The State and Prospects of the Study of Russian Phraseology in the Sixth Grade of the Kyrgyz School

Cover Page

Cite item


Paper we analyzed the state of affairs and outlines the prospects for the study of Russian phraseology in the sixth grade of the Kyrgyz school. The relevance of the research is determined by the fact that knowledge of phraseology by Kyrgyz students helps them to master the literary norms of word use, to make the most accurate choice of the optimal speech means of the language. Based on this, the purpose of this work is to study the content of Russian language programs and textbooks for the sixth grades of the Kyrgyz school, determine the availability and diversity of theoretical and practical material, as well as determine the level of proficiency in Russian phraseology by sixth grade students of the Kyrgyz school. To solve the problems of the study, the theoretical concept of “bilingualism” was analyzed, and the features of this linguistic phenomenon among representatives of the Kyrgyz culture were described. The results of the study made it possible to identify positive aspects that require improvement in the educational (theoretical and practical) material of textbooks on the topic “Phraseology”, as well as to determine the level of proficiency in Russian phraseology by sixth-graders of the Kyrgyz school. The study resulted in recommendations for building a methodological system for teaching Russian phraseology to Kyrgyz schoolchildren in order to improve their phraseological literacy.

About the authors

Anna V. Kovaleva

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0806-483X

Assistant of the Department of the Russian Language and Intercultural Communication of the Institute of the Russian Language

6, Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation


  1. Telija, V.N. 1988. Metaforizacija i ejo rol’ v sozdanii jazykovoj kartiny mira. Moscow: Nauka publ. Print. (in Russ.)
  2. Kornilov, O.A. 2003. Jazykovye kartiny mira kak proizvodnye nacional’nyh mentalitetov. Moscow: CheRo publ. Print. (in Russ.)
  3. Leont’ev, A.A. 1970. Nekotorye problemy obuchenija russkomu jazyku kak inostrannomu. Moscow: Mosk. un-t publ. Print. (in Russ.)
  4. Bulgarova, B., Bragina, M., Novoselova, N., Zolotykh, E. 2017. Classification and typology of bilingualism. RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices, 14 (3), 384—392. Web. (in Russ.) doi: 10.22363/2312-8011-2017-14-3-384-392
  5. Rozencvejg, V.Ju. 1972. Jazykovye kontakty: Lingvisticheskaja problematika. Leningrad: Nauka publ. Print. (in Russ.)
  6. Shherba, L.V. 1974. K voprosu o dvujazychii. Leningrad. Print. (in Russ.)
  7. Bakhtikireeva, U.M. 2015. Modern trends in the development of bilingual education in Russia and in the world (Instead of Epilogue to the special issue of the Bulletin). RUDN Journal of Language Education and Translingual Practices 5: 366—374. Print. (in Russ.)
  8. Dianova, L.P. Shhennikova, N.V., Poljakova, E.V. 2021. Russkij jazyk v rechevoj kul’ture studentovbilingvov: dinamicheskij analiz [Russian language in the speech culture of bilingual students: dynamic analysis]. Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshej shkoly 6-2: 199—205. Print. (in Russ.) doi: 10.20339/PhS.6-21.199
  9. Tagaev, M.Dzh. 2015. Dialog jazykov i kul’tur (na materiale funkcionirovanija i vzaimodejstvija kul’turno-jazykovyh prostranstv kirgizskogo i russkogo jazykov). Bishkek: KRSU publ. Print. (in Russ.)
  10. Russian language program for grades 5—9 of secondary schools with Kyrgyz, Uzbek, Tajik languages of instruction. 2018. Bishkek. Print. (in Russ.)
  11. Zadorozhnaja, N.P., Tairova, G.K. Russkij jazyk. 2018. Uchebnik dlja 6 kl. shkol s kyrg. jaz. Obuchenija. Bishkek: Arkus publ. Print. (in Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2022 Kovaleva A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies