. org/10.1177/09636625030122004
- Zagidullina M.V. (2021). Communicative practices of the scientific community in the aspect of mediatization of science. In: Journalism — medialogy — mentoring. Minsk: Belarusian State University publ. pp. 294–295. (In Russ.).
- Rysakova, P.I. (2022). Strategies for scientific popularization in the digital media environment. Media linguistics, 9(4), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.402 (In Russ.).
- Bryanik, N.V., Tomyuk, O.N., Starodubtseva, E.P. & Lamberov L.D. (2014). History and philosophy of science. Yekaterinburg: Ed. Ural. University. (In Russ.).
- Arutyunova, N.D. (2009). Communicative reaction to the truth value of the statement of another. In: Logical analysis of the language: assertion and negation. Moscow: Indrik. pp. 5–10. (In Russ.).
- Duskaeva, L.R. (2022). Speech practices of objection in text formation of popular science media communication. In: Dialogue-dispute in popular science communication (Series “Language in mass media coordinates”). St. Petersburg: Mediapapir. (pp. 94–108). (In Russ.).
- Duskaeva, L.R. (2023). Directions for the popularization of science in mass media. In: Media linguistics. Proceedings of the VII International Conference. St. Petersburg: Mediapapir. pp. 219–223. (In Russ.).
- Duskaeva, L.R. (2023). Speech organization of the metatext telegram post. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 10: Journalism, 1, 30–65. https://doi.org/10.30547/vestnik. journ.1.2023.3065 (In Russ.).
- Shaklein, V.M. (2023). Russian blogosphere: pragmatic and linguocultural specifics of the implementation of the category of connectivity. Moscow: Flint. (In Russ.).
- Zadvornaya, E.G. (2020). On the phenomenon of communicative resistance. In: Linguistics, linguodidactics, linguoculturology: current issues and development prospects. Minsk: BSU publ. pp. 8–12. (In Russ.).
- Ivanova, L.Yu. (2023). Speech effect of objection in popular science communication as a representation of communicative resistance. In: Presentation of scientific knowledge in media dialogue: contexts, technologies and language technologies (Series “Language in mass media coordinates”). St. Petersburg: Mediapapir. pp. 142–154. (In Russ.).
- Bakharev, A.I. (1980). Denial in logic and grammar. Saratov: Saratov University publ. (In Russ.).
- Bondarenko, V.N. (1983). Denial as a logical-grammatical category. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
- Arutyunova, N.D. (Ed.) (2009). Logical analysis of language: assertion and negation. Moscow: Indrik. (In Russ.).
- Sternina, E.S. (2015). Category of denial: logical-linguistic aspect. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 9(51), II, 211–214. (In Russ.).
- Krasukhin, K.G. (2020). Denial and uncertainty in language and logic. Questions of psycholinguistics, 1(43), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2020-43-1-132-138 (In Russ.).
- Kunaeva, N.V. (2009). Discursive analysis of statements in a situation of objection: on the material of the English language [dissertation].Voronezh. (In Russ.).
- Luzhnaya, M.M. (2022). Ironic disagreement and objection in everyday communication. Research and development. Modern communicative studies, 11(2), 30–39. https://doi. org/10.12737/2587-9103-2022-11-2-30-39 (In Russ.).
- Lebedinskaya, E.Yu. (2024). Varieties of ironic objection in popular science network media text. Media linguistics, 11(1), 76–102. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2024.105 (In Russ.).
- Shcheglova, E.A. (2022). Forms of objection in the media dialogue about new lexicographic projects. In Dialogue-dispute in popular science communication (Series “Language in mass media coordinates”). St. Petersburg: Mediapapir. pp. 161–172. (In Russ.).
- Prokofeva, N.A. (2023). Objection in news coverage of the achievements of science and technology of the country. In Presentation of scientific knowledge in the media dialogue: contexts, technologies and language technologies (Series “Language in mass media coordinates”). St. Petersburg: Mediapapir. pp. 85–92. (In Russ.).
- Duskaeva, L.R. (2004). The dialogical nature of newspaper speech genres. Perm. (In Russ.).
- Lapteva, M.L. & Firsova, M.A. (2023). Linguistic and cultural foundations of verbal aggression in the Russian language. Russian Language Studies, 21(4), 429–439. http://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-4-424-439 (In Russ.).