The Problem of Semantic Shift in Modern Russian: Corpus Research on the Example of a News Media Discourse

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

This study discusses the issue of semantic shifts observed in high-frequency words, such as discourse, paradigm, narrative , in the news media discourse in the Russian language. It is shown that one of the effective methods of research is corpus analysis, for which an author’s corpus was created based on a random sample of texts of news articles published on the portal of the state news agency RIA Novosti over 2020-2023. Dynamic processes in the semantics of the analyzed highfrequency words were studied on the material of the National Corpus of the Russian language for the period 2000-2019. When considering the results obtained by the corpus analysis method, it was found out that, being initially the linguistic term, “narrative” turned into a functional proforma as a result of a semantic shift that occurred due to the diversity of newly acquired meanings, i.e. there was a modification of the original meaning of the word ‘ story, narration’ , which made the world into the universal one. The classical meaning of the word ‘ paradigm’ , characteristic of linguistics, is not represented in journalism, in the news media discourse it has been given other connotations such as scheme, model, idea, situation , which have moved into the core, nuclear area from the position of the near periphery. Some values are unique, so they have a small frequency (ipm). The interdisciplinary term “discourse” has turned into a term with vague semantics, but, unlike “narrative”, it is not a universal professional form, although it denotes processes occurring in various social spheres. It is shown that the semantic shift is not identical to the increase in the meaning of the word and is not determined strictly contextually. It is necessary to distinguish between the concept of semantic shift and the appearance of new meanings of the word, since the former is fixed in non-standard contexts and the demonstrated meaning cannot be clearly defined. In the course of the study, it was possible to establish that not all semantic shifts should be classified as erroneous, since it depends on the sphere in which the shift was detected. The use of the considered words in a different meaning is not profane, since the mobility of the lexical level of the language leads to transformations in speech and media discourse, allowing the appearance of texts stylistically close to the spoken style. Thus, we have identified and confirmed quantitatively the process of transformation of the words selected for analysis into pro-forms used as substitutes for a wide range of concepts.

About the authors

Mikhail V. Belyakov

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Email: m.belyakov@my.mgimo.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6230-9893
SPIN-code: 1761-5400

Dr.Sc. in Philology (Advanced Doctorate), Professor at the Department of Russian Language

76, Vernadskogo av., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454

Olga I. Maksimenko

State University of Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: maxbel7@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6611-8744
SPIN-code: 7708-5901

Dr.Sc. in Philology (Advanced Doctorate), Professor, Professor at the Faculty of Linguistics at Department of language theory, Anglistics and Applied Linguistics

24, Very Voloshinoy str., city of Mytishi, Moscow Region, Russian Federation, 141014

References

  1. Zheltukhina, M.R. (2016). Media discourse. Discourse-Pi, 14 (3–4), 292–296. (In Russ.).
  2. Temnikova, L.B. (2016). On the question of the typology of media discourse. Scientific Journal of KubGAU, 119(05), 1–8. (In Russ.).
  3. Kibrik, A.A. (2008). Is the concept justified “media discourse”? Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse, 6, 6–11. (In Russ.).
  4. Deik T.A., van. (2000). Analysis of news as a discourse. In: Language, cognition, communication. Moscow—Blagoveshchensk: I.A. Baudouin de Courtenay BGC Publ. pp. 11–160. (In Russ.).
  5. Dobrosklonskaya, T.G. (2016). News discourse as an object of media linguistic analysis. In: The discourse of modern mass media in the perspective of theory, social practice and education. Belgorod. pp. 13 (In Russ.).
  6. Vorotnikova, yu.S. (2006). Parameters of news discourse in electronic English-language media. In: Genres and types of text in scientific and media discourse: proceedings. Orel: OGIIK. pp. 39–45. (In Russ.).
  7. Kozhemyakin, E.A. (2010). Mass communication and media discourse: towards a research methodology. Scientific Journal of Belgorod State University. Series of Humanities, 6 (12(86)), 13––21. (In Russ.).
  8. Efanova, L.G. (2012). Categorical semantics of the norm in the meanings of lexical units. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 1(17), 5–13. (In Russ.).
  9. Dorofeev, yu.V. (2020). Transformation of the semantics of linguistic units in the text: a functional approach. Scientific notes of Kazan University. Humanities series, 162(5), 48–61. (In Russ.).
  10. Sizova, O.A. (2022). Causes and types of semantic changes of the word. Young scientist, 24, 152–154. (In Russ.).
  11. Blank, A. (1999). Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical Semantic change. In: Blank, A. & Koch, P. Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin— New york: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 61–99. https://bothonce.com/10.1515/9783110804195.61
  12. Uspensky, V.A. Are semantic shifts harmless? [electronic resource]. URL: http://old.russ.ru/ist_sovr/20020614.html (accessed: 09/15/2023). (In Russ.).
  13. Labov, W. (1973). Sociolinguistic Pattern. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  14. Obdalova, O.A. & Levashkina, Z.N. (2019). The concept of “narrative” as a cultural phenomenon and an object of discursive activity. Language and culture, 48, 332–348. (In Russ.).
  15. Terebkov, A.S. (2012). On the interpretation of the phenomenon of narrative in modern humanitarian knowledge. Essence and origins. Omsk Scientific Bulletin, 3(109), 114–117. (In Russ.).
  16. Shilikhina, K.M. (2013). Ironic narrative: features of the text structure. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 1, 59–62. (In Russ.).
  17. Popova, T.I. (2019). Narrative and narration: correlation of concepts. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Language. Literature. Culture, 2, 46. (In Russ.).
  18. Babayan, V.N. (2017). Various approaches to the definition of the concept of “discourse” and its main characteristics. Verkhnevolzhsky Philological Bulletin, 1, 76–81. (In Russ.).
  19. Nordman, I.B. (2015). The essence and content of the concept of “paradigm” in the context of a paradigmatic. Theory and practice of social development, 1, 35. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2024 Belyakov M.V., Maksimenko O.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies