Personal User’s Communicative Competence of “Mediatized World” Construction
- Authors: Chankova E.V.1, Sorokin O.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
- Institute of Socio-Political Research, FCTAS RAS
- Issue: Vol 26, No 4 (2021): MEDIATIZATION IN THE DIGITAL ERA: FROM TRANSITION TO TRANSGRESSION
- Pages: 730-737
- Section: JOURNALISM
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/view/29865
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2021-26-4-730-737
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The relevance of this article is determined by the growing ubiquitous digitalization of mediatized communications, including under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020-2021. The consequence of this process is the transformation of the structure of social space and approval of virtual interaction as a basic method of communication - instead of interpersonal. These transformations entail institutional changes, manifested in axiological and normative transitions of communicative space, semantic restructuring of communications under the influence of changing social reality. Induced by the technological infrastructure of communication, a “mediatized social reality” emerges, which also entails semantic changes in communication. All these circumstances actualize the phenomenon of communicative competence of an individual, which determines the effectiveness of interactions in the context of technological, semantic and institutional changes. The article presents some outcomes of empirical verification of communicative competence in contemporary Russian interaction practices. The phenomenon of hybridization of communicative competence during the transition of a person from the environment of real communications to the environment of virtual communications, contributes to the construction of “mediatized social reality” and expands his social reality. This ability of an individual and his communicative competence for transgression, combined with hybridity, is a factor in the integration of the communicative space of society with its contradictory characteristics.
About the authors
Elena V. Chankova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: chev3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8831-0836
Doctor of Sociology, Professor at the Department of Advertising
36 Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115093, Russian FederationOleg V. Sorokin
Institute of Socio-Political Research, FCTAS RAS
Email: ov.sorokin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2597-9465
Candidate of Sociology, Senior Researcher at the Department of Sociology of the Youth
6/1 Fotieva St, Moscow, 119333, Russian FederationReferences
- Castells, M. (2020). Power of Communication. Moscow: HSE Publishing house. (In Russ.)
- Zubok, Yu.A., & Chuprov, V.I. (2020). Youth in the cultural space: self-regulation of living. Moscow: Norm. (In Russ.)
- Zimnyaya, I.A. (1995). Key competencies - a new paradigm of the result of modern education. In Eidos online magazine. (In Russ.)
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1995). The social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Publishing house “Medium”. (In Russ.)
- Zhukov, Yu.M. (2003). Communicative training. Moscow: Gardariki (In Russ.)
- Makarevich, E.F., & Karpukhin, O.I. (2017). Global culture of communication. Мoscow. (In Russ.)
- Kolomiets, V.P. (2020). Mediatization of media. (In Russ.)
- Schutz, A. (2003). Semantic structures of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology. M.: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation. (In Russ.)
- Chankova, E.V. (2018). Communicative competence of an individual in the conditions of a changing social reality. Synopsis of the thesis. (In Russ.)
- Nim, E. (2017). (Un) social construction of reality in the era of mediatization. Sociological Review, 16(3), 409-427. (In Russ.) .
- Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.