Vignette method in sociological research: Methodological principles and techniques

Cover Page

Abstract


The article considers prospects for the new sociological method - vignette method - based mainly on foreign studies that developed, applied and summarized the results of the method application. The authors trace the history of the method in the Western and Russian traditions focusing on the topics of research in different fields, including sensitive issues. The theoretical part of the article is illustrated by the examples of vignettes introduced by different authors, in which the specifics of vignettes design and usage in sociological studies is shown. From the perspective of the analysis of meanings, beliefs, and explanatory schemes the authors demonstrate similarities of the method of vignettes and ethnographic interviews; underline advantages and disadvantages of the method as well as its restrictions; provide the key principles for vignettes design in different types of studies. The article considers two strategies of analysis of vignettes data - qualitative and quantitative - and emphasizes the importance of combinatorial-logic techniques, in particular DSM-method, within quantitative strategy and the principle of ‘deepening’ - within qualitative strategy. The authors provide examples of vignettes developed in their own research to show the capabilities of the method.


Zh V Puzanova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: pouzanova@rambler.ru

Sociology Chair

A G Tertyshnikova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: nastysha-88@inbox.ru

Sociology Chair

  • Anshakov O.M., Fabrikantova E.F. DSM-metod avtomaticheskogo porozhdeniya gipotez: Logicheskie i epistemologicheskie osnovaniya. M., 2009.
  • Danilova E.N., Klimova S.G., Mikheenkova M.A. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya logiko-kombinatornykh metodov dlya analiza sotsial'noi informatsii // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 1999. № 11.
  • Devyatko I.F. Prichinnost' v obydennom soznanii i sotsiologicheskom ob"yasnenii: kontury novogo sotsiologicheskogo podkhoda // Sotsiologiya 4M. 2007. № 25
  • Ermizina E.V., Puzanova Zh.V. Problemy verbal'noi kommunikatsii v sotsiologicheskom issledovanii. M., 2009.
  • Kusakina V.O. Metod vin'etok v izuchenii reproduktivnykh ustanovok // URL: http://www.ssa-rss.ru/files/File/congress2012/part50.pdf.
  • Pankratova E.S., Finn V.K. Avtomaticheskoe porozhdenie gipotez v intellektual'nykh sistemakh. M., 2009.
  • Tatarova G.G. Osnovy tipologicheskogo analiza v sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh: Uchebnoe posobie. M., 2007.
  • Tertyshnikova A.G. Metodologicheskie i metodicheskie aspekty izucheniya sotsial'nykh predstavlenii ob intelligentsii // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya «Sotsiologiya». 2012. № 4.
  • Barter C., Reynold E. The use of vignettes in qualitative research // URL: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU2.5html.
  • Braun V., Clarke V. An Introduction to the Vignette Method // URL: http://studysites.uk.sagepub.com/braunandclarke/study/Learning%20Resources/An%20 Introduction%20to%20the%20Vignette%20Method.docx.
  • Brondani M.A., MacEntee M.I., Bryant S.R., O’Neil B. Using written vignettes in focus groups among older adults to discuss oral health as a sensitive topic // Qualitative Health Research. 2008. № 18.
  • Cochran J.K., Heide K.M. Capital punishment preferences for special offender populations // Journal of Criminal Justice. 2003. № 31.
  • Gerber E. Calculating Residence: A Cognitive Approach to Household Membership Judgements among Low Income Blacks. Unpublished Census Bureau report, 1990.
  • Gerber E. The Language of Residence: Respondent Understandings and Census Rules. Final Report of the Cognitive Study of Living Situations. Center for Survey Methods Research, U.S. Census Bureau, 1994.
  • Hughes R. Considering vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behavior // Sociology of Health and Illness. 1998. № 20.
  • Krosnick J.A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1991. № 5.
  • Martin E. Vignettes and respondent debriefing for questionnaire design and evaluation // URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.80.711&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Mckeganey N., Abel M., Hay G. Contrasting methods of collecting data on injectors' risk behavior // AIDS Care. 1996. № 8.
  • Neff J.A. Interactional versus hypothetical others: The use of vignettes in attitude research // Sociology and Social Research. 1979. № 64.
  • Parkinson B., Manstead A.S. R. Making sense of emotion in stories and social life // Cognition and Emotion. 1993. № 7.
  • Piaget J. The Moral Judgment of the Child. N.Y., 1965.
  • Rahman N. Caregivers’ sensitivity to conflict: The use of vignette methodology // Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect. 1996. № 8.
  • Rossi P.H., Nock S.L. (Eds.) Measuring Social Judgments: The Factorial Survey Approach. Beverley Hills, 1982.
  • Schutz A. The Phenomenology of The Social World. Evanston, 1967.
  • Stolte J.F. The context of satisfying in vignette research // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1994. № 134.
  • Thurman Q.S., Lam J., Rossi P. Sorting out the cockoo’s nest: a factorial survey approach to the study of popular conceptions of mental illness // The Sociological Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 29. № 4.

Views

Abstract - 367

PDF (Russian) - 239


Copyright (c) 2015 Zh V Puzanova, A G Tertyshnikova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.