“Russian Idea” Ideologeme in the Russian Conceptual and Linguistic Pictures of the World

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The study examines the specifics of understanding the Russian idea ideologeme in the Russian conceptual and language pictures of the world. The subject of the study is the compound name of the Russian idea, used in philosophical and political discourses, fragments of which are included in the National Corps of the Russian Language. The purpose of the study is to perform linguocognitive modeling of the ideological concept of the Russian idea as a unit of thinking, justifying the structural and semantic components. The cognitive matrix of the concept includes the following levels: precedent, prototypical, ideologicalevaluative, national-cultural, identification and association-shaped. having substantiated the structural and semantic components. The cognitive matrix of the concept includes such levels as: precedent, prototypical, ideological-evaluative, national-cultural, identification and association-shaped. Using the methodology of cognitive matrix analysis of knowledge representation, it was proved that the plane of expressing the ideologeme is represented by five main and four marginal options; the plane of the content of the ideologeme is determined, on the one hand, by the conceptual base, the projected historical and cultural component of the semantic field, on the other hand, by the content updated in the second half of the 20th - early 21st centuries. The ideological component of the concept is ambivalent, due to the paradigm of situational models (frames) of a socio-political, philosophical, religious nature, the representation of which by speakers implies an explicit or implicit assessment of the event. The results of the study extend the boundaries of linguocognitive modeling of concepts. The proposed model of cognitive interpretation of an ideological concept can be used in describing a wide range of ideologues.

About the authors

Svetlana N. Starodubets

Bryansk State Academician I.G. Petrovski University

Author for correspondence.
Email: starodubets.madam@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3135-6678
SPIN-code: 1485-6411

Dr.Sc. (Philology), Professor of the Department of Socio-Economic and Humanitarian Disciplines

14, Bezhitskaya str., Bryansk, Russian Federation, 241036

Olga V. Belugina

Bryansk State Academician I.G. Petrovski University

Email: OBelugina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1081-234X
SPIN-code: 9810-5917

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Socio-Economic and Humanitarian Disciplines

14, Bezhitskaya str., Bryansk, Russian Federation, 241036

Oksana U. Kolegova

Bryansk State Academician I.G. Petrovski University

Email: troy79@mail.ru
PhD of the Department of English Language Theory and Translation Studies, Bryansk State University n.a. Acad. I.G. Petrovsky (Novozybkov branch); Senior Lecturer at the Department of English Language N 4 MGIMO 14, Bezhitskaya str., Bryansk, Russian Federation, 241036

References

  1. Nikolic, M. & Novospasskaya, N.V. (2013.). Terms of kinship in Russian and Serbian languages. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 1, 74–78. (In Russ.).
  2. Chudinov, A.P. (2006). Political linguistics. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russ.).
  3. Kupina, N.A. (1995). Totalitarian language: vocabulary and speech reactions. Ekaterinburg; Perm, Ural University Press. (In Russ.).
  4. Klushina, N.I. (2014). Contextual Dimensions of mythologeme. In: Stylistics Today and Tomorrow: Conference Proceedings. Moscow. pp. 154–157. (In Russ.).
  5. Radbil', T.B. (2010). Fundamentals of the study of language mentality. Moscow: Flinta-Nauka. (In Russ.).
  6. Malysheva, E.G. (2009). Ideologeme as a linguocognitive phenomenon: definition and classification. Political Linguistics, 4(30), 32–40. (In Russ.).
  7. Golovanevskij, A.L. (2001). Ideological Concepts in Lexicographic Discourse: Semantics, Pragmatics, Syntagmatics. In: Principles and Methods of Philology Research: End of the 20th Century: Sat. articles scientific method. Seminar “TEXTUS”. Vol. 6. St. Petersburg; Stavropol. pp. 335–339. (In Russ.).
  8. Starodubets, S.N. (2010). The specifics of the organization of linguistic symbolic means in the discourse of I.A. Ilyina [dissertation]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  9. Chepkova, T.P. (2007). Linguistic status of composite names of the Russian language. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 20, 162–168. (In Russ.).
  10. Kozhin, A.N. (1969). Compound names in Russian (on the basis of military business vocabulary). In: Thoughts on the modern Russian language: a collection of articles. Moscow. pp. 31–46. (In Russ.).
  11. Burov, A.A. (1999). Syntactic aspects of substantive nomination in modern Russian: in 2 parts. Pyatigorsk. (In Russ.).
  12. Starodubets, S.N. (2005). “Russian idea” as a basic concept of the religious philosophy of the Russian abroad in the first half of the twentieth century. Lecturer. XXI Century, 4, 41–46. (In Russ.).
  13. Kulikov, V.G. (2008). Cognitive-matrix analysis of dialect units. In: Principles and methods of cognitive language research: Collection of scientific papers. Tambov: Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin Publ. pp. 73–86. (In Russ.).
  14. Peskov, A.M. (2007). Russian idea of Russian literature. S.P. Shevyrev. Psychological aspects of Russian historiosophy. In: “Russian idea” and “Russian soul”: Essays on Russian historiosophy. Moscow: OGI. pp. 56–72. (In Russ.).
  15. Boldyrev, N.N. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics: Monograph. Moscow–Berlin. (In Russ.).
  16. Boldyrev, N.N. (2008). Principles and methods of cognitive language research. In: Principles and methods of cognitive language research: Collection of scientific papers. Tambov: Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin Press. Pp. 11–29. (In Russ.).
  17. Boldyrev, N.N. (2004). Conceptual space of cognitive linguistics. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 1, 18–36. (In Russ.).
  18. Timofeev, S.E. (2018). Ideologeme “Russian world” in modern political discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 9(1), 186–200. (In Russ.).
  19. Stepanov, Yu.S. (2004). Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt. (In Russ.).
  20. Vorobyov, V.V. (2006). Russian idea as a linguoculturological concept. In: Linguoculturology. Moscow: RUDN Publ. pp. 147–155. (In Russ.).
  21. National corpus of the Russian language. URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru (accessed: 01.02.2021). (In Russ.).
  22. Popova, Z.D. & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Modeling the content of the concept (cognitive interpretation of the results of linguistic research). In: Problems of representation (representation) in language. Types and formats of knowledge: Collection of scientific papers. Moscow–Kaluga: Eidos. pp. 322–329. (In Russ.).
  23. Denisenko, V.N. (2012). The general meaning of units of the semantic field: the formation and content of the concept. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 3, 12–15. (In Russ.).
  24. Starodubets, S.N. (2021). Ideological appraisal and ideological connotation of compound names. In: Russian language in a multicultural world: Collection of scientific papers of V International Symposium, International Festival “The Great Russian Word”: in 2 vols. E.Ya. Titarenko (Ed.). Simferopol. pp. 246–251. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2023 Starodubets S.N., Belugina O.V., Kolegova O.U.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies