Problems and prospects for the future career: “Public and municipal administration” students’ estimates

Cover Page

Abstract


In recent years, in Russia both official and media discourses have emphasized the need to modernize, optimize and reform the institutions of public and municipal administration as basic means of socio-economic and political development of the country. Unfortunately, quite often different organizational forms within the system of social management encounter not only institutional or objective obstacles, but also subjective problems determined by the “quality” of human resources. For decades, the concept “official” in the Russian public opinion retains its negative connotations; at the same time, the corresponding professions are extremely attractive for the younger generations as a guarantee of not high income, but rather of a stable financial and social status. The authors compare the results of two surveys conducted in 2011 and 2015 on the samples of “public and municipal administration” students in the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia to reveal if they are committed to the stereotypes of mass consciousness on the problems and prospects of the state and municipal employees as a professional group with specific formal and informal corporate rules and requirements, which tends to remain closed for a common man. The authors recognize the limits for comparing two surveys data due to the modification of the questionnaire; however, they identify a number of important trends in the future state and municipal employees’ perception of ethical requirements, public expectations and claims to their work.


V S Muhametzhanova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: mukhametzhanova_vs@pfur.ru

Ethics Chair

E A Ivlev

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: ivlevdjon@mail.ru

Sociology Chair

  • Alekseev S. Administrativnaja reforma i optimizacija ispolnitel'noj vlasti [Administrative re-form and optimization of the executive power] // Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2005. №2.
  • Bojkov V.E. Tsennosti nravstvennogo soznanija: opyt sociologicheskogo izuchenija [Values of moral consciousness: A sociological study] // Sociologija vlasti. 2004. №2.
  • Golosenko I.A. Fenomen «russkoj vzjatki»: ocherk istorii otechestvennoj sociologii chinov-nichestva [“Russian bribe” phenomenon: A short story of the Russian sociology of bureaucra-cy] // Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii. 1999. T.II. Vyp.3.
  • Grazhdan V. O nekompetentnosti i bjurokratizme v gosudarstvennoj sluzhbe [On the incompe-tence and bureaucracy at the public service] // Gosudarstvennaja sluzhba. 2002. №1.
  • Ipatova A.A. Zachem sovremennoj Rossii chinovnik? [Why does modern Russia need the word “chinovnik”?] // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2013. №1.
  • Magun V., Gimpelson V. Rossijskij chinovnik: vhod i vyhod [Russian officials: in and out] // URL: http://wsyachina.narod.ru/social_sciences/russian_clerk.html.
  • McClelland D. Motivacija cheloveka [Human Motivation]. SPb., 2007.
  • Muhametzhanova V.S. Sociologicheskie aspekty otsenki effektivnosti municipal'noj sluzhby: eticheskie komponenty professionalizma [Sociological aspects of assessing the efficiency of municipal service: Ethical components of professionalism] // Sociologija gossluzhby i kadrovoj politiki. M., 2012.
  • Müller M., Trotsuk I.V. Proekt sil'noj Rossii v elitnom obrazovanii putinskogo perioda: vzgljad s pozicij poststrukturalistskoj teorii diskursa [The ‘strong Russia’ project in the elite education of Putin’s period: Post-structuralism theory of discourse perspective] // Forum novejshej vos-tochnoevropejskoj istorii i kul'tury. 2011. T.8. №1.
  • Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. Ozhidanija i opasenija rossijskogo studenchestva v pro-fessional'noj sfere: rezul'taty empiricheskogo proekta [Expectations and fears of Russian students in the professional field: The results of an empirical study] // Poisk. 2014. №4.
  • Pisarkova L.F. Rossijskij chinovnik na sluzhbe v kontse XVIII – pervoj polovine XIX veka [Russian official in the service at the end of XVIII – first half of XIX century] // Chelovek. 1995. №3.
  • Puzаnоvа Zh.V., Semenova I.V. Motivacija vybora professii «upravlenca» (po re-zul'tatam is-sledovanija v RUDN) [Motives to choose “manager” profession (the results of the survey in PFUR)] // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2015. №3.
  • Rabochie, uchitelja, voennye, ili rejting doverija professional'nym gruppam [Workers, teachers, and military, or the rating of trust in professional groups]. Press-vypusk VCIOM №3013 // URL: http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115542.
  • Rybakov A. Ispolnitel'naja vlast' kak faktor razvitija rossijskogo obshhestva [Executive power as a factor of the Russian society development] // Vlast. 2002. №12.
  • Surikova T.I. Kakov sovremennyj chinovnik v russkoj jazykovoj kartine mira i za chto? Lingvojeticheskie aspekty formirovanija koncepta [What is the image of the official in the Russian linguistic picture of the world, and why? Linguistic and ethical aspects of the con-cept] // URL: http://russkii-yazik.ucoz.ru/blog/kakov_sovremennyj_chinovnik_v_ russ-koj_jazykovoj_kartine_mira_i_za_chto_lingvoehticheskie_aspekty_formirovanija_koncepta/2010-12-24-2.
  • Trotsuk I.V., Sokhadze K.G. Tsennostnye orientacii molodezhi: podhody, metodiki i zadachi sociologicheskogo analiza [Value orientations of the youth: Approaches, techniques, and tasks of the sociological analysis] // Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija. 2015. №20.
  • Holod A.V., Subbotina Ju.A. Analiz upravlencheskoj kul'tury v organizacijah go-sudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravlenija regiona [Analysis of the management culture in the regional public and municipal organizations] // Kul'tura, upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. 2005. №4.
  • Shapovalov V.F. Istoki i smysl rossijskoj civilizacii [Origins and Meaning of Russian Civiliza-tion]. M., 2003.
  • Shmerlina I.A. «Kodeks chesti» rossijskogo chinovnika: nabroski k programme jem-piricheskogo issledovanija [Russian official’s “code of honor”: A draft for the empirical re-search program] // Vestnik RUDN. Serija «Sociologija». 2012. №4.
  • Beetham D. Bureaucracy. Milton Keynes, 1987.

Views

Abstract - 1186

PDF (Russian) - 51


Copyright (c) 2016 V S Muhametzhanova, E A Ivlev

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.