Words with Value Semantics in the Language Consciousness of Generation «Y» Representatives

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The author analyzes the composition of the associative content and the semantic areas behind the signs that convey values in the linguistic consciousness of native 30-40 years old speakers of the Russian language. Responding to incentives of family, work, money etc. revealed the types of speech action in the situation of a free and directed associative experiment. The actualization of meanings in the process of responding to value-significant stimuli established the uniformity of cognitive mechanisms, the absence of complexity in the cognitive structure of associative fields, the prevalence of semantic areas representing socially and personally significant intangible objects - family, love, morality, ethics, a person that should be stored, developed, transmit. Most of the cases of directed association are associated with the unambiguous nature of the response, clear boundaries of the stereotype area, a low level of emotion and evaluation, the frequency of complex reactions (series of enumerations, for example, values - security, comfort, stability, family, one’s job, country). The concentration of stereotypical meanings (the area of frequency reactions of the core of associative fields) is higher when responding to stimuli What kind of work …, Work requires what …, What kind of family …. The remaining stimuli cause an approximate equality of stereotyped and individual ways of responding. The life experience of the respondents had a significant impact on the choice of the type of speech action and the method of response.

About the authors

Larisa O. Butakova

Dostoevsky Omsk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: larisabut@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3210-2311

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of Russian Language, Literature and Document Communications

55 A, Av. Mira, Omsk, Russian Federation, 644077

References

  1. Basic values of the bearers of Russian culture. Dictionary (2019). Tarasov, E.F. (Ed.). Moscow: RAN Institute of Linguistics. (In Russ.).
  2. Bubnova, I.A. & Kazachenko, O.V. (2018). The dynamics of the semantic content of the meaning of the word freedom. Psycholinguistics, 23(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1199099 (In Russ.).
  3. Kazachenko, O.V. (2021). The structure and content of the axiological sphere of the Russian image of the world in the XXI century [dissertaion]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  4. Komnatnaya, S.R. (2022). Subjective semantics of words representing social and normative relations in the modern Russian language [dissertaion]. Omsk.
  5. Tarasov, E.F. (2012). The problem of analyzing the content of universal values. Journal of Psycholinguistic, 1(15), 8–17. (In Russ.).
  6. Schwartz, S.H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In: Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, R. Jowell et al. (eds.). London: Sage. pp. 169–203.
  7. Schwartz, S.H. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national. Moscow: State University Higher School of Economics Press.
  8. Renner, W. (2003). Human values: A lexical perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00037-5
  9. Tyler, S. (2020). Human Behavior and the Social Environment. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas. URL: https://uark.pressbooks.pub/hbse1/ (accessed: 21.01.2022).
  10. Zhu, Zhuyshuan (2017). The content of moral values in the language picture of the world (on the material of Chinese and Russian languages) [dissertation]. Diss … Cand. Philol. Sciences. Moscow: RAN Institute of Linguistics. (In Russ.).
  11. Pishchalnikova, V.A. (2021). History and theory of Psycholinguistics. Moscow: R. Valent. (In Russ.).
  12. Goldin, V.E. & Sdobnova, A.P. (2016). Model of associative response, spheres of reference of stimuli and picture of the world. Journal of Psycholinguistic, 2(28), 112–119.
  13. Zalevskaya, A.A. (2011). The meaning of the word through the prism of experiment. Tver: Tver state university. (In Russ.).
  14. Zalevskaya, A.A. (2014). Interface Theory of Word Meaning: psycholinguistic approach. Tver: Tver state. university. (In Russ.).
  15. Kurganova, N.I. (2019). An associative experiment as a method for studying the meaning of a living word. Journal of Psycholinguistic, 3(41), 24–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2019-41-3-24-37
  16. Kurganova, N.I. (2012). The Role and Place of the Semantic Field in Modeling the Structural and Operational Parameters of the Meaning of a Word [dissertation]. Tver: Tver state university. (In Russ.).
  17. Leontiev, A.A. (2003). Word in speech activity. Some problems of the general theory of speech activity. Moscow: URSS. (In Russ.).
  18. Pishchalnikova, V.A., Kardanova-Biryukova, K.S., Panarina, N.S., Stepykin, N.I., Khlopova, A.I. & Shevchenko, S.N. (2019). Associative experiment: theoretical and applied perspectives of psycholinguistics. V.A. Pishchalnikova (Ed.). Moscow: R. Valent. (In Russ.).
  19. Sternin, I.A. (2020). Problems of interpretation of the results of associative experiments. Journal of Psycholinguistic, 3(45), 110–126. (In Russ.).
  20. Stepykin, N.I. (2021). Speech action as a psycholinguistic mechanism for the generation and actualization of meaning [dissertation]. Moscow. (In Russ.).
  21. Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Hoboken: Blackwell Publ.
  22. Pranoto, B.E. & Afrilita, L.K. (2019). The Organization of Words in Mental Lexicon: Evidence from Word Association Test. Teknosastik, 16(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v16i1.130
  23. Elman, J.L. (2011). Lexical knowledge without a lexicon? Methodological and Analytic Frontiers in Lexical Research (Part II). Special Issue of “The Mental Lexicon”, 6(1), 1–33.
  24. McLaren, I.P.L., McAndrew, A., Angerer, K., McLaren, R., Forrest, Ch., Bowditch, W., Monsell, St. & Verbruggen, F. (2018). Association and cognition: Two processes, one system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818766287

Copyright (c) 2022 Butakova L.O.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies