Perception of fake news by students with different psychological characteristics: Results of the methodological experiment

Abstract

The perception of fake news has become the focus of social-humanitarian research as affecting people’s behavior. Students have always been a reactive force of society, so the question of what characteristics determine students’ perception of fake news is quite relevant. The authors consider as such characteristics the level of emotional intelligence (EI), suggestibility and psychotype. To check how these characteristics determine the perception of fake news, the Laboratory of Sociological and Focus Group Research of the RUDN University conducted a methodological experiment with the focus group method in 2022. Two groups were randomized according to the psychotype: the first group consisted of participants with a high level of EI, the second group - with a low level of EI. The groups included only those students who considered themselves capable of distinguishing fake news from real situations. Both groups watched videos that presented fake news as real. The moderator was to make participants doubt, to convince them of the reality of the news. After the group discussion, the design of the experiment was revealed to its participants. The discussion and tests before and after the discussion allowed to conclude that EI and psychotype weakly affect the capability to identify fake news under external influences, but a high level of EI determines both critical perception and ability to change one’s position, i.e. suggestibility. The participants’ logical argumentation depends on the psychotype and level of EI, but the quality of the argument seems to depend on the general erudition and education. The authors’ findings are consistent with the results of related studies, but the suggestion component of the experiment is close to everyday situations and provides opportunities for developing media literacy programs for students.

About the authors

Zh. V. Puzanova

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: puzanova-zhv@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

T. I. Larina

RUDN University

Email: larina-ti@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

A. A. Starostina

RUDN University

Email: starostina-aa@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

References

  1. Zuykina K.L., Sokolova D.V. Osobennosti identifikatsii feykovyh novostey molodezhnoy auditoriey [Features of identification of fake news by the youth audience]. Vestnik TGU. Filologiya. 2021; 71. (In Russ.).
  2. IA TASS: Kolichestvo feykov v seti v 2022 godu vyroslo v shest raz [In 2022, the number of fakes on the Internet increased sixfold]. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/16642301. (In Russ.).
  3. Larina T.I. Sochetanie fokus-gruppovogo i eksperimentalnogo metodov v prikladnyh sotsiologicheskih tselyah [A combination of focus group and experiment for applied sociological tasks]. Dnevnik Nauk. 2022; 9. (In Russ.).
  4. Medialogiya: Fake news za 2017 i 2018 gody [Medialogy: Fake news for 2017 and 2018]. 2019. URL: https://www.mlg.ru/ratings/research/6438. (In Russ.).
  5. MIA “Rossiya Segodnya”: Kazhdy vtoroy rossiyanin verit feykovym novostyam, zayavil glava WCIOM [MIA “Russia Today”: Every second Russian believes fake news, said the head of WCIOM]. 2019. URL: https://ria.ru/20190626/1555944841.html. (In Russ.).
  6. Ovchinnikov B.V., Tyuryapina I.V. Problema diagnostiki aktsentuatsiy lichnosti: oprosnik aktsentuirovannyh radikalov [Diagnostics of personality accentuations: Questionnaire of accentuated radicals]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2016; 9 (1). (In Russ.).
  7. Ponomarenko V.V. Prakticheskaya kharakterologiya. Metodika 7 radikalov [Practical Characterology. 7 Radicals Technique]. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.).
  8. Puzanova Zh.V., Larina T.I., Gudkova Ya.A. Diagnostika urovnya konformnosti studencheskoy molodezhi (rezultaty metodicheskogo eksperimenta) [Diagnostics of the students’ level of conformity (Results of the methodological experiment)]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2022; 22 (3). (In Russ.).
  9. Sukhodolov A.P., Bychkova A.M. “Feykovye Novosti” kak fenomen sovremennogo mediaprostranstva: ponyatiya, vidy, naznachenie, mery protivodeystviya [“Fake news” as a phenomenon of the today’s media space: Concepts, types, purpose, countermeasures]. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki Zhurnalistiki. 2017; 6 (2). (In Russ.).
  10. Test emotsionalnogo intellekta Schutte [Schutte Emotional Intelligence Test]. URL: https:// psytests.org/emotional/schutte.html. (In Russ.).
  11. Trotsuk I. Diskursivnoe konstruirovanie sotsialnoy realnosti: kontseptualnye osnovaniya i empiricheskie priemy razoblacheniya “skvernyh” praktik [Discursive construction of social reality: Conceptual foundations and empirical devices for unmasking the “abominable” practices. Russian Sociological Review. 2014; 13 (2). (In Russ.).
  12. Trotsuk I.V., Il`yina V.V. Poisk skrytyh smyslov kak instrument otsenki effektivnosti sotsialnoy reklamy: aprobatsiya metodicheskogo podkhoda [Hidden meanings in evaluation of the social advertising efficiency: A methodological approach]. Communicology. 2020; 8 (4). (In Russ.).
  13. Mayer J.D., Di Paolo M., Salovey P. Perceiving affective content in ambiguous visual stimuli: A component of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1990; 54 (3, 4).
  14. Preston S., Anderson A., Robertson D.J., Shephard M.P., Huhe N. Detecting fake news on Facebook: The role of emotional intelligence. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (3).

Copyright (c) 2023 Puzanova Z.V., Larina T.I., Starostina A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies