Inner Language Form as a Determinant of its Lexical Peculiarity (based on the Study Material of the Russian and the Teleut Languages Paroemia)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the present article we make an effort to develop the ideas of the Russian linguist G.P. Melnikov about the determinants of the language system in the context of his study about the dynamic language nature. The article is devoted to argumentation of peculiarity of multi-structural languages lexical recourses based on their inner form. Significance of the present article is determined, at first, by increased interest from scientists to comparative study of the languages used within one territory in conditions of preservation of their national and cultural originality; second, by insufficient information about linguistic peculiarities of short folklore genre of the Teleut people; third, by scientific relevant tendency to explanatoriness of surveys in the sphere of modern linguistics that is directed to human beings and the world around them. The goal of the authors is to research typical communicatively relevant ways to reflect extralinguistic reality that determine vocabulary of the Russian and Teleut languages. To achieve the stated goal the authors use in the present article data-fetching methods (data from dictionaries, via informants interviewing and questionnaire), descriptions, comparisons, experiments as well as the methods of linguoculturological and statistic analyses. The material for this study is based on proverbs, superstitions, riddles, idioms that are regarded as the elements of the Russian and Teleut people spiritual culture. Communicative aspects of culturally significant facts comprehension identified through lexical universals analyses allow us to define the national world-image of the Russian and Teleut people. The conducted research proved that received during the analyses typical and unique coding methods of the information preserved in the depths of national memory determine lexical originality of compared languages. As a result, the study of paroemiological fund of the Russian and Teleut language that is based on the inner form category allowed the authors of the present article to reveal the mechanism of linguoculturological processes happening between them.

About the authors

Elvira S. Denisova

Kemerovo State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: elvdenisova@yandex.ru

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Chair of Style and Rhetoric, Institute of Philology

Krasnaya Str., 6, Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650000

Anastasia V. Proskurina

Kemerovo State University

Email: proscurina@yandex.ru

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Chair of Style and Rhetoric, Institute of Philology

Krasnaya Str., 6, Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650000

References

  1. Araeva, L.A., Denisova, E.S., Katyshev, P.A., Melnik, N.V., Olenev, S.V. & Evseeva, I.V. (2014). Names of dishes and establishments of Japanese cuisine in Russian linguistic culture: structural and pragmatics, Life Science Journal, 11 (11), 362—366.
  2. Humboldt, V. von. (2001). Selected works on linguistics. Moscow: OJSC IG Progress. (In Russ.).
  3. Baudouin de Courtenay, I.A. (2018). General linguistics. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House. (In Russ.).
  4. Potebnya, A.A. (2007). Thought and language. Moscow: Labyrinth. (In Russ.).
  5. Mel’nikov, G.P. (2003). System typology of languages. Principles, methods, models. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  6. Mel’nikov, G.P. (1998). The internal form of the Russian language is the key to understanding its features at all levels [Electronic resource] In Conversations in the society of lovers of Russian literature. ORLS. URL: http.//philologos.narod.ru/melnikov-vf.htm (accessed: July 15, 2019). (In Russ.).
  7. Abdullayeva, F.E., Li, S.I. & Proskurina, A.V. (2019). Teleut Labor and Life In Handbook of Research on Ecosystem-Based Theoretical Models of Learning and Communication, E.A. Railean (Ed.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. pp. 294—307. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7853-6.
  8. Araeva, L.A., Artemova, T.V., Bulgakova, O.A., Obraztsova, M.N. & Kreydlin, G.E. (2015). Propositional frame-based description of fragments of teleuts linguistic worldview, Review of European Studies, 7 (6), 295—301.
  9. Obraztsova, M.N., Denisova, E.S. & Kereksibesova, U.V. (2019). The Symbolism of Archaic Rites, Signs and Superstitions of Teleuts In Handbook of Research on Ecosystem-Based Theoretical Models of Learning and Communication, E.A. Railean (Ed.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 277—293. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7853-6.
  10. Olenev, S.V., Araeva, L.A. & Bulgakova, O.A. (2019). Teleuts' Family and Kinship Ties: Socio-Demographic Background and Linguistic Analysis In Handbook of Research on Ecosystem-Based Theoretical Models of Learning and Communication, E.A. Railean (Ed.). Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 308—323. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7853-6.
  11. Linguistic picture of the world of Teleuts (2018). Monograph, L.A. Araeva & A.V. Proskurina (Eds.). Kemerovo: KemSU. (In Russ.).
  12. Obraztsova, M.N., Crimea, I.A. & Kuznetsova, V.S. (2018). Creating open electronic educational resources in the Russian language for the indigenous peoples of Siberia as a result of interethnic interaction in the territory of one country, Rusin, 51(1), 312—328. doi: 10.17223/18572685/51/20. (In Russ.).
  13. Lomakina, O.V. & Mokienko, V.M. (2016). The cognitive potential of Ruthenian paremias against the background of Russian and Ukrainian languages, Rusin, 3 (45), 119—129. doi: 10.17223/18572685/45/9. (In Russ.).
  14. Khrolenko, A.T. (2016). Fundamentals of linguoculturology. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russ.).
  15. Russian oral folk art (2006), Anthology, V.P. Anikin (Ed.). Moscow: Vysshaja shkola. (In Russ.).
  16. Dal’ V.I. (2011). Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language: In 4 vols. Vol. 3. Moscow: Bustard; Russian language. Media. (In Russ.).
  17. Anikin, V.P. (1967). Russian folk proverbs, sayings, riddles and children's folklore. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. (In Russ.).
  18. Krieger, G.N. (2012). The self-consciousness of the representatives of the Teleut ethnic group: cultural and historical determinants and structurally meaningful characteristics: a monograph. Kemerovo: State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Kemerovo State University. (In Russ.).
  19. Kimeev, V.M. (2017). The historical fate of the Teleuts: a textbook. Kemerovo. (In Russ.).
  20. Funk, D.A. (1993). Bachat Teleuts in the XVIII — the first quarter of the XX century: historical and ethnographic research. Moscow: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS. (In Russ.).
  21. Zavyalova, E.E. (2013). Signs as a folklore genre: the experience of systematization, Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2, 187—193. (In Russ.).
  22. Kozina, O. (2090). Signs and superstition as a category of observation-analysis in traditional Russian culture, Analytics of Cultural Studies, 2 (14), 262—264. (In Russ.).
  23. Agapova, N.A., Bankova, T.B. & Ugryumova, M.M. (2017). Keyword of folk signs: representation of the constant of culture In Constants of Russian folk culture: language incarnations. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. (In Russ.).
  24. Pavlova, E.G. (1984). The experience of classification of folk signs In Paremiological studies, comp. G.L. Permyakov (Ed.). Moscow: Nauka. pp. 294—299. (In Russ.).
  25. Ivanova, N.N. (2001). Sign-proverb as a special paremiological unit In V.I. Far in the paradigm of modern science: Language — literature — self-awareness — culture: All-Russian scientific conference dedicated to the 200th anniversary of V.I. Dahl: at 2 pm Part 1. Ivanovo: Ivanovo University publishing house. pp. 33—35. (In Russ.).
  26. Dictionary of folk signs in different structural languages (Russian, Tatar, English, German) (2014). Kazan: Publishing House “Printing Service XXI Century”. (In Russ.).
  27. Russian folk month (1990). Yaroslavl: Upper Volzh. Prince ed. (In Russ.).
  28. Teleut zemlya (2018). Appendix to the newspaper of the Belovsky municipal district “Rural Dawns”. no 56. October 26. (In Russ.).
  29. Rybnikova, M.A. (1932). Riddles. Moscow—Leningrad: Academia. (In Russ.).
  30. Kvyatkovsky, A.P. (1966). Poetic dictionary. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
  31. Funk, D.A. (1992). Oral creativity, games and entertainment of the Bachat Teleuts In Materials for the series “Peoples and Cultures”. Issue VIII. Teleuts. Moscow: IEA RAS. pp. 5—140. (In Russ.).
  32. Verenich, T.M. (2012). Features of a national character in the phraseological picture of the world (based on French and Russian languages) In Philology and Linguistics in Modern Society: Materials of the Intern. scientific conf. (Moscow, May 2012). Moscow: Your printing partner. pp. 51—53. (In Russ.).
  33. Telia, V.N. (1996). Russian phraseology. Semantic, pragmatic and linguocultural aspects. Moscow: School “Languages of Russian Culture”. (In Russ.).
  34. Mokienko, V.M. (2005). Riddles of Russian phraseology. Moscow: Alphabet-classic, Avalon. (In Russ.).
  35. Phraseological dictionary of the Russian language (1987). L.A. Voinova, V.P. Zhukov, A.I. Molotkov, A.I. Fedorov (Eds.). Moscow: Russian language. (In Russ.).
  36. Yakuchakova, O. (2009). Idioms of the Teleut language as an explicator of national archetypes [Electronic resource], Youth Scientific Conference of Tomsk State University. Tomsk, 2010. Issue 1: Humanities issues. pp. 185—188. URL: http://programma.x-pdf.ru/16tehnicheskie/ 99784-2-materiali-xlviii-mezhdunarodnoy-nauchnoy-studencheskoy-konferencii-student-nauchno-tehnicheskiy-progress-10-14-aprelya-20.php (accessed: 20.07.2019). (In Russ.).
  37. Proskurina, A.V. (2016). To the question of the internal form of the Teleut language, Man and language in the communicative space: Sat. scientific Art. / holes and scientific ed. prof. B.Ya. Sharifullin. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University. 7 (16), 240—248. URL: http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/21605 (accessed: 07.10.2019). (In Russ.).
  38. Valentinova, O.I., Preobrazhensky, S.Yu. & Rybakov, M.A. (2016). Forgotten Linguistics Paradigms: G.P. Systemology Melnikova, Philological sciences. Scientific reports of higher education, 5, 85—91. (In Russ.).
  39. Lingvostranovedchesky Teleut-Russian dictionary of multimedia type (2019). L.A. Araeva, A.V. Proskurina, F.E. Abdullaeva, O.A. Bulgakova, E.S. Denisova et al. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2017—2019. URL: http://ls-teleut.kemsu.ru (accessed: 10.08.2019). (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2019 Denisova E.S., Proskurina A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies